Internal and Emergency Medicine

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 59–63 | Cite as

Endotrol-tracheal tube assisted endotracheal intubation during video laryngoscopy

  • Davide CattanoEmail author
  • Carlos Artime
  • Vineela Maddukuri
  • William H. Daily
  • Alfonso Altamirano
  • Katherine C. Normand
  • Clarence E. GilmoreIV
  • Carin A. Hagberg


Video laryngoscopes allow indirect visualization of the glottis and provide superior views of the glottis compared to direct laryngoscopes in patients with both normal and difficult airways, but it may be difficult to advance the endotracheal tube (ETT) through the vocal cords into the trachea, unless a stylet is used. We propose that the Endotrol® ETT may be an effective tool to facilitate video laryngoscope-assisted orotracheal intubation without the use of a stylet. After obtaining written and oral informed consent, 60-adult patients scheduled for elective surgery requiring general anesthesia with orotracheal intubation were enrolled. Patients were randomized, respectively, to 1 of 4 groups: Group A1, (15 patients): McGrath® with Endotrol® ETT; Group A2, (15 patients): McGrath® with GlideRite®-styletted standard ETT; Group B1, (15 patients): GlideScope® with Endotrol® ETT; Group B2, (15 patients): GlideScope® with GlideRite®-styletted standard ETT. Statistical analysis was performed with Stata (Stata Corp v10, College Station). Mean time to intubation was longer in the Endotrol® groups compared to the GlideRite® groups: 60.1 (31.6) vs. 44.4 (27.6) s (p < 0.05). It was subjectively more difficult to intubate using the Endotrol® than with a GlideRite®-styletted ETT (difficulty score median [range] 2 [1–5] vs. 1 [1–3], respectively). Three intubations using the Endotrol® were characterized as difficult, whereas there were no difficult intubations with the GlideRite®stylet. The Endotrol® ETT, as compared to a standard ETT with a non-malleable stylet, is associated with longer intubation times and a subjective increase in difficulty of use. It may, however, still be a clinically viable alternative in video laryngoscope-assisted orotracheal intubation when use of a rigid stylet is undesirable.


Difficult airway Airway management Video laryngoscopy Endotracheal intubation 



This study is funded by Covidien, LMA North America (McGrath).

Conflicts of interest

Davide Cattano received research funding from Coviden, consulted for Smith-medical, USA, and received research funding from Karl Storz, Germany. For the present study, he received research support (material) from LMA, NA (McGrath) and Verathon (Glidescope). Carlos Artime reported no conflicts of interest. Vineela Maddukuri reported no conflicts of interest. William H. Daily reported no conflicts of interest. Alfonso Altamirano reported no conflicts of interest. Normand reported no conflicts of interest. Clarence E. Gilmore, IV reported no conflicts of interest. Carin A. Hagberg consulted for Coviden, consulted for AMBU, received research funding from AMBU, reported a conflict of interest with AMBU, and reported a conflict of interest with LMA North America for other on AMBU and LMA North America. Dr. Hagberg is on the speaker’s bureau.


  1. 1.
    Rai MR, Dering A, Verghese C (2005) The glidescope system: a clinical assessment of performance. Anaesthesia 60:60–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shippey B, Ray D, McKeown D (2007) Case series: the McGrath videolaryngoscope–an initial clinical evaluation. Can J Anaesth 54:307–313PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kaplan MB, Hagberg CA, Ward DS, Brambrink A, Chhibber AK, Heidegger T, Lozada L, Ovassapian A, Parsons D, Ramsay J, Wilhelm W, Zwissler B, Gerig HJ, Hofstetter C, Karan S, Kreisler N, Pousman RM, Thierbach A, Wrobel M, Berci G (2006) Comparison of direct and video-assisted views of the larynx during routine intubation. J Clin Anesth 18:357–362PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Niforopoulou P, Pantazopoulos I, Demestiha T, Koudouna E, Xanthos T (2010) Video-laryngoscopes in the adult airway management: a topical review of the literature. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 54:1050–1061PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    van Zundert A, Maassen R, Lee R, Willems R, Timmerman M, Siemonsma M, Buise M, Wiepking M (2009) A Macintosh laryngoscope blade for videolaryngoscopy reduces stylet use in patients with normal airways. Anesth Analg 109:825–831PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cuchillo JV, Rodriguez MA (2005) Considerations aimed at facilitating the use of the new GlideScope videolaryngoscope. Can J Anaesth 52:661PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Malik AM, Frogel JK (2007) Anterior tonsillar pillar perforation during GlideScope® video laryngoscopy. Anesth Analg 104:1610–1611PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vincent RD Jr, Wimberly MP, Brockwell RC, Magnuson JS (2007) Soft palate perforation during orotracheal intubation facilitated by the GlideScope video laryngoscope. J Clin Anesth 19(8):619–621PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cross P, Cytryn J, Cheng KK (2007) Perforation of the soft palate using the GlideScope videolaryngoscope. Can J Anesth 54:588–589PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hirabayashi Y (2007) Pharyngeal injury related to GlideScope video laryngoscope. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 137:175–176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cooper RM (2007) Complications associated with the use of the GlideScope videolaryngoscope. Can J Anesth 54:54–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hsu WT, Hsu SC, Lee YL, Huang JS, Chen CL (2007) Penetrating injury of the soft palate during GlideScope intubation. Anesth Analg 104:1609–1610PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yamakage M, Takahashi M, Tachibana N, Takahashi K, Namiki A (2009) Usefulness of Endoflex endotracheal tube for oral and nasal tracheal intubations. Eur J Anaesthesiol 26:661–665PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Teoh WL, Sia ATH, Fun WLL (2009) A prospective, randomised, cross-over trial comparing the EndoFlex and standard tracheal tubes in patients with predicted easy intubation. Anaesthesia 64:1172–1177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Phua D, Wang CF, Yoong CS (2008) Use of the Endoflex endotracheal tube as a stylet-free alternative in GlideScope intubations. Can J Anesth 55:473–474PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shigematsu T, Miyazawa N, Kobayashi M, Yorozu T, Toyoda Y, Morisaki H (1994) Nasal intubation with Bullard laryngoscope: a useful approach for difficult airways. Anesth Analg 79:132–135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sugiyama K, Takahashi N, Kohjitani A (2009) Combining the EndoFlex tube with fiberoptic bronchoscopy in difficult intubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 53:960–963PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SIMI 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Davide Cattano
    • 1
    Email author
  • Carlos Artime
    • 1
  • Vineela Maddukuri
    • 1
  • William H. Daily
    • 1
  • Alfonso Altamirano
    • 1
  • Katherine C. Normand
    • 1
  • Clarence E. GilmoreIV
    • 1
  • Carin A. Hagberg
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of Texas Medical School at HoustonHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations