Internal and Emergency Medicine

, Volume 4, Issue 6, pp 501–506 | Cite as

Emergency department use by the uninsured after health care reform in Massachusetts

  • Peter Smulowitz
  • Bruce E. Landon
  • Laura Burke
  • Christopher Baugh
  • Heather Gunn
  • Robert Lipton
EM - Original


The objective of this article is to determine if health care reform in Massachusetts in 2006 was associated with a change in ED utilization by the uninsured for asthma and upper respiratory tract infection (URI). We performed a retrospective pre–post study in an urban tertiary-care teaching hospital. Subjects included all patients, ages 2–54, who presented to the ED with asthma or URI from January 1 to July 31 for each of the 3 years before health care reform and for the period after the insurance mandate officially went into effect on January 1, 2008. We used chi-square analysis to compare the frequency of utilization of the ED by uninsured patients before and after the implementation of an individual health insurance mandate in Massachusetts. For the period before the implementation of health reform, an annual average of 301 ED visits for patients with either URI (average n = 131) or asthma (average n = 170) were identified. After health care reform, there were 366 visits found for URI (n = 132) and asthma (n = 234) over a similar time period. There was a statistically significant decrease in ED utilization by the uninsured for URI but not for asthma. As a secondary analysis, visits for patients covered by the uncompensated care pool (UCP) before health care reform was not different from the combined frequency of visits by the remaining uninsured covered by a health safety net pool and those who qualified for the state subsidized Commonwealth Care program after health care reform. In this study, health care reform was associated with a decrease in the number of uninsured patients who presented to the ED with URI but not asthma. This study is limited by its analysis of a single large institution and a limited set of diagnoses.


Uninsured Emergency department utilization Health insurance 


Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest related to the publication of this manuscript.


  1. 1.
    McDonough JE, Rosman B, Phelps F et al (2006) The third wave of Massachusetts health care access reform. Health Aff 25:w420–w431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    The New Big Dig (2008) The Wall Street Journal Online. May 21, 2008. Available at: Accessed 18 June 2008
  3. 3.
    Kingsdale J (2008) Executive director’s message. June 17, 2008. Available at: Accessed 18 June 2008
  4. 4.
    Lazar K (2008) 439,000 More get health coverage: state shows big gains in landmark program. The Boston Globe. August 20, 2008. Available at: Accessed 8 Sept 2008
  5. 5.
    Health Connector Facts and Figures (2009) Available at: Accessed 23 Mar 2009
  6. 6.
    Sack K (2008) In Massachusetts, universal coverage strains care. The New York Times. April 5, 2008Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Long K (2008) On the road to universal coverage: impacts of reform in Massachusetts at one year. Health Aff 27:w270–w284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Billings J, Zeitel L, Lukomnik J et al (1993) Impact of socioeconomic status on hospital use in New York City. Health Aff 12:162–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vanderweil SG, Pelletier AJ, Hamedani AG et al (2007) Declining antibiotic prescriptions for upper respiratory infections, 1993–2004. Acad Emerg Med 14:366–369PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hampton T (2004) The ED and the uninsured. JAMA 292:1419Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Newton MF, Keirns CC, Cunningham R et al (2008) Uninsured adults presenting to US emergency departments: assumptions vs data. JAMA 300:1914–1924CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Newhouse JP, Manning WG, Morris CN et al (1981) Some interim results from a controlled trial of cost sharing in health insurance. N Engl J Med 305:1501–1507PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    O’Grady KF, Manning WG, Newhouse JP et al (1985) The impact of cost-sharing on emergency department use. N Engl J Med 313:484–490PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wharam JF, Landon BE, Galbraith AA et al (2007) Emergency department use and subsequent hospitalizations among members of a high-deductible health plan. JAMA 297:1093–1102CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pane GA et al (1991) Health care access problems of medically indigent emergency department walk-in patients. Ann Emerg Med 20:730–733CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    O’Brien GM et al (1997) Use of the ED as a regular source of care: associated factors beyond lack of health insurance. Ann Emerg Med 30:286–291CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Li G, Lau JT, McCarthy MI et al (2007) Emergency department utilization in the United States and Ontario, Canada. Acad Emerg Med 14:582–584CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fuda KK, Immekus R (2006) Frequent users of Massachusetts emergency departments: a statewide analysis. Ann Emerg Med 48:9–16CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hunt KA, Weber EJ, Showstack JA, Colby DC, Callaham ML (2006) Characteristics of frequent users of emergency departments. Ann Emerg Med 48:1–8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Weber EJ, Showstack JA, Hunt KA, Colby DC, Grimes B, Bacchetti P, Callaham ML (2008) Are the uninsured responsible for the increase in emergency department visits in the United States? Ann Emerg Med 52:108–115CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SIMI 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Smulowitz
    • 1
  • Bruce E. Landon
    • 2
  • Laura Burke
    • 1
  • Christopher Baugh
    • 3
  • Heather Gunn
    • 4
  • Robert Lipton
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Emergency Medicine, WCC2Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterBostonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Medicine and Health Care PolicyHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Emergency MedicineBrigham and Women’s Hospital and Massachusetts General HospitalBostonUSA
  4. 4.Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations