Advertisement

Acta Physiologiae Plantarum

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 291–297 | Cite as

Changes of electric potential in pistils of Petunia hybrida Hort. and Brassica napus L. during pollination

  • Maria Wędzony
  • Maria Filek
Article

Abstract

The pattern of electric signals accompanying compatible and incompatible pollination were studied in pistils of petunia (Petunia hybrida L.) and rape (Brassica napus L). Electric potential was recorded for 4–7 hours with non-polarizable Ag/AgCl electrodes implanted into the ovary and beneath the sigma. At the end of measurements, pistils were fixed and the growth of pollen tubes was analyzed under a fluorescent microscope.

Action potentials appeared in both species. In rape the potential dropped by 10 mV for few minutes after pollination regardless of the compatibility of the cross. In this species, during compatible pollination action potentials with amplitudes of 15–20 mV were recorded up to one hour after pollination. They were followed by a long lasting decrease of the potential by 10 to 50 mV. Contrary, after the self-incompatible pollination, action potentials were rare and of lower amplitudes and the potential gradually raised in comparison to the initial level. During the first hour after the compatible pollination of Petunia hybrida series of action potentials with amplitudes reaching 10–20 mV were recorded. At the time corresponding to the pollen tubes entrance to the transmitting tissue of the style, action potentials reaching up to 40 mV were followed by a steady decrease of the potential. The electric signals traveled along the style with velocity of 25 mm/s. Incompatible pollination in petunia resulted only in minor oscillation and gradual increase of the potential up to 100 mV in comparison to the initial level.

The present investigation demonstrated that each phase of pollen-stigma recognition events, germination and growth of pollen tubes within the style have its characteristic pattern of electric changes which was species specific and depended on compatibility of the cross.

Key words

action potential rape incompatibility petunia pollen tube signalling in plants 

List of abbreviations

EP

electric potential

hAP

hours after pollination

AcP

action potential

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arditti J. 1979. Aspects of the physiology of orchids. Adv. Bot. Res. 7: 421–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bednarska E. 1992. Calcium uptake from the stigma by germinating pollen in Primula officinalis L. and Ruscus aculeatus L. Sex. Plant Rep. 4: 36–38.Google Scholar
  3. Bednarska E. 1995. Localization of membrane-associated calcium in unpollinated and pollinated pistil of Petunia hybrida Hort. Acta Soc. Bot. Poloniae 64(1): 19–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bednarska E., Butowt R. 1995. Calcium in pollen — pistil interaction in Petunia hybrida Hort. III. Localization of Ca2+ ions and ATPase in pollinated pistil. Folia Hist. Cytob. 33(2): 125–132.Google Scholar
  5. Clarke A. E., Anderson M. A., Atkinson A., Bacic A., Ebert P. R., Jahnen W., Lush W. M., Mau S.-L., Woodward J. R. 1989. Recent developments in the molecular genetics and biology of self-incompatibility. Plant Mol. Biol. 13: 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davies E., Zawadzki T., Witters D. 1991. Electrical activity and signal transmission in plants: How do plants know? In: Plant Signaling, plasma membrane and change of state. ed. by Penel C., Greppen H. Universite de Geneve, Geneva pp.119–137.Google Scholar
  7. Deurenberg J. J. M. 1976 a. In vitro protein synthesis with polysomes from unpollinated, cross- and selfpollinated Petunia ovaries. Planta 128(1): 29–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Deurenberg J. J. M. 1976 b. Activation of protein synthesis in ovaries from Petunia hybrida after compatible and incompatible pollination. Acta Bot. Neerl. 25(3): 221–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dickinson H. 1995. Dry stigmas, water and self incompatibility in Brassica. Sex. Plant Reprod. 8: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Donk, Van der, J. A. W. M. 1974. Synthesis of RNA and protein as a function of time and type of pollen tubestyle interaction in Petunia hybrida L.. Molec. Genet. 134: 93–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fromm J., Hajirezaei M., Wilke I. 1995. The biochemical response of electric signaling in the reproductive system of Hibiscus plants. Plant Physiol. 109: 375–384.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Gaude T., Dumas C. 1987. Molecular and cellular events of self-incompatibility. Int. Rev. Cytol. 107: 333–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lenartowska M., Bednarska E., Butowt R. 1997. Ca2+ in the pistil of Petunia hybrida Hort. during growth of the pollen tube — cytochemical and radiographic studies. Acta Biol. Crac. ser. Bot. 39: 79–89.Google Scholar
  14. Linskens H. F. 1973. Activation of the ovary. Caryologia. Suppl. 25: 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Linskens H. F., Spanjers A. W. 1973. Changes of the electric potential in the transmitting tissue of Petunia styles after cross- and self-pollination. Incompatibility Newsletter. 3: 81–85.Google Scholar
  16. Lysikov V., Dukhovnyi A. I. 1966. Izmenenie biopotentsialov v generativnykh organakh kukuruzy. Tr. Kishinievsk. Sel’skokhoz. Inst. 45: 72–75.Google Scholar
  17. Pickard B. G. 1973. Action potentials in higher plants. Bot. Rev. 39: 172–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Roberts K. 1992. Potential awareness of plants. Nature 360: 14–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Roggen H. P. J. R. 1967. Changes in enzyme activities during the progametic phase in Petunia hybrida. Acta Bot. Neerl. 16: 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sinyukhin A. M., Britikov A. A. 1967. Action potentials in the reproductive systems of plants. Nature 215: 1287–1280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Spanjers A. W. 1981. Bioelectric potential changes in the style of Lilium longiflorum Thumb. after self- and cross-pollination of the stigma. Planta. (153): 1–5.Google Scholar
  22. Wędzony M., Filek M. 1996. Changes of electric potential in wheat pistils induced by pollination. Acta Soc. Bot. Poloniae 65(1–2): 97–100.Google Scholar
  23. Wędzony M., Van Lammeren A. A. M. 1996. Pollen tube growth and early embryogenesis in wheat × maize crosses influenced by 2,4-D. Ann. Bot. 77: 639–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Department of Plant Physiology 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Wędzony
    • 1
  • Maria Filek
    • 1
  1. 1.The Franciszek Górski Department of Plant PhysiologyPolish Academy of SciencesKrakówPoland

Personalised recommendations