Breeding for salt tolerance in crop plants — the role of molecular biology
- 1.1k Downloads
Salinity in soil affects about 7 % of the land’s surface and about 5 % of cultivated land. Most importantly, about 20 % of irrigated land has suffered from secondary salinisation and 50 % of irrigation schemes are affected by salts. In many hotter, drier countries of the world salinity is a concern in their agriculture and could become a key issue. Consequently, the development of salt resistant crops is seen as an important area of research. Although there has been considerable research into the effects of salts on crop plants, there has not, unfortunately, been a commensurate release of salt tolerant cultivars of crop plants. The reason is likely to be the complex nature of the effect of salts on plants. Given the rapid increase in molecular biological techniques, a key question is whether such techniques can aid the development of salt resistance in plants.
Physiological and biochemical research has shown that salt tolerance depends on a range of adaptations embracing many aspects of a plant’s physiology: one of these the compartmentation of ions. Introducing genes for compatible solutes, a key part of ion compartmentation, in salt-sensitive species is, conceptually, a simple way of enhancing tolerance. However, analysis of the few data available suggests the consequences of transformation are not straightforward. This is not unexpected for a multigenic trait where the hierarchy of various aspects of tolerance may differ between and within species. The experimental evaluation of the response of transgenic plants to stress does not always match, in quality, the molecular biology.
We have advocated the use of physiological traits in breeding programmes as a process that can be undertaken at the present while more knowledge of the genetic basis of salt tolerance is obtained. The use of molecular biological techniques might aid plant breeders through the development of marker aided selection.
Key wordshalophytes molecular biology molecular genetics plant breeding rice salinity saltaffected soils salt tolerance sodicity
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Agboma P. C., Jones M. G. K., Peltonen Sainio P., Rita H. and Pehu E. 1997. Exogenous glycinebetaine enhances grain yield of maize, sorghum and wheat grown under two supplementary watering regimes. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science-Zeitschrift Fur Acker Und Pflanzenbau 178: 29–37.Google Scholar
- Ahmad S. 1990. Soil salinity and water management — keynote address. In: Proceedings of the Indo-Pak Workshop on Soil Salinity and Water Management. Director General, International Waterlogging and Salinity Research Institute (IWASRI): 3–18.Google Scholar
- Arakawa K., Mizuno K., Kishitani S. and Takabe T. 1992. Immunological studies of betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase in barley. Plant and Cell Physiology 33: 833–40.Google Scholar
- Bohnert H. J. and Jensen R. G. 1996. Metabolic engineering for increased salt tolerance — The next step — Comment. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 23: 661–6.Google Scholar
- Flowers T. J. and Yeo A. R. 1995. Breeding for salinity resistance in crop plants: where next? Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 22: 875–884.Google Scholar
- Garcia A., Rizzo C.A., Ud-Din J., Bartos S.L., Senadhira D., Flowers T.J. and Yeo A.R. 1997. Sodium and potassium transport to the xylem are inherited independently in rice and the mechanism of sodium: potassium selectivity differs between rice and wheat. Plant, Cell and Environment 20: 1167–1174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ghassemi F., Jakeman A. J. and Nix H. A., 1995. Salinisation of Land and Water Resources. CAB International, Wallingford, 526 pp.Google Scholar
- Gorham J., Forster B. P., Budrewicz E., Wyn Jones, R. G., Miller T. E. and Law C.N. 1986. Salt tolerance in the Triticeae: Solute accumulation and distribution in an Amphidiploid derived from Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring and Thinopyrum bessarabicum. Journal of Experimental Botany 37: 1435–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hanson A. D., Rathinasabapathi B., Rivoal J., Burnet M., Dillon M. O. and Gage D. A. 1994. Osmoprotective compounds in the Plumbaginaceae — a natural experiment in metabolic engineering of stress tolerance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 91: 306–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Harinasut P., Tsutsui K., Takabe T., Nomura M., Takabe T. and Kishitani S. 1996. Exogenous glycine-betaine accumulation and increased salt — tolerance in rice seedlings. Bioscience Biotechnology and Biochemistry 60: 366–8.Google Scholar
- Holmstrom K. O., Welin B., Mandal A., Kristiansdottir I., Teeri T. H., Lamark T., Strom A. R. and Palva E. T. 1994. Production of the Escherichia coli betaine-aldehyde dehydrogenase, an enzyme required for the synthesis of the osmoprotectant glycine betaine, in transgenic plants. Plant Journal 6: 749–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lilius G., Holmberg N. and Bulow L. 1996. Enhanced NaCl stress tolerance in transgenic tobacco expressing bacterial choline dehydrogenase. Bio-Technology 14: 177–80.Google Scholar
- Marcum K. B. and Murdoch C. L. 1994. Salinity Tolerance Mechanisms of 6 C(4) Turfgrasses. Journal of the Society for Horticultural Science 119: 779–84.Google Scholar
- Monyo E. S., Ejeta G. and Rhodes D. 1992. Genotypic Variation for Glycinebetaine in Sorghum and Its Relationship to Agronomic and Morphological Traits. Maydica 37: 283–6.Google Scholar
- Murthy M. and Tester M. 1996. Compatible solutes and salt tolerance: Misuse of trangenic tobacco. Trends in Plant Science 1: 294–5.Google Scholar
- Nolte K. D., Hanson A. D. and Gage D. A. 1997. Proline accumulation and methylation to proline betaine in Citrus: Implications for genetic engineering of stress resistance. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 122: 8–13.Google Scholar
- Rathinasabapathi B., McCue K. F., Gage D. A. and Hanson A. D. 1994. Metabolic engineering of glycine betaine synthesis — plant betaine aldehyde dehydrogenases lacking typical transit peptides are targeted to tobacco chloroplasts where they confer betaine aldehyde resistance. Planta 193: 155–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Serrano R. 1996. Salt tolerance in plants and microorganisms: Toxicity targets and defense responses. In: International Review of Cytology. A Survey of Cell Biology, Vol 165, ed. by K W Jeon Academic Press Inc: 1–52.Google Scholar
- Szabolcs I. 1992. Salinization of soils and water and its relation to desertification. Desertification Control Bulletin 21: 32–37.Google Scholar
- Valenzuelasoto E. M. and Munozclares R. A. 1994. Purification and properties of betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase extracted from detached leaves of Amaranths-hypochondriacs L subjected to water-deficit. Journal of Plant Physiology 143: 145–52.Google Scholar
- Yang W. J., Nadolskaorczyk A., Wood K. V., Hahn D. T., Rich P. J., Wood A. J., Saneoka H., Premachandra G. S., Bonham C. C., Rhodes J. C., Joly R. J., Samaras Y., Goldsbrough P. B. and Rhodes D. 1995. Near-Isogenic Lines of Maize Differing For Glycinebetaine. Plant Physiology 107: 621–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar