Acta Physiologiae Plantarum

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 427–433 | Cite as

Breeding for salt tolerance in crop plants — the role of molecular biology

  • Timothy John Flowers
  • Aurora Garcia
  • Mikiko Koyama
  • Anthony Richard Yeo
Salt Stress


Salinity in soil affects about 7 % of the land’s surface and about 5 % of cultivated land. Most importantly, about 20 % of irrigated land has suffered from secondary salinisation and 50 % of irrigation schemes are affected by salts. In many hotter, drier countries of the world salinity is a concern in their agriculture and could become a key issue. Consequently, the development of salt resistant crops is seen as an important area of research. Although there has been considerable research into the effects of salts on crop plants, there has not, unfortunately, been a commensurate release of salt tolerant cultivars of crop plants. The reason is likely to be the complex nature of the effect of salts on plants. Given the rapid increase in molecular biological techniques, a key question is whether such techniques can aid the development of salt resistance in plants.

Physiological and biochemical research has shown that salt tolerance depends on a range of adaptations embracing many aspects of a plant’s physiology: one of these the compartmentation of ions. Introducing genes for compatible solutes, a key part of ion compartmentation, in salt-sensitive species is, conceptually, a simple way of enhancing tolerance. However, analysis of the few data available suggests the consequences of transformation are not straightforward. This is not unexpected for a multigenic trait where the hierarchy of various aspects of tolerance may differ between and within species. The experimental evaluation of the response of transgenic plants to stress does not always match, in quality, the molecular biology.

We have advocated the use of physiological traits in breeding programmes as a process that can be undertaken at the present while more knowledge of the genetic basis of salt tolerance is obtained. The use of molecular biological techniques might aid plant breeders through the development of marker aided selection.

Key words

halophytes molecular biology molecular genetics plant breeding rice salinity saltaffected soils salt tolerance sodicity 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Agboma P. C., Jones M. G. K., Peltonen Sainio P., Rita H. and Pehu E. 1997. Exogenous glycinebetaine enhances grain yield of maize, sorghum and wheat grown under two supplementary watering regimes. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science-Zeitschrift Fur Acker Und Pflanzenbau 178: 29–37.Google Scholar
  2. Agboma P. C., Sinclair T. R., Jokinen K. and Peltonen Sainio P. 1997. An evaluation of the effect of exogenous glycinebetaine on the growth and yield of soybean: Timing of application, watering regimes and cultivars. Field Crops Research 54: 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmad S. 1990. Soil salinity and water management — keynote address. In: Proceedings of the Indo-Pak Workshop on Soil Salinity and Water Management. Director General, International Waterlogging and Salinity Research Institute (IWASRI): 3–18.Google Scholar
  4. Arakawa K., Mizuno K., Kishitani S. and Takabe T. 1992. Immunological studies of betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase in barley. Plant and Cell Physiology 33: 833–40.Google Scholar
  5. Bohnert H. J. and Jensen R. G. 1996. Metabolic engineering for increased salt tolerance — The next step — Comment. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 23: 661–6.Google Scholar
  6. Brunk D. G., Rich P. J. and Rhodes D. 1989. Genotypic variation for glycinebetaine among public inbreds of maize. Plant Physiology 91: 1122–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Broer I. 1996. Stress inactivation of foreign genes in transgenic plants. Field Crops Research: 45: 19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Colmer T. D., Epstein E. and Dvorak J. 1995. Differential solute regulation in leaf blades of various ages in salt-sensitive wheat and a salt-tolerant wheat x Lophopyrum elongatum (Host) A Love amphiploid. Plant Physiology 108: 1715–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Flowers T. J. and Yeo A. R. 1981. Variability of sodium chloride resistance within rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties. New Phytologist 88: 363–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Flowers T. J. and Dalmond D. 1992. Protein synthesis in halophytes — the influence of potassium, sodium and magnesium in vitro. Plant and Soil 146: 153–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Flowers T. J. and Yeo A. R. 1995. Breeding for salinity resistance in crop plants: where next? Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 22: 875–884.Google Scholar
  12. Flowers T. J., Flowers S. A. and Greenway H. 1986. Effects of sodium chloride on tobacco plants. Plant, Cell and Environment 9: 645–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gibon Y., Bessieres M. A. and Larher F. 1997. Is glycine betaine a non-compatible solute in higher plants that do not accumulate it? Plant Cell and Environment 20: 329–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Garcia A., Rizzo C.A., Ud-Din J., Bartos S.L., Senadhira D., Flowers T.J. and Yeo A.R. 1997. Sodium and potassium transport to the xylem are inherited independently in rice and the mechanism of sodium: potassium selectivity differs between rice and wheat. Plant, Cell and Environment 20: 1167–1174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ghassemi F., Jakeman A. J. and Nix H. A., 1995. Salinisation of Land and Water Resources. CAB International, Wallingford, 526 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Gorham J. 1996. Glycinebetaine is a major nitrogen-containing solute in the Malvaceae. Phytochemistry 43: 367–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gorham J., Forster B. P., Budrewicz E., Wyn Jones, R. G., Miller T. E. and Law C.N. 1986. Salt tolerance in the Triticeae: Solute accumulation and distribution in an Amphidiploid derived from Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese Spring and Thinopyrum bessarabicum. Journal of Experimental Botany 37: 1435–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grote E. M., Ejeta G. and Rhodes D. 1994. Inheritance of Glycinebetaine Deficiency in Sorghum. Crop Science 34: 1217–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grumet R. and Hanson A. D. 1987. Genetic evidence for an osmoregulatory function of glycinebetaine accumulation in Barley. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 13: 353–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hall J. L., Harvey D. M. R. and Flowers T. J. 1978. Evidence for the cytoplasmic localization of betaine in leaf cells of Suaeda maritima. Planta 140: 59–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hanson A. D., Rathinasabapathi B., Rivoal J., Burnet M., Dillon M. O. and Gage D. A. 1994. Osmoprotective compounds in the Plumbaginaceae — a natural experiment in metabolic engineering of stress tolerance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 91: 306–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harinasut P., Tsutsui K., Takabe T., Nomura M., Takabe T. and Kishitani S. 1996. Exogenous glycine-betaine accumulation and increased salt — tolerance in rice seedlings. Bioscience Biotechnology and Biochemistry 60: 366–8.Google Scholar
  23. Holmstrom K. O., Welin B., Mandal A., Kristiansdottir I., Teeri T. H., Lamark T., Strom A. R. and Palva E. T. 1994. Production of the Escherichia coli betaine-aldehyde dehydrogenase, an enzyme required for the synthesis of the osmoprotectant glycine betaine, in transgenic plants. Plant Journal 6: 749–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ishitani M., Nakamura T., Han S. Y. and Takabe T. 1995. Expression of the betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase gene in barley in response to osmotic stress and abscisic aicd. Plant Molecular Biology 27: 307–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jones P. W. and Cassells A. C. 1995. Criteria for decision making in crop improvement programmes — Technical considerations. Euphytica 85: 465–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Karakas B., OziasAkins P., Stushnoff C., Suefferheld M. and Rieger M. 1997. Salinity and drought tolerance of mannitol-accumulating transgenic tobacco. Plant Cell and Environment 20: 609–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lilius G., Holmberg N. and Bulow L. 1996. Enhanced NaCl stress tolerance in transgenic tobacco expressing bacterial choline dehydrogenase. Bio-Technology 14: 177–80.Google Scholar
  28. Lin C. C. and Kao C. H. 1995. NaCl stress in rice seedlings: Effects of L-proline, glycinebetaine, L-and D-asparagine on seedling growth. Biologia Plantarum 37: 305–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lone M. I., Kueh J. S. H., Wyn Jones R. G. and Bright S. W. J. 1987. Influence of proline and glycine-betaine, on salt tolerance of cultured barley embryos. Journal of Experimental Botany 38: 479–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Makela P., PeltonenSainio P., Jokinen K., Setala H., Hinkkanen R. and Somersalo S. 1996. Uptake and translocation of foliar-applied glycinebetaine in crop plants. Plant Science 121: 221–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marcum K. B. and Murdoch C. L. 1994. Salinity Tolerance Mechanisms of 6 C(4) Turfgrasses. Journal of the Society for Horticultural Science 119: 779–84.Google Scholar
  32. McLean W. F. H., Blunden G. and Jewers K. 1996. Quaternary ammonium-compounds in the Capparaceae. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 24: 427–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Monyo E. S., Ejeta G. and Rhodes D. 1992. Genotypic Variation for Glycinebetaine in Sorghum and Its Relationship to Agronomic and Morphological Traits. Maydica 37: 283–6.Google Scholar
  34. Murthy M. and Tester M. 1996. Compatible solutes and salt tolerance: Misuse of trangenic tobacco. Trends in Plant Science 1: 294–5.Google Scholar
  35. Nakamura T., Yokota S., Muramoto Y., Tsutsui K., Oguri Y., Fukui K. and Takabe T. 1997. Expression of a betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase gene in rice, a glycinebetaine nonaccumulator, and possible localization of its protein in peroxisomes. Plant Journal 11: 1115–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nolte K. D., Hanson A. D. and Gage D. A. 1997. Proline accumulation and methylation to proline betaine in Citrus: Implications for genetic engineering of stress resistance. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 122: 8–13.Google Scholar
  37. Rathinasabapathi B., Gage D. A., Mackill D. J. and Hanson A. D. 1993. Cultivated and wild rices do not accumulate glycinebetaine due to deficiencies in two biosynthetic steps. Crop Science 33: 534–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rathinasabapathi B., McCue K. F., Gage D. A. and Hanson A. D. 1994. Metabolic engineering of glycine betaine synthesis — plant betaine aldehyde dehydrogenases lacking typical transit peptides are targeted to tobacco chloroplasts where they confer betaine aldehyde resistance. Planta 193: 155–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rhodes D. and Rich P. J. 1988. Preliminary genetic studies of the phenotype of betaine deficiency in Zea mays L. Plant Physiology 88: 102–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Rhodes D., Rich P. J., Brunck D. G., Ju G. C., Rhodes J. C., Pauly M. H. and Hansen L. A. 1989. Development of two isogenic sweet corn hybrids differing for glycinebetaine content. Plant Physiology 91: 1121–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Saneoka H., Nagasaka C., Hahn D. T., Yang W. J., Premachandra G. S., Joly R. J., Rhodes D. 1995. Salt tolerance of glycinebetaine-deficient and glycinebetaine-containing maize lines. Plant Physiology 107:631–638.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Serrano R. 1996. Salt tolerance in plants and microorganisms: Toxicity targets and defense responses. In: International Review of Cytology. A Survey of Cell Biology, Vol 165, ed. by K W Jeon Academic Press Inc: 1–52.Google Scholar
  43. Storey R., Ahmad N. and Wyn Jones R. G. 1977. Taxonomic and ecological aspects of the distribution of glycinebetaine and related compounds in plats. Oecologia (Berl) 27: 319–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Szabolcs I. 1992. Salinization of soils and water and its relation to desertification. Desertification Control Bulletin 21: 32–37.Google Scholar
  45. Tarczynski M. C., Jensen R. G. and Bohnert H. J. 1993. Stress protection of transgenic tobacco by production of the osmolyte mannitol. Science 259: 508–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Thomas J. C., Sepahi M., Arendall B. and Bohnert H. J. 1995. Enhancement of seed germination in high salinity by engineering mannitol expression in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell and Environment 18: 801–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tuinstra M. R., Grote E. M., Goldsbrough P. B. and Ejeta G. 1996. Identification of quantitative trait loci associated with pre-flowering drought tolerance in sorghum. Crop Science 36: 1337–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Valenzuelasoto E. M. and Munozclares R. A. 1994. Purification and properties of betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase extracted from detached leaves of Amaranths-hypochondriacs L subjected to water-deficit. Journal of Plant Physiology 143: 145–52.Google Scholar
  49. Wood A. J., Saneoka H., Rhodes D., Joly R. J. and Goldsbrough P. B. 1996. Betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase in sorghum- Molecular cloning and expression of two related genes. Plant Physiology 110: 1301–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yang W. J., Nadolskaorczyk A., Wood K. V., Hahn D. T., Rich P. J., Wood A. J., Saneoka H., Premachandra G. S., Bonham C. C., Rhodes J. C., Joly R. J., Samaras Y., Goldsbrough P. B. and Rhodes D. 1995. Near-Isogenic Lines of Maize Differing For Glycinebetaine. Plant Physiology 107: 621–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yeo A. R., Yeo M. E., Flowers S. A. and Flowers T. J. 1990. Screening of rice (Oryza sativa L) genotypes for physiological characters contributing to salinity resistance and their relationship to overall performance. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 79: 397–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Department of Plant Physiology 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Timothy John Flowers
    • 1
  • Aurora Garcia
    • 1
  • Mikiko Koyama
    • 1
  • Anthony Richard Yeo
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Biological SciencesUniversity of Sussex, FalmerBrighton

Personalised recommendations