Genetic diversity of salt tolerance in tetraploid alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)

  • Mohamed Ali BenabderrahimEmail author
  • Marwa Guiza
  • Mansour Haddad
Original Article


Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L. subsp. sativa) is the most cultivated perennial forage crop worldwide. It is an autotetraploid (2n = 4x = 32), out-crossing species and it has potential to be cultivated in marginal lands affected by salinity. In this study, genetic diversity for salt tolerance was explored in 36 alfalfa genotypes from continental (15 genotypes) and coastal regions (21 genotypes), under salt stress of 150 mM NaCl. Also, characters and mechanisms that can be used to increase yield under saline conditions were investigated. All genotypes were clonally propagated into 144 seedlings (four plants/genotype) and designed in a randomized complete block under greenhouse conditions. Twelve tolerance traits were scored; fresh and dry aboveground biomasses, stem length, leaf number, [Na+], [K+], K+/Na+ ratio, catalases and superoxide dismutases, proteases, protein and reducing sugar in leaves. Stress tolerance index was calculated for each genotype. High significant variation was found among genotypes and treatments for fresh and dry matters. All genotypes had [Na+] in shoots significantly higher in stressed plants than in control plants and low K+/Na+ ratios, signifying the use of Na+ “inclusion mechanism” to prevent salt stress. The increase in catalase activity in shoots under salt condition demonstrates that this antioxidant enzyme could be playing an essential role in the tolerance mechanism. In contrast, it seems that alfalfa tolerance system to cope salt stress is not related to protease, superoxide dismutase, and proteins accumulation. Based on salt tolerance index and PCA analysis, three tolerant genotypes from coastal origin were selected that can be prominent sources for breeding program of alfalfa.


Tetraploid alfalfa Genotype Salt tolerance Ion homeostasis Enzymatic activities 



This research was supported in part by the research project PERMED «Improvement of native PERennial forage plants for the sustainability of MEDiterranean farming systems» funded by European Union.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.


  1. Annicchiarico P, Barrett B, Brummer EC, Julier B, Marshall AH (2015) Achievements and challenges in improving temperate perennial forage legumes. Crit Rev Plant Sci 34(1–3):327–380Google Scholar
  2. Anower MR, Mott IW, Peel MD, Wu Y (2013) Characterization of physiological responses of two alfalfa half-sib families with improved salt tolerance. Plant Physiol Bioch 71:103–111Google Scholar
  3. Basbag M, Aydin A, Sakiroglu M (2017) Evaluating agronomic performance and investigating molecular structure of drought and heat tolerant wild alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) collection from the Southeastern Turkey. Biochem Genet 55(1):63–76PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Benabderrahim MA, Hamza H, Haddad M, Ferchichi A (2015) Assessing the drought tolerance variability in Mediterranean alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) genotypes under arid conditions. Plant Biosyst 149(2):395–403Google Scholar
  5. Bhardwaj S, Sharma NK, Srivastava PK, Gaurav S (2010) Salt tolerance assessment in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) ecotypes. Bot Res J 3(1):1–6Google Scholar
  6. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–251PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Bright J, Desikan R, Hancock JT, Weir IS, Neill SJ (2006) ABA−induced NO generation and stomatal closure in Arabidopsis are dependent on H2O2 synthesis. Plant J 45:113–122PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Campanelli A, Ruta C, Morone-Fortunato I, De Mastro G (2013). Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) clones tolerant to salt stress: in vitro selection. Cent Eur J Biol 8(8):765–776Google Scholar
  9. Cavalcanti FR, Oliveira JTA, Martins-Miranda AS, Viégas RA, Silveira JAG (2004) Superoxide dismutase, catalase and peroxidase activities do not confer protection against oxidative damage in salt-stressed cowpea leaves. New Phytol 163(3):563–571Google Scholar
  10. Chunthaburee S, Dongsansuk A, Pattanagu IW, Theerakulpisut P (2016) Physiological and biochemical parameters for evaluation and clustering of rice cultivars differing in salt tolerance at seedling stage. Saudi J Bio Sci 23(4):467–477Google Scholar
  11. Cornacchione MV, Suarez DL (2017) Evaluation of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) populations’ response to salinity stress. Crop Sci 57(1):137–150Google Scholar
  12. Das K, Roychoudhury A (2014) Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and response of antioxidants as ROS-scavengers during environmental stress in plants. Front Environ Sci 2:53Google Scholar
  13. Dimitrova MS, Tishinova V, Velcheva V (1994) Combined effect of zinc and lead on the hepatic superoxide dismutase-catalase system in carp (Cyprinuscarpio). Comp BiochemPhysiol C Pharmacol 108(1):43–46Google Scholar
  14. Ekbic E, Cagıran C, Korkmaz K, Kose MA, Aras V (2017) Assessment of watermelon accessions for salt tolerance using stress tolerance indices. Ciênc Agrotec 41(6):616–625Google Scholar
  15. Eker S, Cömertpay G, Konuşkan Ö, Ülger AC, Öztürk L, Çakmak İ (2006) Effect of salinity stress on dry matter production and ion accumulation in hybrid maize varieties. Turk J Agric For 30(5):365–373Google Scholar
  16. El-Sharkawy MS, El-Beshsbeshy TR, Mahmoud EK, Abdelkader NI, Al-Shal RM, Missaoui AM (2017) Response of alfalfa under salt stress to the application of potassium sulfate nanoparticles. Am J Plant Sc 8(08):1751Google Scholar
  17. Fernandez GC (1992) Stress tolerance index a new indicator of tolerance. HortSc 27(6):626–626Google Scholar
  18. Flajoulot S, Ronfort J, Baudouin P, Barre P, Huguet T, Huyghe C, Julier B (2005) Genetic diversity among alfalfa (Medicago sativa) cultivars coming from a breeding program, using SSR markers. TheorAppl Genet 111(7):1420–1429Google Scholar
  19. Flowers TJ (2004) Improving crop salt tolerance. J Ex Bot 55(396):307–319Google Scholar
  20. Foyer CH, Noctor G (2005) Oxidant and antioxidant signalling in plants: a re-evaluation of the concept of oxidative stress in a physiological context. Plant Cell Environ 28(8):1056–1071Google Scholar
  21. Genc Y, Mcdonald GK, Tester M (2007) Reassessment of tissue Na+ concentration as a criterion for salinity tolerance in bread wheat. Plant Cell Environ 30(11):1486–1498PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Gupta B, Huang B (2014) Mechanism of salinity tolerance in plants: physiological, biochemical, and molecular characterization. Int J Genomics 2014:1–18Google Scholar
  23. Han Y, Khu DM, Monteros M J (2012) High-resolution melting analysis for SNP genotyping and mapping in tetraploid alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Mol Breed 29(2):489–501PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Hoagland DR, Arnon DI (1950) The water culture method for growing plants without soil. In: Circular. California agricultural experiment station, vol 347, 2nd edn. California, USAGoogle Scholar
  25. Iseki K, Takahashi Y, Muto C, Naito K, Tomooka N (2016) Diversity and evolution of salt tolerance in the genus Vigna. PLoS ONE 11(10):e0164711PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. James RA, Blake C, Byrt CS, Munns R (2011) Major genes for Na+ exclusion, Nax1 and Nax2 (wheat HKT1; 4 and HKT1; 5), decrease Na+ accumulation in bread wheat leaves under saline and waterlogged conditions. J Ex Bot 62(8):2939–2947Google Scholar
  27. Julier B, Huyghe C, Ecalle C (2000) Within-and among-cultivar genetic variation in alfalfa: forage quality, morphology, and yield. Crop Sci 40(2):365–369Google Scholar
  28. Julier B, Flajoulot S, Barre P, Cardinet G, Santoni S, Huguet T, Huyghe C (2003) Construction of two genetic linkage maps in cultivated tetraploid alfalfa (Medicago sativa) using microsatellite and AFLP markers. BMC Plant Biol 3(1):9PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Julier B, Semiani Y, Laouar M (2010) Genetic diversity in a collection of lucerne populations from the Mediterranean basin evaluated by SSR Markers. In Sustainable use of genetic diversity in forage and turf breeding. Springer, Dordrecht, (pp. 107–112)Google Scholar
  30. Katerji N, Van Hoorn JW, Hamdy A, Mastrorilli M, Fares C, Ceccarelli S, Oweis T (2006) Classification and salt tolerance analysis of barley varieties. Agric Water Manage 85(1–2):184–192Google Scholar
  31. Kerepesi I, Galiba G (2000) Osmotic and salt stress-induced alteration in soluble carbohydrate content in wheat seedlings. Crop Sci 40(2):482–487Google Scholar
  32. Kim J, Liu Y, Zhang X, Zhao B, Childs KL (2016) Analysis of salt-induced physiological and proline changes in 46 switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) lines indicates multiple response modes. Plant Physiol Bioch 105:203–212Google Scholar
  33. Konuşkan Ö, Gözübenli H, Atiş İ, Atak M (2017) Effects of salinity stress on emergence and seedling growth parameters of some maize genotypes (Zea mays L.). Turk J Agric Food Sci Tech 5(12):1668–1672Google Scholar
  34. Kumar R, Kaul J, Dubey RB, Singode A, Chikkappa GK, Manivannan A, Debnath MK (2015) Assessment of drought tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.) based on different indices. SABRAO J Breed Genet 47(3):291–298Google Scholar
  35. Lei Y, Xu Y, Hettenhausen C, Lu C, Shen G, Zhang C, Wu J (2018) Comparative analysis of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) leaf transcriptomes reveals genotype-specific salt tolerance mechanisms. BMC Plant Boil 18(1):35Google Scholar
  36. Li X, Brummer EC (2012) Applied genetics and genomics in alfalfa breeding. Agronomy 2(1):40–61Google Scholar
  37. Maas EV (1987) Salt tolerance of plants. In: Christie BR (ed) Handbook of plant science in agriculture. CRC Press, Boca, Raton, pp 55–75Google Scholar
  38. McDowell N, Pockman WT, Allen CD, Breshears DD, Cobb N, Kolb T, Yepez EA (2008) Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought? New Phytol 178(4):719–739PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Mittler R (2002) Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci 7(9):405–410PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Munns R (2002) Physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell Environ 25:239–250PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Munns R, Tester M (2008) Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Biol 59:651–681Google Scholar
  42. Munns R, James RA, Läuchli A (2006) Approaches to increasing the salt tolerance of wheat and other cereals. J Ex Bot 57(5):1025–1043Google Scholar
  43. Mzid R, Zorrig W, Ayed RB, Hamed KB, Ayadi M, Damak Y, Hanana M (2018) The grapevine VvWRKY2 gene enhances salt and osmotic stress tolerance in transgenic Nicotianatabacum. 3 Biotech 8(6):277Google Scholar
  44. Naeem MS, Jin ZL, Wan GL, Liu D, Liu HB, Yoneyama K, Zhou, WJ (2010) 5-Aminolevulinic acid improves photosynthetic gas exchange capacity and ion uptake under salinity stress in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Plant Soil 332(1–2):405–415Google Scholar
  45. Naeem MS, Rasheed M, Liu D, Jin ZL, Ming DF, Yoneyama K, Zhou WJ (2011) 5-Aminolevulinic acid ameliorates salinity-induced metabolic, water-related and biochemical changes in Brassica napus L. Acta Physiol Plant 33(2):517–528Google Scholar
  46. Naeem MS, Warusawitharana H, Liu H, Liu D, Ahmad R, Waraich EA, Zhou W (2012) 5-Aminolevulinic acid alleviates the salinity-induced changes in Brassica napus as revealed by the ultrastructural study of chloroplast. Plant Physiol Biochem 57:84–92PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Parida AK, Das AB, Mohanty P (2004) Investigations on the antioxidative defence responses to NaCl stress in a mangrove, Bruguieraparviflora: differential regulations of isoforms of some antioxidative enzymes. Plant Growth Regul 42(3):213–226Google Scholar
  48. Peng CL, Ou ZY, Liu N, Lin GZ (2005) Response to high temperature in flag leaves of super high-yielding rice Pei’ai 64S/E32 and Liangyoupeijiu. Rice Sci 12:179–186Google Scholar
  49. Perez-Alfocea F, Guerrier G, Estañ MT, Bolarin MC (1994) Comparative salt responses at cell and whole-plant levels of cultivated and wild tomato species and their hybrid. J Hortic Sci 69:639–644Google Scholar
  50. Platten JD, Egdane JA Ismail AM (2013) Salinity tolerance, Na+ exclusion and allele mining of HKT1; 5 in Oryza sativa and O. glaberrima: many sources, many genes, one mechanism?. BMC Plant Biol 13(1):32PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Rahnama A, James RA, Poustini K, Munns R (2010) Stomatal conductance as a screen for osmotic stress tolerance in durum wheat growing in saline soil. Funct Plant Biol 37(3):255–263Google Scholar
  52. Robins JG, Luth D, Campbell TA, Bauchan GR, He C, Viands DR, Brummer EC (2007) Genetic mapping of biomass production in tetraploid alfalfa. Crop Sci 47(1):1–10Google Scholar
  53. Sakiroglu M, Moore KJ, Brummer EC (2011) Variation in biomass yield, cell wall components, and agronomic traits in a broad range of diploid Alfalfa accessions. Crop Sci 51(5):1956–1964Google Scholar
  54. Sandhu D, Cornacchione MV, Ferreira JF, Suarez DL (2017) Variable salinity responses of 12 alfalfa genotypes and comparative expression analyses of salt-response genes. Sci Rep 7:42958PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Shabala S (2013) Learning from halophytes: physiological basis and strategies to improve abiotic stress tolerance in crops. Ann Bot 112(7):1209–1221PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Shim IS, Momose Y, Yamamoto A, Kim DW, Usui K (2003) Inhibition of catalase activity by oxidative stress and its relationship to salicylic acid accumulation in plants. Plant Growth Regul 39(3):285–292Google Scholar
  57. Singh M, Kumar J, Singh S, Singh VP, Prasad SM (2015) Roles of osmoprotectants in improving salinity and drought tolerance in plants: a review. Rev Environ Sci Bio 14(3):407–426Google Scholar
  58. Souid A, Gabriele M, Longo V, Pucci L, Bellani L, Smaoui A, Hamed KB (2016) Salt tolerance of the halophyte Limonium delicatulum is more associated with antioxidant enzyme activities than phenolic compounds. Funct Plant Biol 43(7):607–619Google Scholar
  59. Tanou G, Molassiotis A, Diamantidis G (2009) Hydrogen peroxide-and nitric oxide-induced systemic antioxidant prime-like activity under NaCl-stress and stress-free conditions in citrus plants. J Plant Physiol 166:1904–1913PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Tavakkoli E, Rengasamy P, McDonald GK (2010) High concentrations of Na+ and Cl-ions in soil solution have simultaneous detrimental effects on growth of faba bean under salinity stress. J Exp Bot 61(15):4449–4459PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Wang WB, Kim YH, Lee HS, Kim KY, Deng XP, Kwak SS (2009) Analysis of antioxidant enzyme activity during germination of alfalfa under salt and drought stresses. Plant Physiol Bioch 47(7):570–577Google Scholar
  62. Ye Y, Tam NF, Wong YS, Lu CY (2003) Growth and physiological responses of two mangrove species (Bruguiera gymnorrhiza and Kandelia candel) to waterlogging. Environ Exper Bot 49(3):209–221Google Scholar
  63. Yoshida Y, Marubodee R, Ogiso-Tanaka E, Iseki K, Isemura T, Takahashi Y, Ehara H (2016) Salt tolerance in wild relatives of adzuki bean, Vignaangularis (Willd.) OhwietOhashi. Genet Resour Crop Evol 63(4):627–637Google Scholar
  64. Zaki HE, Yokoi S (2016) A comparative in vitro study of salt tolerance in cultivated tomato and related wild species. Plant Biotchnol 33(5):361–372Google Scholar
  65. Zhang Z, Mao B, Li H, Zhou W, Takeuchi Y, Yoneyama K (2005) Effect of salinity on physiological characteristics, yield and quality of microtubers in vitro in potato. Acta Physiol Plant 27(4):481–489Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Franciszek Górski Institute of Plant Physiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohamed Ali Benabderrahim
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marwa Guiza
    • 2
  • Mansour Haddad
    • 1
  1. 1.Arid and Oases Cropping LaboratoryArid Lands InstituteMedenineTunisia
  2. 2.Biotechnology and Plant Improvement LaboratoryCentre of Biotechnology of SfaxUniversity of SfaxSfaxTunisia

Personalised recommendations