Advertisement

Acta Physiologiae Plantarum

, 40:202 | Cite as

Identification of salt-induced transcripts by suppression subtractive hybridization and their expression analysis under the combination of salt and elevated CO2 conditions in Salicornia brachiata

  • Jenifer Joseph Benjamin
  • Rani Krishnasamy
  • Saranya Jothiramshekar
  • Ganesan Govindan
  • Rajalakshmi Swaminathan
  • Ajay ParidaEmail author
Original Article
  • 108 Downloads

Abstract

Soil salinity is a major abiotic stress that affects global agricultural productivity. Exploring the mechanisms that halophytes employ to thrive and flourish under saline environments is essential to increase the salt tolerance in sensitive crop species. Of the three halophytes used in this study Salicornia brachiata and Suaeda maritima belong to the same family Chenopodiaceae, while Sesuvium portulacastrum, a mangrove-associated halophyte, belongs to the family Aizoaceae. Assuming that halophytes of same family share similar salt tolerance mechanisms, we generated a suppression subtractive hybridization (SSH1) cDNA library from salt-treated leaf tissues of S. brachiata as tester and that of S. maritima as driver to identify salt-responsive genes unique to S. brachiata. To elucidate the difference in salt-tolerance mechanisms, and to identify salt-tolerance mechanisms amongst different families of halophytes, SSH2 library was generated from salt-treated leaf tissue of S. brachiata as tester and that of S. portulacastrum as driver. Totally, 87 and 49 EST clones representing unique genes were obtained from SSH1 and SSH2 libraries, respectively. Examination of the expression patterns of 17 (SSH1) and 15 (SSH2) differentially expressed genes using semi-quantitative RT-PCR confirmed up-regulation of these genes in shoots in response to salt treatment and elevated CO2 condition, but to a different extent. This study has provided insights into the molecular responses of S. brachiata to salt stress and elevated CO2 conditions.

Keywords

Halophytes Suppression subtractive hybridization Semi-quantitative PCR Salt stress-elevated CO2 conditions 

Abbreviations

AC

Ambient CO2 without salt

EC

Elevated CO2 without salt

ACS

Ambient CO2 with salt

ECS

Elevated CO2 with salt

Notes

Acknowledgements

The financial support (Grant number BT/01/CEIB/09/V/08) from Department of Biotechnology, Government of India is acknowledged. We thank Dr. Vinoth, St. Xavier’s College, Palayamkottai for helpful suggestions.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11738_2018_2764_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (176 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 175 KB)
11738_2018_2764_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (160 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 160 KB)

References

  1. Al-Zahrani AHH (1997) Salt tolerance in the halophyte Halopeplis perfoliata (Forssk.) Bge. Ex. Schweinf: seasonal variations in ion concentrations. Indian J Plant Physiol 2:135–137Google Scholar
  2. Arnon DI (1949) Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol 24:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ball M, Munns R (1992) Plant responses to salinity under elevated atmospheric concentrations of CO2 Australian. J Bot 40:515–525Google Scholar
  4. Blackmore S, Wortley AH, Skvarla JJ, Rowley JR (2007) Pollen wall development in flowering plants. New Phytol 174:483–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown MS, Goldstein JL (1993) Mad bet for Rab. Nature 366:14–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Covington MF, Maloof JN, Straume M, Kay SA, Harmer SL (2008) Global transcriptome analysis reveals circadian regulation of key pathways in plant growth and development. Genome Biol 9:R130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diatchenko L et al (1996) Suppression subtractive hybridization: a method for generating differentially regulated or tissue-specific cDNA probes and libraries. Proc Natl Acad Sci 93:6025–6030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fu X et al (2005) Construction of a SSH library of Aegiceras corniculatum under salt stress and expression analysis of four transcripts. Plant Sci 169:147–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Geissler N, Hussin S, Koyro H-W (2008) Elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration ameliorates effects of NaCl salinity on photosynthesis and leaf structure of Aster tripolium L. J Exp Bol 60(1):137–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Geissler N, Hussin S, Koyro H-W (2010) Elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration enhances salinity tolerance in Aster tripolium L. Planta 231:583–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Glenn EP, Brown JJ, Blumwald E (1999) Salt tolerance and crop potential of halophytes. Crit Rev Plant Sci 18:227–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guo Z-F, Ou W-Z, Lu S-Y, Zhong Q (2006) Differential responses of antioxidative system to chilling and drought in four rice cultivars differing in sensitivity. Plant Physiol Biochem 44:828–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Habte E, Müller LM, Shtaya M, Davis SJ, KORFF M (2014) Osmotic stress at the barley root affects expression of circadian clock genes in the shoot. Plant Cell Environ 37:1321–1337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haydon MJ, Cobbett CS (2007) A novel major facilitator superfamily protein at the tonoplast influences zinc tolerance and accumulation in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 143:1705–1719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hodges DM, DeLong JM, Forney CF, Prange RK (1999) Improving the thiobarbituric acid-reactive-substances assay for estimating lipid peroxidation in plant tissues containing anthocyanin and other interfering compounds. Planta 207:604–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huang X, Madan A (1999) CAP3: a DNA sequence assembly program. Genome Res 9:868–877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jha B, Agarwal PK, Reddy PS, Lal S, Sopory SK, Reddy MK (2009) Identification of salt-induced genes from Salicornia brachiata, an extreme halophyte through expressed sequence tags analysis. Genes Genet Syst 84:111–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jha B, Sharma A, Mishra A (2011) Expression of SbGSTU (tau class glutathione S-transferase) gene isolated from Salicornia brachiata in tobacco for salt tolerance. Mol Biol Rep 38:4823–4832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Levitt J (1980) Responses of plants to environmental stress, vol 1. Chilling, freezing, and high temperature stresses. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Lezin G, Kosaka Y, Yost HJ, Kuehn MR, Brunelli L (2011) A one-step miniprep for the isolation of plasmid DNA and lambda phage particles. PLoS One 6:e23457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li X, Zhang L, Li Y, Ma L, Bu N, Ma C (2012) Changes in photosynthesis, antioxidant enzymes and lipid peroxidation in soybean seedlings exposed to UV-B radiation and/or Cd. Plant Soil 352:377–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lokhande VH, Nikam TD, Patade VY, Ahire ML, Suprasanna P (2011) Effects of optimal and supra-optimal salinity stress on antioxidative defence, osmolytes and in vitro growth responses in Sesuvium portulacastrum L. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 104(1):41–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Low R et al (1996) Early salt stress effects on the differential expression of vacuolar H+-ATPase genes in roots and leaves of Mesembryanthemum crystallinum. Plant Physiol 110:259–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lutts S, Kinet J, Bouharmont J (1996) NaCl-induced senescence in leaves of rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars differing in salinity resistance. Ann Bot 78:389–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marcolino-Gomes J et al (2014) Diurnal oscillations of soybean circadian clock and drought responsive genes. PLoS One 9:e86402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Monastersky R (2013) Global carbon dioxide levels near worrisome milestone. Nature 497(7447):13–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pao SS, Paulsen IT, Saier MH (1998) Major facilitator superfamily. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62:1–34PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Parida AK, Jha B (2013) Physiological and biochemical responses reveal the drought tolerance efficacy of the halophyte Salicornia brachiata. J Plant Growth Regul 32:342–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pérez-López U, Robredo A, Lacuesta M, Mena-Petite A, Munoz-Rueda A (2009) The impact of salt stress on the water status of barley plants is partially mitigated by elevated CO2. Environ Exp Bot 66:463–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pruneda-Paz JL, Kay SA (2010) An expanding universe of circadian networks in higher plants. Trends Plant Sci 15:259–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Qi C-H, Chen M, Song J, Wang B-S (2009) Increase in aquaporin activity is involved in leaf succulence of the euhalophyte Suaeda salsa under salinity. Plant Sci 176:200–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ramani B, Reeck T, Debez A, Stelzer R, Huchzermeyer B, Schmidt A, Papenbrock J (2006) Aster tripolium L. and Sesuvium portulacastrum L.: two halophytes, two strategies to survive in saline habitats. Plant Physiol Biochem 44:395–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ratajczak R (2000) Structure, function and regulation of the plant vacuolar H+-translocating ATPase. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA) Biomembr 1465:17–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rea PA (2007) Plant ATP-binding cassette transporters. Annu Rev Plant Biol 58:347–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Roden JS, Ball MC (1996) The effect of elevated [CO2] on growth and photosynthesis of two eucalyptus species exposed to high temperatures and water deficits. Plant Physiol 111:909–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rozema J et al (2001) UV-B absorbance and UV-B absorbing compounds (para-coumaric acid) in pollen and sporopollenin: the perspective to track historic UV-B levels. J Photochem Photobiol B 62:108–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schäffer AA et al (2001) Improving the accuracy of PSI-BLAST protein database searches with composition-based statistics and other refinements. Nucleic Acids Res 29:2994–3005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sebastiani L, Minnocci A, Tognetti R (2002) Genotypic differences in the response to elevated CO2 concentration of one-year-old olive cuttings (Olea europaea L. cv. Frantoio and Moraiolo) plant biosystems—an international journal dealing with all. Asp Plant Biol 136:199–207Google Scholar
  39. Shukla PS, Agarwal PK, Jha B (2012) Improved salinity tolerance of Arachishypogaea (L.) by the interaction of halotolerant plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria. J Plant Growth Regul 31:195–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Silva EN, Ferreira-Silva SL, de Vasconcelos Fontenele A, Ribeiro RV, Viégas RA, Silveira JAG (2010) Photosynthetic changes and protective mechanisms against oxidative damage subjected to isolated and combined drought and heat stresses in Jatropha curcas plants. J Plant Physiol 167:1157–1164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stanley OD (2008) Bio prospecting marine halophyte Salicornia brachiata for medical importance and salt encrusted land development. J Coast Dev 11:62–69Google Scholar
  42. Tufan F, Uçarlı C, Gürel F (2015) Analysis of expressed sequence tags from cDNA library of Fusarium culmorum infected barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) roots. Bioinformation 11:34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Urban O (2003) Physiological impacts of elevated CO2 concentration ranging from molecular to whole plant responses. Photosynthetica 41:9–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang S-M, Zhang J-L, Flowers TJ (2007) Low-affinity Na+ uptake in the halophyte Suaeda maritima. Plant Physiol 145:559–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yadav NS, Shukla PS, Jha A, Agarwal PK, Jha B (2012) The SbSOS1 gene from the extreme halophyte Salicornia brachiata enhances Na+ loading in xylem and confers salt tolerance in transgenic tobacco. BMC Plant Biol 12:188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yi C et al (2015) High atmospheric carbon dioxide-dependent alleviation of salt stress is linked to RESPIRATORY BURST OXIDASE 1 (RBOH1)-dependent H2O2 production in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). J Exp Bot 66:7391–7404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zdobnov EM, Apweiler R (2001) InterProScan—an integration platform for the signature-recognition methods in InterPro. Bioinformatics 17:847–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhang Z, Schwartz S, Wagner L, Miller W (2000) A greedy algorithm for aligning DNA sequences. J Comput Biol 7:203–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Franciszek Górski Institute of Plant Physiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jenifer Joseph Benjamin
    • 1
  • Rani Krishnasamy
    • 1
  • Saranya Jothiramshekar
    • 1
  • Ganesan Govindan
    • 1
    • 3
  • Rajalakshmi Swaminathan
    • 1
  • Ajay Parida
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Plant Molecular Biology LaboratoryM S Swaminathan Research FoundationChennaiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Biotechnology, Institute of Life SciencesGovernment of IndiaBhubaneswarIndia
  3. 3.Department of Genetic EngineeringSRM UniversityKattankulathurIndia

Personalised recommendations