Identification and transcriptional analysis of dehydrin gene family in cucumber (Cucumis sativus)

  • Yong Zhou
  • Lifang Hu
  • Shuiyan Xu
  • Lunwei Jiang
  • Shiqiang LiuEmail author
Original Article


Dehydrins (DHNs) are a group II late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins that play essential roles in plant growth, development and responses to diverse environmental stimuli. Here, four DHNs in cucumber genome were identified using bioinformatics-based methods according to the highly conserved K-, Y- and S-segments, including 1 YnKn-type, 2 YnSKn-type, and 1 SKn-type DHNs. All of them are intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) and possess a large number of disorder-promoting amino acids. Secondary structure prediction revealed that each of them is composed of high proportion of alpha helix and random coil. Gene structure and phylogenetic analyses with DHNs from cucumber and several other species revealed that some closely related DHN genes had similar gene structures. A number of cis-elements involved in stress responses and phytohormones were found in each CsDHN promoter. The tissue expression profiles suggested that the CsDHN genes have overlapping, but different expression patterns. qRT-PCR results showed that three selected CsDHN genes could respond to heat, cold, osmotic and salt stresses, as well as to signaling molecules such as H2O2 and ABA. These results lay a solid foundation for future functional investigation of the cucumber dehydrin gene family in tissue development and stress responses in plants.


Cucumber Dehydrin (DHN) Gene family Intrinsically disordered protein (IDP) Expression pattern Abiotic stress 



This work was financially supported by the Key Project of Youth Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province (20171ACB21025), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31460522 and 31660578).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Supplementary material

11738_2018_2715_MOESM1_ESM.doc (43 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 43 KB)
11738_2018_2715_MOESM2_ESM.doc (84 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOC 84 KB)
11738_2018_2715_MOESM3_ESM.xls (34 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (XLS 33 KB)


  1. Abedini R, GhaneGolmohammadi F, PishkamRad R, Pourabed E, Jafarnezhad A, Shobbar ZS et al (2017) Plant dehydrins: shedding light on structure and expression patterns of dehydrin gene family in barley. J Plant Res 130:747–763CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Aguayo P, Sanhueza J, Noriega F, Ochoa M, Lefeuvre R, Navarrete D et al (2016) Overexpression of an SKn-dehydrin gene from Eucalyptus globulus and Eucalyptus nitens enhances tolerance to freezing stress in Arabidopsis. Trees 30:1785–1797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Altunoglu YC, Baloglu P, Yer EN, Pekol S, Baloglu MC (2016) Identification and expression analysis of LEA gene family members in cucumber genome. Plant Growth Regul 80:225–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banerjee A, Roychoudhury A (2016) Group II late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins: structural and functional aspects in plant abiotic stress. Plant Growth Regul 79:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brini F, Hanin M, Lumbreras V, Amara I, Khoudi H, Hassairi A et al (2007) Overexpression of wheat dehydrin DHN-5 enhances tolerance to salt and osmotic stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Rep 26:2017–2026CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cao J, Li X (2015) Identification and phylogenetic analysis of late embryogenesis abundant proteins family in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). Planta 241:757–772CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cao Y, Xiang X, Geng M, You Q, Huang X (2017) Effect of HbDHN1 and HbDHN2 genes on abiotic stress responses in Arabidopsis. Front Plant Sci 8:470PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Charfeddine S, Charfeddine M, Saïdi MN, Jbir R, Bouzid RG (2017) Potato dehydrins present high intrinsic disorder and are differentially expressed under ABA and abiotic stresses. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 128:423–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen RG, Jing H, Guo WL, Wang SB, Ma F, Pan BG et al (2015) Silencing of dehydrin CaDHN1 diminishes tolerance to multiple abiotic stresses in Capsicum annuum L. Plant Cell Rep 34:2189–2200CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Chiappetta A, Muto A, Bruno L, Woloszynska M, Van Lijsebettens M, Bitonti MB (2015) A dehydrin gene isolated from feral olive enhances drought tolerance in Arabidopsis transgenic plants. Front Plant Sci 6:392CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Close TJ (1996) Dehydrins: emergence of a biochemical role of a family of plant dehydration proteins. Physiol Plant 97:795–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eriksson SK, Kutzer M, Procek J, Grobner G, Harryson P (2011) Tunable membrane binding of the intrinsically disordered dehydrin Lti30, a cold-induced plant stress protein. Plant Cell 23:2391–2404CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Figueras M, Pujal J, Saleh A, Save R, Goday A (2004) Maize Rab17 overexpression in Arabidopsis plants promotes osmotic stress tolerance. Ann Appl Biol 144:251–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Finn RD, Coggill P, Eberhardt RY, Eddy SR, Mistry J, Mitchell AL et al (2016) The Pfam protein families database: towards a more sustainable future. Nucleic Acids Res 44:D279–D285CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Flagel LE, Wendel JF (2009) Gene duplication and evolutionary novelty in plants. New Phytol 183:557–564CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gasteiger E, Hoogland C, Gattiker A, Duvaud SE, Wilkins MR, Appel RD et al (2005) Protein identification and analysis tools on the ExPASy server. In: Walker JM (ed) The proteomics protocols handbook. Humana Press, Totowa, pp 571–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Geourjon C, Deléage G (1995) SOPMA: significant improvements in protein secondary structure prediction by consensus prediction from multiple alignments. Bioinformatics 11:681–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Graether SP, Boddington KF (2014) Disorder and function: a review of the dehydrin protein family. Front Plant Sci 5:576CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Guo M, Yin YX, Ji JJ, Ma BP, Lu MH, Gong ZH (2014) Cloning and expression analysis of heat-shock transcription factor gene CaHsfA2 from pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Genet Mol Res 13:1865–1875CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Guo X, Zhang L, Zhu J, Liu H, Wang A (2017) Cloning and characterization of SiDHN, a novel dehydrin gene from Saussurea involucrata Kar. et Kir. that enhances cold and drought tolerance in tobacco. Plant Sci 256:160–169CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Halder T, Upadhyaya G, Ray S (2017) YSK2 type dehydrin (SbDhn1) from Sorghum bicolor showed improved protection under high temperature and osmotic stress condition. Front Plant Sci 8:918CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Hanin M, Brini F, Ebel C, Toda Y, Takeda S, Masmoudi K (2011) Plant dehydrins and stress tolerance: versatile proteins for complex mechanisms. Plant Signal Behav 6:1503–1509CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Hara M, Endo T, Kamiya K, Kameyama A (2017) The role of hydrophobic amino acids of K-segments in the cryoprotection of lactate dehydrogenase by dehydrins. J Plant Physiol 210:18–23CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hill W, Jin XL, Zhang XH (2016) Expression of an arctic chickweed dehydrin, CarDHN, enhances tolerance to abiotic stress in tobacco plants. Plant Growth Regul 80:323–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Houde M, Dallaire S, N’Dong D, Sarhan F (2004) Overexpression of the acidic dehydrin WCOR410 improves freezing tolerance in transgenic strawberry leaves. Plant Biotechnol J 2:381–387CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hu B, Jin J, Guo AY, Zhang H, Luo J, Gao G (2015) GSDS 2.0: an upgraded gene feature visualization server. Bioinformatics 31:1296–1297CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Hu L, Yang Y, Jiang L, Liu S (2016) The catalase gene family in cucumber: genome-wide identification and organization. Genet Mol Biol 39:408–415CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Huang S, Li R, Zhang Z, Li L, Gu X, Fan W et al (2009) The genome of the cucumber, Cucumis sativus L. Nat Genet 41:1275–1281CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hundertmark M, Hincha DK (2008) LEA (late embryogenesis abundant) proteins and their encoding genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Genom 9:118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hussain S, Niu Q, Qian M, Bai S, Teng Y (2015) Genome-wide identification, characterization, and expression analysis of the dehydrin gene family in Asian pear (Pyrus pyrifolia). Tree Genet Genomes 11:110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ishida T, Kinoshita K (2007) PrDOS: prediction of disordered protein regions from amino acid sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 35:W460–W464CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Jing H, Li C, Ma F, Ma JH, Khan A, Wang X et al (2016) Genome-wide identification, expression diversication of dehydrin gene family and characterization of CaDHN3 in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). PLoS One 11:e0161073CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Karami A, Shahbazi M, Niknam V, Shobbar ZS, Tafreshi RS, Abedini R et al (2013) Expression analysis of dehydrin multigene family across tolerant and susceptible barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes in response to terminal drought stress. Acta Physiol Plant 35:2289–2297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Koag MC, Wilkens S, Fenton RD, Resnik J, Vo E, Close TJ (2009) The K-segment of maize DHN1 mediates binding to anionic phospholipid vesicles and concomitant structural changes. Plant Physiol 150:1503–1514CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Kong X, Lv W, Jiang S, Zhang D, Cai G, Pan J et al (2013) Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of calcium-dependent protein kinase in maize. BMC Genom 14:433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kumar M, Lee SC, Kim JY, Kim SJ, Kim SR (2014) Over-expression of dehydrin gene, OsDhn1, improves drought and salt stress tolerance through scavenging of reactive oxygen species in rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Plant Biol 57:383–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H et al (2007) Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23:2947–2948CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Lescot M, Dehais P, Thijs G, Marchal K, Moreau Y, Van de Peer Y et al (2002) PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 30:325–327CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Letunic I, Bork P (2018) 20 years of the SMART protein domain annotation resource. Nucleic Acids Res 46:D493–D496CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Liang D, Xia H, Wu S, Ma F (2012) Genome-wide identification and expression profiling of dehydrin gene family in Malus domestica. Mol Biol Rep 39:10759–10768CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Liu CC, Li CM, Liu BG, Ge SJ, Dong XM, Li W et al (2012) Genome-wide identification and characterization of a dehydrin gene family in poplar (Populus trichocarpa). Plant Mol Biol Rep 30:848–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2–∆∆CT method. Methods 25:402–408CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Lv DW, Subburaj S, Cao M, Yan X, Li X, Appels R et al (2014) Proteome and phosphoproteome characterization reveals new response and defense mechanisms of Brachypodium distachyon leaves under salt stress. Mol Cell Proteom 13:632–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lv A, Fan N, Xie J, Yuan S, An Y, Zhou P (2017) Expression of CdDHN4, a novel YSK2-type dehydrin gene from Bermudagrass, responses to drought stress through the ABA-dependent signal pathway. Front Plant Sci 8:748CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Malik AA, Veltri M, Boddington KF, Singh KK, Graether SP (2017) Genome analysis of conserved dehydrin motifs in vascular plants. Front Plant Sci 8:709CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Mattick JS, Gagen MJ (2001) The evolution of controlled multitasked gene networks: the role of introns and other noncoding RNAs in the development of complex organisms. Mol Biol Evol 18:1611–1630CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Munoz-Mayor A, Pineda B, Garcia-Abellan JO, Anton T, Garcia-Sogo B, Sanchez-Bel P et al (2012) Overexpression of dehydrin tas14 gene improves the osmotic stress imposed by drought and salinity in tomato. J Plant Physiol 169:459–468CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Peng Y, Reyes JL, Wei H, Yang Y, Karlson D, Covarrubias AA et al (2008) RcDhn5, a cold acclimation-responsive dehydrin from Rhododendron catawbiense rescues enzyme activity from dehydration effects in vitro and enhances freezing tolerance in RcDhn5-overexpressing Arabidopsis plants. Physiol Plant 134:583–597CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Perdiguero P, Collada C, Soto A (2014) Novel dehydrins lacking complete K-segments in Pinaceae. The exception rather than the rule. Front Plant Sci 5:682CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Rodziewicz P, Swarcewicz B, Chmielewska K, Wojakowska A, Stobiecki M (2014) Influence of abiotic stresses on plant proteome and metabolome changes. Acta Physiol Plant 36:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rorat T (2006) Plant dehydrins—tissue location, structure and function. Cell Mol Biol Lett 11:536–556CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Saibi W, Feki K, Ben Mahmoud R, Brini F (2015) Durum wheat dehydrin (DHN-5) confers salinity tolerance to transgenic Arabidopsis plants through the regulation of proline metabolism and ROS scavenging system. Planta 242:1187–1194CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Shekhawat UKS, Srinivas L, Ganapathi TR (2011) MusaDHN-1, a novel multiple stress-inducible SK3-type dehydrin gene, contributes affirmatively to drought- and salt-stress tolerance in banana. Planta 234:915CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Seki M (2003) Regulatory network of gene expression in the drought and cold stress responses. Curr Opin Plant Biol 6:410–417CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28:2731–2739CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Tompa P (2002) Intrinsically unstructured proteins. Trends Biochem Sci 27:527–533CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Tompa P, Szasz C, Buday L (2005) Structural disorder throws new light on moonlighting. Trends Biochem Sci 30:484–489CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Verma G, Dhar YV, Srivastava D, Kidwai M, Chauhan PS, Bag SK et al (2017) Genome-wide analysis of rice dehydrin gene family: its evolutionary conservedness and expression pattern in response to PEG induced dehydration stress. PLoS One 12:e0176399CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Vlad F, Turk BE, Peynot P, Leung J, Merlot S (2008) A versatile strategy to define the phosphorylation preferences of plant protein kinases and screen for putative substrates. Plant J 55:104–117CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Wang XS, Zhu HB, Jin GL, Liu HL, Wu WR, Zhu J (2007) Genome-scale identification and analysis of LEA genes in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Sci 172:414–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yang Y, He M, Zhu Z, Li S, Xu Y, Zhang C et al (2012) Identification of the dehydrin gene family from grapevine species and analysis of their responsiveness to various forms of abiotic and biotic stress. BMC Plant Biol 12:140CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Yin Z, Rorat T, Szabala BM, Ziołkowska A, Malepszy S (2006) Expression of a Solanum sogarandinum SK3-type dehydrin enhances cold tolerance in transgenic cucumber seedlings. Plant Sci 170:1164–1172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhou Y, He P, Xu Y, Liu Q, Yang Y, Liu S (2017a) Overexpression of CsLEA11, a Y3SK2-type dehydrin gene from cucumber (Cucumis sativus), enhances tolerance to heat and cold in Escherichia coli. AMB Express 7:182CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Zhou Y, Hu L, Jiang L, Liu H, Liu S (2017b) Molecular cloning and characterization of an ASR gene from Cucumis sativus. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 130:553–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zhou Y, Hu L, Wu H, Jiang L, Liu S (2017c) Genome-wide identification and transcriptional expression analysis of cucumber superoxide dismutase (SOD) family in response to various abiotic stresses. Int J Genom 2017:7243973Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Franciszek Górski Institute of Plant Physiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of ScienceJiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang Economic and Technological Development DistrictNanchangChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Education, College of AgronomyJiangxi Agricultural UniversityNanchangChina

Personalised recommendations