Acta Physiologiae Plantarum

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 1479–1491 | Cite as

Leaf structural modifications for drought tolerance in some differentially adapted ecotypes of blue panic (Panicum antidotale Retz.)

  • Mansoor Hameed
  • Saima Batool
  • Nargis Naz
  • Tahira Nawaz
  • Muhammad Ashraf
Original Paper

Abstract

Some ecologically different ecotypes of Panicum antidotale Retz. were evaluated for drought tolerance in relation to growth parameters and leaf structural modifications. These ecotypes were adapted to normal non-stressed (agricultural field AF, and sludge of disposal channel SDC), drought-stressed (along roadside AR), salinity-stressed (forest plantation FP), waterlogging and salinity-stressed (inside disposal channel IDC), and drought plus salinity-stressed (barren area BA). On the basis of genetic variability in leaf structural modifications, each ecotype adopted specific strategies to tolerate the extremity of drought stress. The AF and SDC ecotypes relied on water conservation and survival rather than growth and structural modifications by developing epidermis and sclerenchyma on both leaf surfaces. The AR developed xerophytic foliar characteristics in addition to maintaining growth and development under stressed conditions like thick leaves, well-developed bulliform cells, and intensive sclerification. The FP ecotype developed efficient strategy for drought tolerance such as reduced and fibrous leaves, smaller metaxylem vessels, and highly developed bulliform cells. The ecotype IDC relied more on water conservation by increasing leaf epidermal thickness and decreasing stomatal area and density. The ecotype BA showed critical structural adaptations such as thin leaves, extremely developed bulliform and reduced metaxylem area, and parenchyma extensions above vascular bundles. Based on the strategies adopted for drought tolerance, the tolerance level of these ecotypes were rated as BA > AR > FP > IDC > SDC > AF.

Keywords

Bulliform cells Sclerification Genetic variability Panicum antidotale Drought tolerance 

References

  1. Abdel CG, Al-Rawi IMT (2011) Anatomical alteration in response to irrigation and water stress in some legume crops. Am J Exp Agri 1:231–264Google Scholar
  2. Abernethy GA, Fountain DW, Mcmanus MT (1998) Observations on the leaf anatomy of Festuca novae-zelandiae and biochemical responses to a water deficit. NZ J Bot 36:113–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmad MSA, Ashraf M, Ali Q (2010) Soil salinity as a selection pressure is a key determinant for the evolution of salt tolerance in Blue Panicgrass (Panicum antidotale Retz.). Flora 205:37–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alvarez JM, Rocha JF, Machado SR (2008) Bulliform cells in Loudetiopsis chrysothrix (Nees) Conert and Tristachya leiostachya Nees (Poaceae): structure in relation to function. Braz Arch Biol Tech 51:113–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alves AAC, Setter TL (2000) Response of cassava to water deficit: Leaf area growth and abscisic acid. Crop Sci 40:131–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ashraf M (2003) Relationships between leaf gas exchange characteristics and growth of differently adapted populations of Blue panicgrass (Panicum antidotale Retz.) under salinity or waterlogging. Plant Sci 165:69–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bacelar EA, Correia CM, Moutinho-Pereira JM, Gonçalves BC, Lopes JI, Torres-Pereira JM (2004) Sclerophylly and leaf anatomical traits of five field-grown olive cultivars growing under drought conditions. Tree Physiol 24:233–239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Balsamo RA, Willigen CV, Bauer AM, Farrant J (2006) Drought tolerance of selected Eragrostis species correlates with leaf tensile properties. Ann Bot 97:985–991PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beyschlag W, Pfanz H (1990) A fast method to detect the occurrence of non homogenous distribution of stomatal aperture in heterobaric plant leaves. Oecologia 82:52–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bittman S, Simpson GM (1989) Drought effect on leaf conductance and leaf rolling in forage grasses. Crop Sci 29:338–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bokhari UG, Alyacesh F, Nori M (1987) Adaptive strategies of desert grasses in Saudi Arabia. J Range Manage 40:19–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bruce WB, Edmeades GO, Barker TC (2002) Molecular and physiological approaches to maize improvement to drought tolerance. J Exp Bot 53:13–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chaudhary SA (1989) Grasses of Saudi Arabia. Riyadh: Ministry of Agriculture and WaterGoogle Scholar
  14. Chaves MM, Oliveira MM (2004) Mechanisms underlying plant resilience to water deficits: prospects for water-saving agriculture. J Exp Bot 55:2365–2384PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen F, Reddy MSS, Temple S, Jackson L, Shadle G, Dixon RA (2006) Multisite genetic modulation of monolignol biosynthesis suggests new routes for formation of syringyl lignin and wall-bound ferulic acid in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Plant J 48:113–124PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. da Silva RM, Bandel G, Martins PS (2003) Mating system in an experimental garden composed of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) ethnovarieties. Euphytica 134:127–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. de Pereira-Netto AB, Gabriele AC, Pinto HS (1999) Aspects of leaf anatomy of kudzu (Pueraria lobata, Leguminosae-Faboideae) related to water and energy balance. Pesq Agropec Bras 34:1361–1365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ellsworth DS (1999) CO2 enrichment in a maturing pine forest: are CO2 exchange and water status in the canopy affected? Plant Cell Environ 22:461–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ennajeh M, Vadel AM, Cochard H, Khemira H (2010) Comparative impacts of water stress on the leaf anatomy of a drought-resistant and a drought-sensitive olive cultivar. J Hort Sci Biotechnol 85:289–294Google Scholar
  20. Fahn A, Cutler DF (1992) Xerophytes. Gebruder Borntraeger, Berlin, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  21. Flowers TJ, Colmer TD (2008) Salinity tolerance in halophytes. New Phytol 179:945–963PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gibson DJ (2009) Grasses and grassland ecology. University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  23. Hameed M, Ashraf M (2008) Panicum antidotale: a potential grass for salt affected soils. In: Kafi M, Ajmal Khan M (eds) Crop and forage production using saline waters. Daya Publishing House, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  24. Hameed M, Ashraf M, Naz N (2009) Anatomical adaptations to salinity in cogon grass [Imperata cylindrica (L.) Raeuschel] from the Salt Range. Pak Plant Soil 322:229–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jacobs SWL, Wall CA (1993) Paspalum. In: Harden GJ (ed) Flora of New South Wales, vol 4. University of NSW Press, KensingtonGoogle Scholar
  26. Jane WN, Chiang SHT (1991) Morphology and development of bulliform cells in Arundo formosana Hack. Taiwania 36:85–97Google Scholar
  27. Kamel A, Loser DM (1995) Contribution of carbohydrates and other solutes to osmotic adjustment in wheat leaves under water stress. J Plant Physiol 145:363–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kondoh S, Yahata H, Nakashizuka T, Kondoh M (2006) Interspecific variation in vessel size, growth and drought tolerance of broad-leaved trees in semi-arid regions of Kenya. Tree Physiol 26:899–904PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Levitt J (1980) Responses of plants to environmental stresses. Vol. I. Chilling, freezing, and high temperature stress. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. Matsuda K, Rayan A (1990) Anatomy: a key factor regulating plant tissue response to water stress. In: Kafterman F (ed) Environmental injury to plants. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  31. Miyazawa SI, Terashima I (2001) Slow development of leaf photosynthesis in an evergreen broad-leaved tree, Castanopsis sieboldii: relationships between leaf anatomical characteristics and photosynthetic rate. Plant Cell Environ 24:279–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mott KA, Gibson AC, O’leary JW (1982) The adaptative significance of amphistomatic leaves. Plant Cell Environ 5:455–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nawazish S, Hameed M, Naurin S (2006) Leaf anatomical adaptations of Cenchrus ciliaris L. from the Salt Range, Pakistan against drought stress. Pak J Bot 38:1723–1730Google Scholar
  34. Parveen S, Qamar IA, Ali A, Arshad M (2001) Effect of legume-grass mixture on forage yield and quality in the Pothwar plateau of Pakistan. J Biol Sci 1:809–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pitman WD, Holt EC, Conrad BE, Bashaw EC (1983) Histological differences in moisture-stressed and nonstressed kleingrass forage. Crop Sci 23:793–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Price AH, Cairns JE, Horton P, Jones HG, Griffiths H (2002) Linking drought-resistance mechanisms to drought avoidance in upland rice using a QTL approach: progress and new opportunities to integrate stomatal and mesophyll responses. J Exp Bot 53:989–1004PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rascio A, Cedola MC, Toponi M, Flagella Z, Wittmer G (1990) Leaf morphology and water status changes in Triticum durum under water stress. Physiol Plant 78:462–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rhizopoulou S, Psaras G (2003) Development and structure of drought tolerant leaves of the Mediterranean shrub Capparis spinosa L. Ann Bot 92:377–383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ristic Z, Cass DD (1991) Leaf anatomy of Zea mays L. in response to water shortage and high temperature: a comparison of drought-resistant and drought-sensitive lines. Bot Gaz 152:173–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ruzin SE (1999) Plant microtechnique and microscopy. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  41. Samarakoon AB, Gifford RM (1995) Soil water content under plants at high CO2 concentration and interactions with direct CO2 effects: a species comparison. J Biogeog 22:193–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stewart JD, Zine E, Abidine A, Bernier PY (1994) Stomatal and mesophyll limitations of photosynthesis in black spruce seedlings during multiple cycles of drought. Tree Physiol 15:57–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stone PJ, Wilson DR, Reid JB, Gillespie RN (2001) Water deficit effects on sweet corn. I. Water use, radiation use efficiency, growth, and yield. Aust J Agric Res 52:103–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Terashima I (1992) Anatomy of non-uniform leaf photosynthesis. Photosyn Res 31:195–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Volaire F (2008) Plant traits and functional types to characterize drought survival of pluri-specific perennial herbaceous swards in Mediterranean areas. Eur J Agron 29:116–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Weerathaworn P, Soldati A, Stamp P (1992) Anatomy of seedling roots of tropical maize (Zea mays L.) cultivars at low water supply. J Exp Bot 43:1015–1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yiotis C, Manetas Y, Psaras GK (2006) Leaf and stem anatomy of the drought deciduous mediterranean shrub Calicotome villosa (Poiret) link. (Leguminosae). Flora 210:102–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Franciszek Górski Institute of Plant Physiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mansoor Hameed
    • 1
  • Saima Batool
    • 1
  • Nargis Naz
    • 1
  • Tahira Nawaz
    • 1
  • Muhammad Ashraf
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of BotanyUniversity of AgricultureFaisalabadPakistan
  2. 2.Department of Botany and MicrobiologyKing Saud UniversityRiyadhSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations