Advertisement

Acta Physiologiae Plantarum

, Volume 32, Issue 6, pp 1177–1187 | Cite as

Induction of systemic resistance by mixtures of antagonist bacteria for the management of crown rot complex on banana

  • G. Sangeetha
  • R. Thangavelu
  • S. Usha Rani
  • A. Muthukumar
  • R. Udayakumar
Original Paper

Abstract

Among nine native bacterial strains isolated from banana fruit surface and rhizosphere and six bacterial strains introduced from the culture collection, three native strains viz., non-fluorescent Pseudomonas (NFP6), Pseudomonas fluorescens (Pf3a), and Bacillus subtilis (BS1); and two bacterial strains from culture collection viz., Azospirillum (AS1) and Azotobacter (AZ1) have recorded maximum inhibition of mycelial growth of crown rot pathogens (Lasiodiplodia theobromae and Colletotrichum musae) under in vitro condition. When these effective bacterial strains were treated on banana fruits under in vivo, significant reduction of crown rot disease and increased shelf life of banana was observed. However, bacterial strains applied as three way combinations (NFP6 + Pf3a + BS1) had greater effect compared with individual and two way combination of bacterial antagonist treatments. The effect of crown rot disease reduction was also comparable to that of fungicide Benomyl (0.1%) both under cold and room temperature storage conditions. Besides, the induction of defense-related enzymes such as phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL), peroxidase (PO), polyphenoloxidase (PPO), and the accumulation of phenolics in banana fruit due to the application of bacterial antagonists were also studied at five different time intervals viz. 0th, 1st, 3rd, 5th and 7th days after treatment. When banana fruits treated with bacterial antagonists (individually and also in different combinations) and challenge-inoculated with crown rot pathogens, up to fourfold increase in defense-related enzymes and 3.6 fold increase in phenolic content was observed compared with control. The activity of these defense-related enzymes and phenolic content had gradually increased from 1st day after treatment to 3rd after treatment and reached their peak on 5th day after treatment. Among the bacterial antagonists which have been applied individually and in different combinations, the banana fruits treated with three-way antagonist mixture, i.e., NFP6 + Pf3a + BS1 recorded maximum induction of defense-related enzymes and accumulation of phenolics compared with individual and two-way combination of antagonist mixtures. This study suggest that the increased induction of defense-related enzymes and phenolic content due to the treatment of banana fruits with bacterial antagonists might have involved in the reduction of crown rot severity and in turn increased the shelf life of banana fruits.

Keywords

Banana Crown rot complex Lasiodiplodia theobromae Colletotrichum musae Bacterial antagonist mixture Induced systemic resistance Shelf life 

List of abbreviations

NFP

Non-fluorescent Pseudomonas

Pf

Pseudomonas fluorescens

BS

Bacillus subtilis

AS

Azospirillum

AZ

Azotobacter

Notes

Acknowledgments

Authors are grateful to Dr. A. Anandan, Sr. Lecturer, Department of Agricultural Botany, Annamalai University for his help rendered during statistical analysis.

References

  1. Aharoni Y, Fallik E, Copel A, Gil M, Gringerg S, Klien JD (1997) Sodium bicarbonate reduces post harvest decay development of melons. Postharvest Biol Technol 10:201–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alstrom S (1991) Induction of disease resistance in common bean susceptible to halo blight bacterial pathogen after seed bacterization with rhizosphere pseudomonads. J Gen Appl Microbiol 37:495–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anjaiah V, Koedam N, Nowak-Thompson B, Loper JE, Hofte M, Tambong JT, Cornelis P (1998) Involvement of phenazines and anthranilate in the antagonism of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PNA1 and Tn5 derivative toward Fusarium spp. and Pythium spp. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 11:847–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Backman PA, Wilson M, Murphy JF (1997) Bacteria for biological control of plant diseases. In: Rechcigl NA, Rechcigl JE (eds) Environmentally safe approaches to crop disease control. CRC Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, pp 95–109Google Scholar
  5. Bell JN, Dixon RA, Bailey JA, Rowell PM, Lamb CJ (1984) Differential induction of chalcone synthase mRNA activity at the onset of phytoalexin accumulation in compatible and in compatible plant–pathogen interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:3384–3388CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bharathi R, Vivekananthan R, Harish S, Ramanathan A, Samiyappan R (2004) Rhizobacteria-based bioformulations for the management of fruit rot infection in chillies. Crop Prot 23:835–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chalutz E, Wilson CL (1990) Postharvest biocontrol of green and blue mold and sour rot of citrus fruit by Debaryomyces hansenii. Plant Dis 74:134–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen C, Belanger R, Benhamou N, Paultiz TC (2000) Defense enzymes induced in cucumber roots by treatment with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and Pythium aphanidermatum. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 56:13–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deborah SD, Palaniswami A, Vidhyasekaran P, Velazhahan R (2001) Time course study of the induction of defense enzymes, phenolics and lignin in rice in response to infection by pathogen and non-pathogen. J Plant Dis Prot 108:204–216Google Scholar
  10. Dickerson DP, Pascholati SF, Hagerman AE, Butler LG, Nicholson RL (1984) Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase and hydroxy cinnamate: CoA ligase in maize mesocotyls inoculated with Helminthosporium maydis or Helminthosporium carbonum. Physiol Plant Pathol 25:111–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duffy BK, Weller DM (1995) Use of Gaumannomyces graminis var graminis alone and in combination with fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. to suppress take all of wheat. Plant Dis 79:907–911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Finlay AR, Brown AE (1993) The relative importance of Colletotrichum musae as a crown-rot pathogen on Windward Island bananas. Plant Pathol 42:67–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fukui R, Schroth MN, Hendson M, Hancock JG (1994) Interaction between strains of Pseudomonads in sugar beet sphermospheres and the relationship to pericarp colonization by Pythium ultimum in soil. Phytopathology 84:1322–1330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gomez KA, Gomez AA (1984) Statistical procedure for agricultural research. Wiley, New York, p 680Google Scholar
  15. Gross GG (1980) The biochemistry of lignification. Adv Bot Res 8:25–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guetsky R, Shtienberg D, Elad Y, Dinoor A (2001) Combining biocontrol agents to reduce the variability of biological control. Phytopathology 91:621–627CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hammerschmidt R, Kuc JA (1982) Lignification as a mechanism for induced systemic resistance in cucumber. Physiol Plant Pathol 20:61–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hong CX, Michailides TJ, Holtz BA (1998) Effects of wounding, inoculum density, and biological control agents on postharvest brown rot of stone fruits. Plant Dis 82:210–1216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ingham JL (1972) Phytoalexins and other natural products as factors in plant disease. Bot Rev 38:343–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Janisiewicz WJ, Korsten L (2002) Biological control of post harvest diseases of fruits. Annu Rev Phytopathol 40:411–441CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Janisiewicz W, Yourman L, Roitman J, Mahoney N (1991) Post harvest control of blue mold and gray mold of apples and pears by dip treatment with pyrrolnitrin, a metabolite of Pseudomonas cepacia. Plant Dis 75:490–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Janisiewicz WJ, Peterson DL, Bors R (1994) Control of storage rots of apples with Sporobolomyces roseus. Plant Dis 78:466–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Joseph LM, Tan TK, Wong SM (1998) Antifungal effects of hydrogen peroxide and peroxidase on spore germination and mycelial growth of Pseudocercospora species. Can J Bot 76:2119–2124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Korsten L, De Villiers EE, Wehner FC, Kotze JM (1997) Field sprays of Bacillus subtilis and fungicide for the control of post harvest fruit disease of Avacado in South Africa. Plant Dis 81:455–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Krauss U, Mathews P, Bidwell R, Hocart M, Anthony F (2001) Strain discrimination of fungal antagonists of Colletotrichum musae: Implications for biocontrol of crown rot of banana. Mycol Res 105:67–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kuc J, Rush JS (1985) Phytoalexins. Arch Biochem Biophys 236:455–472CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Leeman M, Van Pelt JA, Hendrickx MJ, Scheffer RJ, Bakker PAHM, Schippers B (1995) Biocontrol of Fusarium wilt of radish in commercial greenhouse trials by seed treatment with Pseudomonas fluorescens WCS374. Phytopathology 85:1301–1305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Leeman M, Den Ouden FM, Van Pelt J, Cornelissen C, Matamala-Garros A, Bakker PAHM, Schippers B (1996) Suppression of Fusarium wilt of radish by co-inoculation of fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. and root colonizing fungi. Eur J Plant Pathol 102:21–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Leibinger W, Beuker B, Hahn M, Mendgen K (1997) Control of post harvest pathogens and colonization of the apple surface by antagonistic microorganisms in the field. Phytopathology 87:1103–1110CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Liu L, Kloepper JW, Tuzun S (1995a) Induction of systemic resistance in cucumber against bacterial angular leaf spot by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Phytopathology 85:843–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liu L, Kloepper JW, Tuzun S (1995b) Induction of systemic resistance in cucumber by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria: duration of protection and effect of host resistance on protection and root colonization. Phytopathology 85:1064–1068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. M’Piga P, Belanger RR, Paulitz TC, Benhamou N (1997) Increased resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radicis lycopersici in tomato plants treated with endophytic bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens strain 63-28. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 50:01–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mari M, Guizzardi M, Pratella GC (1996a) Biological control of grey mold in pears by antagonistic bacteria. Biol Control 7:30–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mari M, Guizzardi M, Brunelli M, Folchi A (1996b) Postharvest biologicalcontrol of grey mould (Botrytis cinerea Pers.: Fr.) on fresh-market tomatoes with Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. Crop Prot 15:99–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Maurhofer M, Hase C, Meuwly P, Metraux JP, Defago G (1994) Induction of systemic resistance of tobacco to tobacco necrosis virus by the root-colonizing Pseudomonas fluorescens strain CHAO: influence of the gacA gene and of pyoverdine production. Phytopathology 84:139–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mayer AM, Harel E, Shaul RB (1965) Assay of catechol oxidase: a critical comparison of methods. Phytochem 5:783–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Meena B, Radhajeyalakshmi R, Marimuthu T, Vidhyasekaran P, Sabitha D, Velazhahan R (1999) Induction of pathogenesis-related proteins, phenolics and phenylalanine ammonia-lyase in groundnut by Pseudomonas fluorescens. J Plant Dis Prot 107:4–527Google Scholar
  38. Morpurgo R, Lopato SV, Afza R, Novak FJ (1994) Selection parameters for resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense race 1 and race 4 on diploid banana (Musa acuminata Colla). Euphytica 75:121–129Google Scholar
  39. Persely (ed) (1993) Diseases of fruit crops. Queensland Government, Department of primary industries, Brisbane, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  40. Pierson EA, Weller DM (1994) Use of mixtures of fluorescent pseudomonads to suppress take all and improve growth in wheat. Phytopathology 84:940–947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ploetz RC, Zentmyer GA, Nisijima WT (1994) Compendium of tropical fruit disease. American Phytopathological Society Press, Oregon, p 134Google Scholar
  42. Pusey PL, Wilson CH (1984) Postharvest biological control of stone fruits brown rot by Bacillus subtilis. Plant Dis 72:753–756Google Scholar
  43. Ramamoorthy V, Raguchander T, Samiyappan R (2002) Induction of defense-related proteins in tomato roots treated with Pseudomonas fluorescens Pf1 and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycoperisci. Plant Soil 239:55–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Reimers PJ, Guo A, Leach JE (1992) In creased activity of cationic peroxidase associated with an in compatible inter action between Xanthomonas oryzae pv oryzae and rice (Oryza sativa). Plant Physiol 99:44–1050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sariah M, Lim CL, Tariq SA (2001) Use of biochemical markers as a measure of resistance towards Fusarium wilt of banana. In: Molina AB, Nik Masdek NH, Liew KW (eds) Banana Fusarium wilt management: towards sustainable cultivation. INIBAP Asia and Pacific Network, Los Baňos, pp 243–249Google Scholar
  46. Schaad NW (1992) Laboratory guide for identification of plant pathogenic bacteria. In: Schaad NW (ed) The American Phytopathological Society. International Book distributing Co., Lucknow, India, pp 60–80Google Scholar
  47. Smilanick JL (1994) Strategies for the isolation and testing of biocontrol agents. In: Wilson CL, Wisniewski ME (eds) Biological control of postharvest diseases. Theory and practice. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp 25–41Google Scholar
  48. Smilanick JL, Dennis-Arrue R (1992) Control of green mold of lemons with Pseudomonas species. Plant Dis 76:481–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Thompson DC (1996) Evaluation of bacterial antagonists for reduction of summer patch symptoms in Kentucky blue grass. Plant Dis 80:856–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Van Peer R, Niemann GJ, Schippers B (1991) Induced resistance and phytoalexin accumulation in biological control of Fusarium wilt of carnation by Pseudomonas sp. strain WCS417r. Phytopathology 81:728–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Velazhahan R, Vidhyasekaran P (1994) Role of pheno lic com pounds, peroxidase and polyphenol-oxidase in resistance of ground nut to rust. Acta Phytopathol Entomol Hung 29:23–29Google Scholar
  52. Viswanathan R, Samiyappan R (1999) Induction of systemic resistance by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria against red rot disease in sugarcane. Sugar Tech 1:67–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ward ER, Uknes SJ, Williams SC, Dincher SS, Widerhold DL, Alexander DC, Ahl-Goy P, Mefraux JP, Ryals JA (1991) Coordinate gene activity in response to agents that induce systemic acquired resistance. Plant Cell 3:1085–1094CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Wei G, Kloepper JW, Tuzun S (1991) Induction of systemic resistance of cucumber to Colletotrichum orbiculare by select strains of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Phytopathology 81:1508–1512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wilson CL, Wisniewski M (1989) Biological control of post harvest diseases of fruits and vegetables: an emerging technology. Annu Rev Phytopathol 27:425–441Google Scholar
  56. Wilson CL, Wisniewski ME, Biles CL, McLaughlin R, Chalutz E, Droby E (1991) Biological control of post-harvest diseases of fruits and vegetables: alternatives to synthetic fungicides. Crop Prot 10:172–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wisniewski ME, Wilson CL (1992) Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables: recent advances. HortScience 27:94–98Google Scholar
  58. Wisniewski M, Wilson C, El-Ghaouth A, Droby S (2001) Non-chemical approaches to postharvest disease control. Acta Hortic 553:407–412Google Scholar
  59. Xue L, Charest PM, Jabaji-Hare SH (1998) Systemic induction of Peroxidases, ß, 1–3, glucanases, chitinases and resistance in bean plants by binucleate Rhizoctonia species. Phytopathology 88:359–365CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Yedidia I, Benhamou N, Chet I (1999) Induction of defense responses in cucumber plants (Cucumis sativus L.) by the bio control agent Trichoderma harzianum. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:1061–1070PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Zahavi T, Cohen L, Weiss B, Schena L, Daus A, Kaplunov T, Zutkhi J, Ben-Arie R, Droby S (2000) Biological control of Botrytis, Aspergillus and Rhizopus rots on table and wine grapes in Israel. Postharvest Biol Technol 20:115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zdor RE, Anderson AJ (1992) Influence of root colonizing bacteria on the defense responses of bean. Plant Soil 140:99–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zieslin N, Ben-Zaken R (1993) Peroxidase activity and presence of phenolic substances in peduncles of rose flowers. Plant Physiol Biochem 31:333–339Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Franciszek Górski Institute of Plant Physiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Sangeetha
    • 1
  • R. Thangavelu
    • 2
  • S. Usha Rani
    • 1
  • A. Muthukumar
    • 1
  • R. Udayakumar
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant Pathology, Faculty of AgricultureAnnamalai UniversityChidambaramIndia
  2. 2.National Research Centre for BananaThiruchirapalliIndia

Personalised recommendations