Advertisement

Acta Physiologiae Plantarum

, Volume 31, Issue 4, pp 705–710 | Cite as

Effects of copy number of an octopine synthase enhancer element and its distance from the TATA box on heterologous expression in transgenic tobacco

  • Shijuan Liu
  • Ying Bao
Original Paper

Abstract

The relationship among motif copy number, its distance from the TATA box and expression level was analyzed in transformed tobacco plants. Single or multiple copies of octopine synthase (ocs) enhancer elements from the ocs promoter were linked to the minimal ocs promoter and a β-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter gene, then transformed stably into tobacco. Reporter gene assays revealed that mere repetition of the ocs enhancer sequence is not sufficient for promoter activity. Increasing the number of copies of the ocs element elevated the level of gene expression in an additive manner that was dependent of the element’s distance from the TATA box. To our knowledge, this is the first report in which the regulation of transgene expression by interactions between these two factors has been documented.

Keywords

Synthetic promoter Motif copy number Distance effect GUS activity 

Abbreviations

GUS

β-Glucuronidase

ocs

Octopine synthase

DR

Directed repeat

IR

Inverted repeat

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Decai Cui for providing the construct 8. This research was supported by grants from the National Special Program for Research and Industrialization of Transgenic Plants (Grant No. J99-A-038) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 30770145).

References

  1. Bhullar S, Chakravarthy S, Advani S et al (2003) Strategies for development of functionally equivalent promoters with minimum sequence homology for transgene expression in plants: cis-elements in a novel DNA context versus domain swapping. Plant Physiol 132:988–998. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.020602 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bouchez D, Tokuhisa JG, Liewellyn DJ et al (1989) The ocs-element is a component of the promoters of several T-DNA and plant viral genes. EMBO J 8(13):4197–4204PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradford MH (1976) Rapid and sensitive methods for quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cazzonelli CI, Velten J (2008) In vivo characterization of plant promoter element interaction using synthetic promoters. Transgenic Res 17:437–457. doi: 10.1007/s11248-007-9117-8 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cazzonelli CI, Burke J, Velten J (2005) Functional characterization of the geminiviral conserved late element (CLE) in uninfected tobacco. Plant Mol Biol 58:465–481. doi: 10.1007/s11103-005-6589-x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chaturvedi CP, Sawant SV, Kiran K et al (2006) Analysis of polarity in the expression from a multifactorial bidirectional promoter designed for high-level expression of transgenes in plants. J Biotechnol 123:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2005.10.014 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ellis JG, Llewellyn DJ, Walker JC et al (1987) The ocs element: a 16 base pair palindrome essential for activity of the octopine synthase enhancer. EMBO J 6:3203–3208PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Fang RX, Nagy F, Sivasubramaniam S et al (1989) Multiple cis regulatory elements for maximal expression of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter in transgenic plants. Plant Cell 1:141–150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Geisler M, Kleczkowski LA, Karpinski S (2006) A universal algorithm for genome-wide in silicio identification of biologically significant gene promoter putative cis-regulatory-elements; identification of new elements for reactive oxygen species and sucrose signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant J 45(3):384–398. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02634.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Horsch RB, Fry JE, Hoffmann NL et al (1985) A simple and general method for transferring genes into plants. Science 227:1229–1231. doi: 10.1126/science.227.4691.1229 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ishige F, Takaichi M, Foster R et al (1999) A G-box motif (GCCACGTGCC) tetramer confers high-level constitutive expression in dicot and monocot plants. Plant J 18(4):443–448. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1999.00456.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jefferson RA (1987) Assaying chimeric genes in plants: the GUS gene fusion system. Plant Mol Biol Rep 5:287–305. doi: 10.1007/BF02667740 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Koncz C, De Greve H, André D et al (1983) The opine synthase genes carried by Ti plasmids contain all signals necessary for expression in plants. EMBO J 2(9):1597–1603PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Leisner SM, Gelvin SB (1988) Structure of the octopine synthase upstream activator sequence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:2553–2557. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.8.2553 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ni M, Cui DC, Einstein J et al (1995) Strength and tissue specificity of chimeric promoters derived from the octopine and mannopine synthase genes. Plant J 7:661–676. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1995.7040661.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rushton P, Reinstadler A, Lipka V et al (2002) Synthetic plant promoters containing defined regulatory elements provide novel insights into pathogen- and wound-induced signaling. Plant Cell 14:749–762. doi: 10.1105/tpc.010412 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sawant SV, Kiran K, Mehrotra R et al (2005) A variety of synergistic and antagonistic interactions mediated by cis-acting DNA motifs regulate gene expression in plant cells and modulate stability of the transcription complex formed on a basal promoter. J Exp Bot 56:2345–2353. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eri227 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Singh KB, Foley RC, Oñate-Sánchez L (2002) Transcription factors in plant defense and stress responses. Curr Opin Plant Biol 5:430–436. doi: 10.1016/S1369-5266(02)00289-3 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Venter M (2007) Synthetic promoters: genetic control through cis engineering. Trends Plant Sci 12:118–124. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2007.01.002 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Xie MT, He YH, Gan SS (2001) Bidirectionalization of polar promoters in plants. Nat Biotechnol 19:677–679. doi: 10.1038/90296 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Franciszek Górski Institute of Plant Physiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Life SciencesQufu Normal UniversityQufuPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations