Advertisement

Côlon & Rectum

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 94–100 | Cite as

ERAS® et la réhabilitation précoce en chirurgie colorectale

  • D. Roulin
  • N. DemartinesEmail author
Dossier Thématique / Thematic File
  • 109 Downloads

Résumé

La réhabilitation précoce en chirurgie, ou Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®), est une prise en charge multidisciplinaire, standardisée, et basée sur la médecine factuelle. L’application de ses principes permet de diminuer significativement les complications postopératoires avec pour conséquence une diminution de la durée d’hospitalisation et des coûts de la santé. L’évolution postopératoire est étroitement liée à l’adhérence aux différents éléments composant un programme de réhabilitation précoce. Ainsi l’emploi d’un outil d’audit prospectif est essentiel afin de garantir une prise en charge optimale des patients.

Mots clés

Réhabilitation précoce ERAS Chirurgie colorectale 

ERAS® and enhanced recovery in colorectal surgery

Abstract

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) is a multimodal, standardized and evidence-based perioperative care pathway.With ERAS®, postoperative complications are significantly lowered, and, as a secondary effect, length of hospital stay and health cost is reduced. Postoperative outcome is related to the compliance to the components of the enhanced recovery programme. Therefore, a prospective audit tool is essential in order to ensure an optimal management of the patient.

Keywords

Enhanced recovery ERAS Colorectal surgery 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. 1.
    Ljungqvist O. (2014) ERAS-Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: Moving Evidence-Based Perioperative Care to Practice. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 38:559–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M, et al (2005) Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr 24:466–77CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lassen K, Soop M, Nygren J, et al (2009) Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group recommendations. Arch Surg 144: 961–9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W, et al (2013) Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations. W J Surg 37: 259–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nygren J, Thacker J, Carli F, et al (2013) Guidelines for perioperative care in elective rectal/pelvic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations. W J Surg 37:285–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sorensen LT, Karlsmark T, Gottrup F (2003) Abstinence from smoking reduces incisional wound infection: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 238:1–5PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lindstrom D, Sadr Azodi O, Wladis A, et al (2008) Effects of a perioperative smoking cessation intervention on postoperative complications: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 248:739–45CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hubner M, Muller S, Schafer M, et al (2010) Impact of the nutritional risk score in fast-track colon surgery. Digest Surg 27:436–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gustafsson UO, Ljungqvist O. (2011) Perioperative nutritional management in digestive tract surgery. Curr Op Clin Nutr Metabol Care 14: 504–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nygren J, Soop M, Thorell A, et al (1998) Preoperative oral carbohydrate administration reduces postoperative insulin resistance. Clin Nutr 17: 65–71CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hausel J, Nygren J, Lagerkranser M, et al (2001) A carbohydraterich drink reduces preoperative discomfort in elective surgery patients. Anesthes Analges 93: 1344–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Smith MD, McCall J, Plank L, et al (2014) Preoperative carbohydrate treatment for enhancing recovery after elective surgery. Cochrane database of systematic reviews 8CD009161Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Guenaga KF, Matos D, Wille-Jorgensen P. (2011) Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. Cochrane database of systematic reviews: CD001544.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bretagnol F, Panis Y, Rullier E, et al (2010) Rectal cancer surgery with or without bowel preparation: The French GRECCAR III multicenter single-blinded randomized trial. Ann Surg 252:863–8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW, et al (2011) Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg 254: 868–75CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kennedy RH, Francis EA, Wharton R, et al (2014) Multicenter randomized controlled trial of conventional versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme: EnROL. J Clin Oncol: Official J Am Soc Clin Oncol 32:1804–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Petrowsky H, Demartines N, Rousson V, Clavien PA. (2004) Evidence-based value of prophylactic drainage in gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Ann Surg 240:1074–84 discussion 84-5CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nelson R, Edwards S, Tse B. (2005) Prophylactic nasogastric decompression after abdominal surgery. Cochrane database of systematic reviews: CD004929Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zmora O, Madbouly K, Tulchinsky H, et al (2010) Urinary bladder catheter drainage following pelvic surgery—is it necessary for that long? Dis Colon Rectum 53: 321–6CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zaouter C, Kaneva P, Carli F. (2009) Less urinary tract infection by earlier removal of bladder catheter in surgical patients receiving thoracic epidural analgesia. Region Anesthes Pain Med 34:542–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hubner M, Blanc C, Roulin D, et al (2014) Randomized Clinical Trial on Epidural Versus Patient-Controlled Analgesia for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Within an Enhanced Recovery Pathway. Ann Surg 261:648–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Joshi GP, Bonnet F, Kehlet H (2013) Evidence-based postoperative pain management after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Colorect Dis: Offic J Assoc Coloproctol Great Britain and Ireland 15:146–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Brandstrup B, Tonnesen H, Beier-Holgersen R, et al (2003) Effects of intravenous fluid restriction on postoperative complications: comparison of two perioperative fluid regimens: a randomized assessor-blinded multicenter trial. Ann Surg 238: 641–8CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hubner M, Schafer M, Demartines N, et al (2012) Impact of restrictive intravenous fluid replacement and combined epidural analgesia on perioperative volume balance and renal function within a Fast Track program. J Surg Res 173: 68–74CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Varadhan KK, Lobo DN. (2010) A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of intravenous fluid therapy in major elective open abdominal surgery: getting the balance right. Proceed Nutr Soc 69: 488–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Srinivasa S, Lemanu DP, Singh PP, et al (2013) Systematic review and meta-analysis of oesophageal Doppler-guided fluid management in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 100: 1701–8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Phan TD, D’Souza B, Rattray MJ, et al (2014) A randomised controlled trial of fluid restriction compared to oesophageal Doppler-guided goal-directed fluid therapy in elective major colorectal surgery within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program. Anaesthes Intens Care 42: 752–60Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhuang CL, Ye XZ, Zhang CJ, et al (2013) Early versus traditional postoperative oral feeding in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Digest Surg 30: 225–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    van den Heijkant TC, Costes LM, van der Lee DG, et al (2015) Randomized clinical trial of the effect of gum chewing on postoperative ileus and inflammation in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 102: 202–11CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Group EC. (2015) The Impact of Enhanced Recovery Protocol Compliance on Elective Colorectal Cancer Resection: Results From an International Registry. Ann Surg (Epub ahead of print)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Arsalani-Zadeh R, Ullah S, Khan S, Macfie J. (2010) Current pattern of perioperative practice in elective colorectal surgery; a questionnaire survey of ACPGBI members. Internat J Surg 8:294–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hasenberg T, Keese M, Langle F, et al (2009) ’Fast-track’ colonic surgery in Austria and Germany—results from the survey on patterns in current perioperative practice. Colorect dis: offic J Assoc Coloproctol Great Britain and Ireland 11:162–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gillissen F, Ament SM, Maessen JM, et al (2015) Sustainability of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program (ERAS) in Colonic Surgery. W J Surg 39: 526–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Greco M, Capretti G, Beretta L, et al (2014) Enhanced recovery program in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. W J Surg 38: 1531–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Roulin D, Donadini A, Gander S, et al (2013) Cost-effectiveness of the implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol for colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 100: 1108–14CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lee L, Mata J, Ghitulescu GA, et al (2014) Cost-effectiveness of Enhanced Recovery Versus Conventional Perioperative Management for Colorectal Surgery. Ann Surg (Epub ahead of print)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Jakobsen DH, Sonne E, Andreasen J, Kehlet H. (2006) Convalescence after colonic surgery with fast-track vs conventional care. Colorect dis: offic J Assoc Coloproctol of Great Britain and Ireland 8: 683–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bagnall NM, Malietzis G, Kennedy RH, et al (2014) A systematic review of enhanced recovery care after colorectal surgery in elderly patients. Colorect dis: offic J Assoc Coloproctol of Great Britain and Ireland 16: 947–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Roulin D, Blanc C, Muradbegovic M, et al (2014) Enhanced Recovery Pathway for Urgent Colectomy. W J Surg 38:2153–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lohsiriwat V. (2014) Enhanced recovery after surgery vs conventional care in emergency colorectal surgery. WJG 20: 13950–5CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Service de Chirurgie ViscéraleCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV)LausanneSuisse

Personalised recommendations