Douleur et Analgésie

, 24:29 | Cite as

Séquelles incapacitantes après chimio- et radiothérapie

Article / Article

Résumé

Le nombre de survivants à un cancer ne cesse d’augmenter. La chimiothérapie et la radiothérapie restent les bases incontournables du traitement, lorsque les chances de guérison par la chirurgie seule sont jugées insuffisantes. Mis à part la toxicité aiguë engendrée par ces deux modalités, de nombreux effets secondaires à long terme ont été identifiés, dont certains sont incapacitants. L’expérience accumulée avec le temps, l’avènement de nouveaux traitements plus spécifiques et de techniques d’irradiation plus précises, les programmes de détection précoce de certaines tumeurs suggèrent cependant que les effets secondaires sévères, du moins physiques, sont appelés à décroître. Le spectre des séquelles invalidantes tend donc à se déplacer vers des troubles moins aisément quantifiables, pourtant bien réels, que sont une fatigue persistante, invalidante, un état dépressif, des troubles cognitifs avec diminution des performances. La crainte d’une récidive et les risques d’un deuxième cancer s’ajoutent à ce tableau. Un environnement psychosocial aidant, une reconnaissance empathique de la réalité de ces troubles, associés à d’autres mesures de soutien sont des facteurs importants pour en diminuer les conséquences.

Mots clés

Cancer Chimiothérapie Radiothérapie Survie à long terme Séquelles invalidantes 

Incapacitating late effects after chemo- and radiotherapy

Abstract

An increasing number of patients with cancer become long-term survivors. Currently, chemotherapy and radiotherapy remain the mainstay of cancer treatment when surgery alone is considered insufficient. Both approaches, whether used alone or in combination, produce transient acute toxicities but may also result in long-term incapacitating late effects. Regarding exclusively late physical disabilities, accumulated experience, early detection programs, the advent of newer, more specific and tumor-targeted agents as well as sophisticated irradiation techniques suggest that the incidence of such late effects will decrease. In contrast, chronic incapacitating fatigue, cognitive impairment and psychosocial distress are likely to become critical issues and are more difficult to assess. Fear of relapse and risk of second malignancy all add to this sometimes distressing situation. A supportive psychosocial environment, empathic acknowledgement of a genuine suffering and other therapeutic approaches are important goals towards rehabilitation.

Keywords

Cancer Chemotherapy Radiotherapy Longterm survival Late effects 

Références

  1. 1.
    Altena R, Perik PJ, van Veldhuisen DJ, et al (2009) Cardiovascular toxicity caused by cancer treatment: strategies for early detection. Lancet Oncol 10:391–399PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bieri S, Roosnek E, Helg C, et al (2008) Quality of life and social integration after allogeneic hematopoietic SCT. Bone Marrow Transplant 42(12):819–827PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carver JR, Shapiro CL, Ng A, et al (2007) ASCO Cancer Survivorship Expert Panel. American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical evidence review on the ongoing care of adult cancer survivors: cardiac and pulmonary late effects. J Clin Oncol 25:3991–4008PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cella D, Lai J, Chang C, et al (2002) Fatigue in cancer patients compared with fatigue in the general United States population. Cancer 94:528–538PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    De Bruin ML, Sparidans J, van’t Veer MB, et al (2009) Breast cancer risk in female survivors of Hodgkin’s lymphoma: lower risk after smaller radiation volumes. J Clin Oncol 26:4239–4246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dietrich J, Wen PY (2006) Neurologic complications of chemotherapy. In: Schiff D, Kesari S, Wen PY (eds) Cancer neurology in clinical practice. 2nd ed. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, pp 287–326Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gianni L, Herman EH, Lipshultz SE, et al (2008) Anthracycline cardiotoxicity: from bench to bedside. J Clin Oncol 26:3777–3784PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E (2006) From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. The National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jeruss JS, Woodruff TK (2009) Preservation of fertility in patients with cancer. N Engl J Med 360:902–911PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kangas M, Bovbjerg DH, Mongomery GH (2008) Cancer-related fatigue: a systematic and meta-analytic review of non-pharmacological therapies for cancer patients. Psych Bull 134:700–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee SJ, Schover LR, Partridge AH, et al (2006) American society of clinical oncology recommendations on fertility preservation in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 24:2917–2931PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miller AH, Ancoli-Israel S, Bower JE, et al (2008) Neuroendocrine-immune mechanisms of behavioral comorbidities in patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:971–982PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    National Cancer Institute, Cancer Survivorship Research — Estimated US cancer prevalence counts: who are our cancer survivors in the U.S. ? http://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/ocs/prevalence/index.html
  14. 14.
    National Comprehensive Cancer Network — NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: cancer-related fatigue V (2010) Retrieved from http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/fatigue.pdf
  15. 15.
    Simon A (2003) Cancer et fatigue. Med Pal 2:14–22Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Strasser F, Palmer JL, Schover LR, et al (2006) The impact of hypogonadism and autonomic dysfunction on fatigue, emotional function, and sexual desire in male patients with advanced cancer: a pilot study. Cancer 107:2949–2957PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tonezzer T, Pereira CM, Filho UP, Marx A (2010) Hormone therapy/adjuvant chemotherapy induced deleterious effects on the bone mass of breast cancer patients and intervention of physiotherapy: a literature review. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 31:262–267PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wallace WHB, Anderson RA, Irvine DS (2005) Fertility preservation for young patients with cancer: who is at risk and what can be offered? Lancet Oncol 6:209–218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Médecine et Hygiène et Springer-Verlag France 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Helg
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Service d’Oncologie-HématologieCentre de Radio-Oncologie des Eaux-VivesGenèveSuisse
  2. 2.Clinique de GenolierGenèveSuisse

Personalised recommendations