Skip to main content
Log in

Moving targets: collective decisions and flexible choices in house-hunting ants

  • Published:
Swarm Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many decisions involve a trade-off between commitment and flexibility. We show here that the collective decisions ants make over new nest sites are sometimes sufficiently flexible that the ants can change targets even after an emigration has begun. Our findings suggest that, in this context, the ants’ procedures are such that they can sometimes avoid ‘negative information cascades’ which might lock them into a poor choice. The ants are more responsive to belated good news of a higher quality nest than they are when the nest they had initially chosen degraded to become worse than an alternative. Our study confirms, in a new way, that ant colonies can be very powerful “search engines”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beckers, R., Deneubourg, J. L., Goss, S., & Pasteels, J. M. (1990). Collective decision making through food recruitment. Insectes Sociaux, 37, 258–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckers, R., Deneubourg, J. L., & Goss, S. (1992). Trail laying behavior during food recruitment in the ant Lasius niger (L.). Insectes Sociaux, 39, 59–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamini, Y., & Yekutieli, D. (2001). The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Annals of Statistics, 29, 1165–1188.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, S., Halász, Á., Kumar, V., & Pratt, S. (2006). Algorithms for the analysis and synthesis of a bio-inspired swarm robotic system. In Lecture notes in computer science : Vol. 4433. Proceedings of the 2nd SAB 2006 international workshop on swarm robotics (pp. 56–70). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, S., Halász, Á., Kumar, V., & Pratt, S. (2007). Bio-inspired group behaviors for the deployment of a swarm of robots to multiple destinations. In Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (pp. 2318–2323). Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bonabeau, E., Dorigo, M., & Theraulaz, G. (1999). Swarm intelligence: from natural to artificial systems (p. XII+307). New York: Oxford University Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bourke, A. F. G., & Franks, N. R. (1995). Social evolution in ants. Monographs in behavioral ecology (p. XIV+529). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton, N. F., Franks, N. R., Pratt, S. C., & Seeley, T. D. (2002). Deciding on a new home: how do honeybees agree? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, 269, 1383–1388. doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camazine, S., Deneubourg, J.-L., Franks, N. R., Sneyd, J., Theraulaz, G., & Bonabeau, E. (2001). Self-organization in biological systems. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chittka, L., Dyer, A. G., Bock, F., & Dornhaus, A. (2003). Bees trade off foraging speed for accuracy. Nature, 424, 388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cicirello, V., Peysakhov, M., Anderson, G., Naik, G., Tsang, K., Regli, W., & Kam, M. (2005). Designing dependable agent systems for mobile wireless networks. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 19, 39–45. doi:10.1109/MIS.2004.41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conradt, L., & Roper, T. J. (2005). Consensus decision making in animals. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20, 449–456. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couzin, I. D., Krause, J., Franks, N. R., & Levin, S. A. (2005). Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move. Nature, 433, 513–516. doi:10.1038/nature03236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, T. L., & Boddy, M. (1988). An analysis of time-dependent planning. In T. M. Mitchell & G. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of the seventh national conference on artificial intelligence (pp. 49–54). Menlo Park: AAAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dechaume-Moncharmont, F.-X., Dornhaus, A., Houston, A. I., McNamara, J. M., Collins, E. J., & Franks, N. R. (2005). The hidden cost of information in collective foraging. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 272, 1689–1695. doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dornhaus, A., Franks, N. R., Hawkins, R. M., & Shere, H. N. S. (2004). Ants move to improve—colonies of Leptothorax albipennis emigrate whenever they find a superior nest site. Animal Behaviour, 67, 959–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dornhaus, A., & Franks, N. R. (2006). Colony size affects collective decision-making in the ant Temnothorax albipennis. Insectes Sociaux, 53, 420–427. doi:10.1007/s0040-006-0887-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dornhaus, A., Collins, E. J., Dechaume-Moncharmont, F.-X., Houston, A. I., Franks, N. R., & McNamara, J. M. (2006). Paying for information: partial loads in central place foragers. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 61, 151–161. doi:10.1007/s00265-006-0246-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franks, N. R. (1989). Army ants: a collective intelligence. American Scientist, 77, 138–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks, N. R., & Richardson, T. (2006). Teaching in tandem-running ants. Nature, 439, 153. doi:10.1038/439153a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franks, N. R., Pratt, S. C., Mallon, E. B., Britton, N. F., & Sumpter, D. J. T. (2002). Information flow, opinion-polling and collective intelligence in house-hunting social insects. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, 357, 1567–1583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franks, N. R., Dornhaus, A., Fitzsimmons, J. P., & Stevens, M. (2003a). Speed versus accuracy in collective decision-making. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, 270, 2457–2463. doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franks, N. R., Mallon, E. B., Bray, H. E., Hamilton, M. J., & Mischler, T. C. (2003b). Strategies for choosing among alternatives with different attributes: exemplified by house-hunting ants. Animal Behaviour, 65, 215–223. doi:10.1006/anbe.2002.2032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franks, N. R., Dornhaus, A., Best, C. S., & Jones, E. L. (2006a). Decision-making by small & large house hunting ant colonies: one size fits all. Animal Behaviour, 72, 611–616. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.11.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franks, N. R., Dornhaus, A., Metherell, B. G., Nelson, T. R., Lanfear, S. A. J., & Symes, W. S. (2006b). Not everything that counts can be counted: Ants use multiple metrics for a single nest trait. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, 273, 165–169. doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franks, N. R., Hooper, J. W., Dornhaus, A., Aukett, P. J., Hayward, A. L., & Berghoff, S. M. (2007). Reconnaissance and latent learning in ants. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, 274, 1505–1509. doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.0138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giraldeau, L.-A., Valone, T. J., & Templeton, J. J. (2002). Potential disadvantages of using socially acquired information. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, 357, 1559–1566. doi:10.1098/rstb.2002.1065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janson, S., Middendorf, M., & Beekman, M. (2007). Searching for a new home—scouting behavior of honeybee swarms. Behavioral Ecology, 18, 384–392. doi:10.1093/beheco/arl095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, A. J., & Cowlishaw, G. (2007). When to use social information: the advantage of large group size in individual decision making. Biology Letters, 3, 137–139. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2007.0017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallon, E. B., Pratt, S. C., & Franks, N. R. (2001). Individual and collective decision-making during nest site selection by the ant Leptothorax albipennis. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 50, 352–359. doi:10.1007/s002650100377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, J. A. R., Dornhaus, A., Franks, N. R., & Kovacs, T. (2006). Noise, cost and speed-accuracy trade-offs: decision-making in a decentralized system. Journal of the Royal Society: Interface, 3, 243–254. doi:10.1098/rsif.2005.0075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, B., Raybould, A. F., & Clarke, R. T. (1995). Breeding behavior, relatedness and sex- investment ratios in Leptothorax tuberum Fabricius. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 75, 165–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peysakhov, M. D., & Regli, W. C. (2005). Ant inspired server population management in a service based computing environment. In Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE swarm intelligence symposium (pp. 357–364). Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society Press. doi:10.1109/SIS. 2005.1501643.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Peysakhov, M., Dugan, C., Modi, P. J., & Regli, W. (2006). Quorum sensing on mobile ad-hoc networks. In Proceedings of the 5th international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (pp. 1104–1106). New York: ACM. doi:10.1145/1160633.1160831.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Planqué, R., Dornhaus, A., Franks, N. R., Kovacs, T., & Marshall, J. A. R. (2006). Weighting waiting in collective decision-making. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 61, 347–356. doi:10.1007/s00265-006-0263-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, S. C., & Sumpter, D. J. T. (2006). A tunable algorithm for collective decision-making. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 15906–15910. doi:10.1073/pnas.0604801103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, S. C., Mallon, E. B., Sumpter, D. J. T., & Franks, N. R. (2002). Quorum sensing, recruitment, and collective decision-making during colony emigration by the ant Leptothorax albipennis. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 52, 117–127. doi:10.1007/s00265-002-0487-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, S. C., Sumpter, D. J. T., Mallon, E. B., & Franks, N. R. (2005). An agent-based model of collective nest choice by the ant Temnothorax albipennis. Animal Behaviour, 70, 1023–1036. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.01.022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeley, T. D. (1995). The wisdom of the hive. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeley, T. D., & Buhrman, S. (1999). Group decision making in swarms of honey bees. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 45, 19–31. doi:10.1007/s002650050536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visscher, P. K. (2007). Group decision making in nest-site selection among social insects. Annual Review of Entomology, 52, 255–275. doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.151025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nigel R. Franks.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Franks, N.R., Hooper, J.W., Gumn, M. et al. Moving targets: collective decisions and flexible choices in house-hunting ants. Swarm Intell 1, 81–94 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11721-007-0007-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11721-007-0007-8

Keywords

Navigation