Advertisement

Dao

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 41–58 | Cite as

Happiness and the Good Life: A Classical Confucian Perspective

  • Shirong LuoEmail author
Article
  • 18 Downloads

Abstract

This essay examines the classical (or early) Confucian perspective on the topic of happiness through the lens of three Western theories: hedonism, desire satisfaction theory, and objective list theory. My analysis of the two classical texts—the Analects (Lunyu 論語) and the Mencius (Mengzi 孟子)—reveals that three salient aspects of the Confucian conception of happiness, namely ethical pleasure, ethical desire, and moral innocence, play the fundamental role in the guidance and evaluation of an individual’s life. According to Confucius (Kongzi 孔子, 551–479 BCE) and Mencius (Mengzi 孟子, 371–289 BCE?), happiness consists primarily not in pleasure, but in ethical pleasure; the good life is not a life in which all or most of one’s desires are fulfilled, but a life in which the satisfaction of prudential desires is subject to the constraint of ethical desire; the source of the greatest happiness lies not in the attainment of the greatest political power, but rather in the cognizance of one’s moral innocence. For classical Confucian thinkers, the relationship between happiness and the good life is that happiness is a critically important constituent of the good life. However, happiness—defined in terms of pleasure, desire satisfaction, or a list of goods—needs to be tempered by moral constraints. In light of their views on happiness and the good life, I conclude that Confucius and Mencius each lived a good life that exemplified the three salient features of happiness, and to that extent they were happy.

Keywords

Confucius Mencius Happiness Ethical pleasure Ethical desire Moral innocence 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to express my deep gratitude to two anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments on an early version of this article. My thanks also go to Philip. J. Ivanhoe and Justin Tiwald for their comments at the APA Meeting where I presented a short version of the paper. I am also indebted to Diane Grossman and Sheldon George, who kindly offered to read a draft. All their invaluable comments helped me improve the quality of this article.

References

  1. Ames, Roger T., and Henry Rosemont Jr., trans. 1998. The Analects of Confucius: A Philosophical Translation. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  2. Aristotle. 1999. Nicomachean Ethics. Trans. by Terence Irwin. 2nd ed. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  3. Feldman, Fred. 2004. Pleasure and the Good Life: Concerning the Nature, Varieties, and Plausibility of Hedonism. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fung, Yu-lan. 1952. A History of Chinese Philosophy. Trans. by Derk Bodde. Vol. 1. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Griffin, James. 1986. Well-being: Its Meaning, Measurement and Moral Importance. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Haybron, Daniel M. 2005. “On Being Happy or Unhappy.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71.2: 289–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Heathwood, Chris. 2006. “Desire Satisfactionism and Hedonism.” Philosophical Studies 128: 539–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hurka, Thomas. 2011. The Best Things in Life: A Guide to What Really Matters. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Ivanhoe, Philip. 2013. “Happiness in Early Chinese Thought.” In The Oxford Handbook of Happiness, edited by Susan A. David, Ilona Boniwell, and Amanda Conley Ayers. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Kant, Immanuel. 1997. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Trans. by Mary Gregor. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Lau, D. C., trans. 1970. Mencius. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  12. ______. 1979. The Analects. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  13. Legge, James, trans. 1885. “Li Yun.” In Sacred Books of the East, vol. 28, part 4: The Li Ki. Reprinted in: Sturgeon, Donald. 2006. Chinese Text Project. http://ctext.org/liji/li-yun (last accessed July 6, 2017).
  14. ______. 1970. The Works of Mencius. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Mill, John Stuart. 1998. Utilitarianism. Edited by Roger Crisp. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Nietzsche, Friedrich. 2005. The Anti-Christ, Ecce Homo, Twilight of the Idols, and Other Writings. Trans. by Aaron Ridley and Judith Norman. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Parfit, Derek. 1984. Reasons and Persons. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Ross, William David. 1930. The Right and the Good. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Russell, Bertrand. 1950. “What Desires Are Politically Important?” Nobel Lecture. http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/literature/laureates/1950/russell-lecture.html (last accessed June 28, 2017).
  20. Slingerland, Edward, trans. 2003. Analects with Selections from Traditional Commentaries. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  21. Sumner, Leonard Wayne. 1996. Welfare, Happiness, and Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Tan, Sor-hoon. 2014. “Materialistic Desires and Ethical Life.” In Moral Cultivation and Confucian Character: Engaging Joel J. Kupperman, edited by Li Chenyang and Ni Peimin. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  23. Yang, Bojun 楊伯峻. 2006. Translation and Annotations of the Analects 論語譯注. Beijing 北京: Zhonghua Shuju 中華書局.Google Scholar
  24. Watson, Burton, trans. 2007. The Analects of Confucius. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy DepartmentSimmons UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations