Dao

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 163–185 | Cite as

Mencius and Dewey on Moral Perception, Deliberation, and Imagination

Article

Abstract

I argue against interpretations of Mencius by Liu Xiusheng and Eric Hutton that attempt to make sense of a Mencian account of moral judgment and deliberation in light of the moral particularism of John McDowell. These interpretations read Mencius’s account as relying on a faculty of moral perception, which generates moral judgments by directly perceiving moral facts that are immediately intuited with the help of rudimentary and innate moral inclinations. However, I argue that it is a mistake to identify innate moral inclinations as the foundational source of moral judgments and knowledge. Instead, if we understand that for Mencius an individual’s natural dispositions (xing 性) have a relational element, then the normativity of moral judgments can be seen as stemming from the relationships that constitute the dispositions of each individual. Finally, this essay elaborates on John Dewey's account of moral deliberation as moral imagination, an account which also takes the relational quality of natural dispositions as its starting point, in order to suggest the vital role of imagination for Mencius’s own account of moral deliberation.

Keywords

Moral judgment and motivation Quan 權 Analogical extension Xing 性 Relationality 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Behuniak, James. 2004. Mencius on Becoming Human. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bloom, Irene. 2002. “Biology and Culture in the Mencian View of Human Nature.” In Mencius: Contexts and Interpretations. Edited by Alan K. L. Chan. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
  3. Dewey, John. 1922. Human Nature and Conduct. New York: The Modern Library.Google Scholar
  4. _____. 1960. Theory of the Moral Life. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  5. Hutton, Eric L. 2002. “Moral Connoisseurship in Mengzi.” In Essays on the Moral Philosophy of Mengzi. Edited by Xiusheng Liu and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
  6. Ivanhoe, Philip J. 2002. Ethics in the Confucian Tradition: The Thought of Mengzi and wang Yangming. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Kim, Myeong-seok. 2010. “What Cèyǐn zhī xīn (Compassion/Familial Affection) Really Is.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 9.4: 407-425.Google Scholar
  8. Lau, D.C. 1970. Mencius. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  9. Liu, Xiusheng. 2002. “Mengzian Internalism.” In Essays on the Moral Philosophy of Mengzi. Edited by Xiusheng Liu and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
  10. McDowell, John. 1998. Mind, Value, and Reality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Nuyen, A.T. 2009. “Moral Obligation and Moral Motivation in Confucian Role-Based Ethics.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 8.1: 1-11.Google Scholar
  12. Robins, Dan. 2001. “The Debate Over Human Nature in Warring States China.” Ph.D. Diss., University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  13. _____. 2011. “The Warring States Concept of Xing.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 10.1: 31-51.Google Scholar
  14. Van Norden, Bryan. 2007. Virtue Ethics and Consequentialism in Early Chinese Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Wallace, R. Jay. 1991. “Virtue, Reason, and Principle.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 21.4: 469-95Google Scholar
  16. Welchman, Jennifer. 2010. “Dewey’s Moral Philosophy.” In The Cambridge Companion to Dewey. Edited by Molly Cochran. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Wong, David B. 2002. “Reasons and Analogical Reasoning in Mengzi.” In Essays on the Moral Philosophy of Mengzi. Edited by Xiusheng Liu and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
  18. _____.2004. “Relational and Autonomous Selves.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 31.4: 419-432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy DepartmentUniversity of Hawai’i at ManoaHonoluluUSA

Personalised recommendations