, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 527–530 | Cite as

A Note on the Xunzi’s Explanation of Xing

  • Eric L. Hutton


Human nature Xunzi 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



I would like to thank An Jimin 安继民, P.J. Ivanhoe, Aaron Stalnaker, Justin Tiwald, Stephen Walker, and Wang Ling-kang 王靈康 for discussion of the issues covered in this essay.


  1. An, Jimin 安继民. 2006. Xunzi 荀子. Zhengzhou 郑州: Zhongzhou Guji Chubanshe 中州古籍出版社.Google Scholar
  2. Graham, A. C. 1990. “The Background of the Mencian Theory of Human Nature.” In Studies in Chinese Philosophy and Philosophical Literature. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  3. Lau, D.C., and Chen, F.C., eds. 1996. A Concordance to the Xunzi 荀子逐字索引. Hong Kong: The Commercial Press 商務印書館. References to the text of the Xunzi are according to the numbering system of the concordance (chapter/page/line).Google Scholar
  4. Liang, Tao 梁涛. 2007. “The Tradition of ‘Using Sheng to Discuss Xing’ and the Mencian Theory that Human Nature is Good「以生言性」的传统与孟子性善论.” Zhexue Yanjiu 哲学研究 7: 36–42.Google Scholar
  5. Liao, Jilang 廖吉郎. 2002. A New Edition of the Xunzi 新編荀子. Taibei 台北: Guoli Bianyiguan 國立編譯館.Google Scholar
  6. Liao, Mingchun 廖明春. 1994. A New Exploration of Xunzi 荀子新探. Taibei 台北: Wenjin Chubanshe 文津出版社.Google Scholar
  7. Munro, Donald J. 2001. The Concept of Man in Early China. Reprint edition. Michigan Classics in Chinese Studies 6. Ann Arbor: The Center for Chinese Studies (University of Michigan).Google Scholar
  8. Robins, Dan. 2001. The Debate over Human Nature in Warring States China. PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
  9. _____. 2001–02. “The Development of Xunzi’s Theory of Xing, Reconstructed on the Basis of a Textual Analysis of Xunzi 23, ‘Xing E’ 性惡 (Xing is Bad).” Early China 26–27: 99–158.Google Scholar
  10. _____. 2011. “The Warring States Concept of Xing.” Dao 10(1): 31–51.Google Scholar
  11. Tang, Siu-Fu 鄧小虎. 2008. “The Multi-layered Structure of the Concepts of Nature (Xing) and Artifice (Wei) in the Xunzi 《荀子》中「性」與「偽」的多重結構.” NTU Philosophical Review 國立臺灣大學哲學論評 36: 1–28.Google Scholar
  12. Zhang, Jue 张觉. 1995. An Annotated Translation of the Xunzi 荀子译注. Shanghai 上海: Shanghai Guji Chubanshe 上海古籍出版社.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy DepartmentUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations