Dao

, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 375–390 | Cite as

What to Do in an Unjust State?: On Confucius’s and Socrates’s Views on Political Duty

Article

Abstract

Confucius argued for the centrality of the superior man’s political duty to his fellow human beings and to the state, while Socrates suggested that the superior man (the philosopher) may have no such political duty. However, Confucius also suggested that one not enter or stay—let alone save—a troubled state, while Socrates stayed in an unjust state, apparently fulfilling his political duty to the state by accepting an unjust verdict. In this essay, I will try to show how Confucius could solve these apparent contradictions. I will then examine the reasons Socrates directly and indirectly offers to resolve his seemingly conflicting positions in light of the discussion of the Confucian case. This article is a first step toward a deeper understanding of both Confucius and Socrates (Plato) by way of comparative studies, and of the general issue of a superior man’s political duty to a bad state.

Keyword

Confucius Socrates Plato Political duty 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ames, Roger T. and David L. Hall. 2001. Focusing the Familiar: A Philosophical Interpretation of the Zhongyong. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ames, Roger T. and Henry Rosemont, Jr. 1998. The Analects of Confucius. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  3. Bai, Tongdong. 2008. “A Mencian Version of Limited Democracy.” Res Publica 14 (1): 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. _____. 2009. “The Private and the Public in the Republic and in the Analects” (manuscript).Google Scholar
  5. Barnes, J. 1984. Complete Works of Aristotle, volume 2. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Chan, Wing-Tsit. 1969. A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cheng, Shude 程树德. 1990. Collected Commentaries of the Analects 論語集解. Beijing 北京: Zhonghua Shuju 中華書局.Google Scholar
  8. Düring, Ingemar. 1957. Aristotle in the Ancient Biographical Tradition. Göteborg: Almgvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
  9. Graham, A. C. 2001. Chuang-Tsǔ: The Inner Chapters. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  10. Lau, D. C., trans. 2003. Mencius. Revised and bilingual edition. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Liu, Baonan 劉寶楠. 1986. The Corrected Meaning of the Analects 論語正義. Shanghai 上海: Shanghai Shudian 上海書店.Google Scholar
  12. Palmer, Martin. 1996. The Book of Chuantzu. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  13. Plato. 1984a. Plato’s Theaetetus. Trans. by Seth Benardete. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. _____. 1984b. Apology. In Four Texts on Socrates. Ed. by Thomas G. West and Grace Starry West. Ithaca. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  15. _____. 1984c. Crito. In Four Texts on Socrates. Ed. by Thomas G. West and Grace Starry West. Ithaca. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  16. _____. 1991. The Republic of Plato. Trans. by Allan Bloom. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  17. _____. 1997. Phaedo. Trans. by G. M. A. Grube. In Plato: Complete Works. Ed. By John Cooper. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  18. Qian, Mu 錢穆. 2002. A Biography of Confucius 孔子傳. Beijing 北京: Sanlian Shudian 三聯書店.Google Scholar
  19. Sima, Qian 司馬遷. 1986. Record of History 史記. Shanghai 上海: Shanghai Guji Chubanshe 上海古籍出版社.Google Scholar
  20. Strauss, Leo. 1983. Studies in Platonic Political Philosophy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  21. Tiwald, Justin. 2008. “A Right of Rebellion in the Mengzi?” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 3: 269–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wang, Su 王肅. 1990. Sayings of the Confucian School 孔子家語. Shanghai 上海: Shanghai Guji Press 上海古籍出版社.Google Scholar
  23. West, Thomas G. and Grace Starry West. 1984. Four Texts on Socrates. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Yang, Bojun 楊伯峻. 1980. Translation and Commentary of the Analects 論語譯注. Second edition. Beijing 北京: Zhonghua Shuju 中華書局.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PhilosophyFudan UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations