A New Framework for Comparative Study of Philosophy
- 113 Downloads
The aim of this essay is to outline a conceptual framework for a type of philosophy (or approach to philosophy) to be herein called “non-sentential philosophy.” Although I will primarily concern myself with the conceptual coherence of the framework in this essay, illustrations will be provided to show that the notion has rich implications for comparative studies. In particular, I believe this theoretical framework will be of interest to those looking for a way to capture the differences between certain non-Western philosophical traditions—such as Chinese philosophy—and Western philosophy, a tradition in which the sentential approach is dominant.
KeywordsSententially-structured entity Sentential predicates Sentential philosophy Non-sentential philosophy Chinese philosophy
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- _____. 2000. “Universals as Attributes.” In Metaphysics: An Anthology. Ed. by Jaegwon Kim and Ernest Sosa. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
- Bennett, Jonathan. 1988. Events and Their Names. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
- Block, Ned. 1990. “Mental Images and Cognitive Science.” In Mind and Cognition. Ed. by William Lycan. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
- Fingarette, Herbert. 1998. Confucius: The Secular as Sacred. Illinois: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
- Quine, W. V 1960. Word and Object. New York: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Quine, W. V. 1969. “Ontological Relativity.” In Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Stalnaker, Robert. 1984. Enquiry. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Velleman, David. 2008. “The Way of the Wanton.” In Practical Identity and Narrative Agency. Ed. by Kim Atkins and Catriona MacKenzie. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar