Dao

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 323–337

Governing Through the Dao: A Non-Anarchistic Interpretation of the Laozi

Article

Abstract

Within the literature, Daoist political philosophy has often been linked with anarchism. While some extended arguments have been offered in favor of this conclusion, I take this position to be tenuous and predicated on an assumption that coercive authority cannot be applied through wuwei. Focusing on the Laozi as the fundamental political text of classical Daoism, I lay out a general account of why one ought to be skeptical of classifying it as anarchistic. Keeping this skepticism in mind and recognizing the importance of wuwei in arguments for the anarchist conclusion, I provide a non-anarchistic interpretation of wuwei as a political technique that is consistent with the text of the Laozi. Having presented a plausible alternative to the anarchist understanding of wuwei, I close my discussion with a brief sketch of a positive account of the political theory of the Laozi.

Keywords

Classical Daoism Laozi Political philosophy wuwei Anarchism 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ames, Roger T. 1983. “Is Political Taoism Anarchism?” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 10.1: 27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. _____. 1994. The Art of Rulership: A Study of Ancient Chinese Political Thought. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  3. _____. 1998. “Introduction.” In Wandering at Ease in the Zhuangzi. Edited by Roger T. Ames. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  4. Ames, Roger T., and David Hall, trans. 2003. Daodejing – “Making this Life Significant”: A Philosophical Translation. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  5. Bender, Fredric. 1983. “Taoism and Western Anarchism.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 10.1: 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheng, Chung-Ying. 1983. “Introduction.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 10.1: 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark, John, P. 1978. “What is Anarchism?” In Pennock and Chapman 1978.Google Scholar
  8. _____. 1983. “On Taoism and Politics.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 10.1: 65–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clarke, John J. 1999. “Taoist Politics: An Other Way?” In Border Crossings: Towards a Comparative Political Theory. Edited by Fred Dallmayr, 253–276. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  10. _____. 2000. The Tao of the West: Western Transformations of Taoist Thought. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Creel, Herrlee G. 1970. What Is Taoism?: And Other Studies in Chinese Cultural History. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. De George, Richard T. 1995. “Anarchism.” In The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Edited by Ted Honderich, 30–31. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Graham, A.C. 1989. Disputers of the Tao: Philosophical Argument in Ancient China. Chicago, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
  14. Guo, Xuezhi. 2002. The Ideal Chinese Political Leader: A Historical and Cultural Perspective. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  15. Hsiao, Kung-Chuan. 1979. A History of Chinese Political Thought, Vol. 1. Translated by F.W. Mote. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Lai, Karyn. 2006. Learning from Chinese Philosophies: Ethics of Interdependent and Contextualized Self. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  17. Lau, D.C., trans. 1963. Lao Tzu: Tao Te Ching. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  18. Marshall, Peter. 1992. Demanding the Impossible: A History of Anarchism. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  19. McLaughlin, Paul. 2007. Anarchism and Authority: A Philosophical Introduction to Classical Anarchism. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  20. Miller, David. 1984. Anarchism. London: Dent.Google Scholar
  21. Moeller, Hans-Georg. 2004. Daoism Explained: From the Dream of the Butterfly to the Fishnet Allegory. Chicago, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
  22. Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  23. Pennock, J. Roland, and John W. Chapman, eds. 1978. Anarchism: Nomos XIX. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Rapp, John A. 1998. “Daoism and Anarchism Reconsidered.” Anarchist Studies 6.2: 123–151.Google Scholar
  25. Schwartz, Benjamin I. 1985. The World and Thought in Ancient China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Seidel, Anna. 1989–1990. “Chronicle of Taoist Studies 1950–1980.” Cahier d’Extrême Asie 5: 273–278.Google Scholar
  27. Slingerland, Edward. 2003. Effortless Action: Wu-Wei as Conceptual Metaphor and Spiritual Ideal in Early China. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Sylvan, Richard. 2007. “Anarchism.” In A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy, 2nd edition, Vol. 1. Edited by Robert E. Goodin, Philip Pettit, and Thomas Pogge, 257–281. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  29. Verellen, Franciscus. 1995. “Taoism.” Journal of Asian Studies 54.2: 322–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of OklahomaNormanUSA

Personalised recommendations