Dao

, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp 269–282 | Cite as

A Right of Rebellion in the Mengzi?

Original Paper

Abstract

Mengzi believed that tyrannical rulers can be justifiably deposed, and many contemporary scholars see this as grounding a right of popular rebellion. I argue that the text of the Mengzi reveals a more mixed view, and does so in two respects. First, it suggests that the people are sometimes permitted to participate in a rebellion but not permitted to decide for themselves when rebellion is warranted. Second, it gives appropriate moral weight not to the people’s judgments about the justifiability of rebelling, but rather to certain affections and behaviors that closely track their life satisfaction. I contend that in both respects the permissions Mengzi grants the people fall short of a proper right of rebellion. I conclude that the more historical account of Mengzi’s “just revolt theory” suggests an intriguing division of deliberative labor, and note some of the advantages of this account.

Keywords

Mengzi Confucianism Revolution Rebellion Rights 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bell, Daniel A. 2006. Beyond Liberal Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Cheng, Chung-ying. 1998. “Transforming Human Virtues into Human Rights.” In Confucianism and Human Rights. Ed. By Wm. Theodore and de Bary and Tu Weiming. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ching, Julia. 1998. “Human Rights: A Valid Chinese Concept?” In Confucianism and Human Rights. Ed. By Wm. Theodore and de Bary and Tu Weiming. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  4. de Bary, Wm. Theodore. 1998. “Introduction.” In Confucianism and Human Rights. Ed. By Wm. Theodore and de Bary and Tu Weiming. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Hart, H.L.A. 1961. The Concept of Law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Lee, Seung-Hwan. 1992. “Was There a Concept of Rights in Confucian-Based Morality?” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 19: 241–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Locke, John. 1988. Two Treatises of Government. P. Laslett, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Mengzi 孟子譯注. 1990. Translated and annotated by Yang Bojun 楊伯峻. Beijing 北京: Zhonghua Shuju 中華書局.Google Scholar
  9. Tu, Wei-ming. 1993. Way, Learning, and Politics. Albany: SUNY.Google Scholar
  10. Twiss, Sumner B. 1998. “A Constructive Framework for Discussing Confucianism and Human Rights.” In de Bary and Tu 1998: 27–53.Google Scholar
  11. Xiao, Gongquan 蕭公權. 1983. A History of Chinese Political Thought 中國政治思想史, vol. 1. Taipei: Lianjing 聯經.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophySan Francisco State UniversitySan FranciscoUSA

Personalised recommendations