Dao

, Volume 6, Issue 4, pp 339–359

Sorrow and the Sage: Grief in the Zhuangzi

Article

Abstract

The Zhuangzi offers two apparently incompatible models of bereavement. Zhuangzi sometimes suggests that the sage will greet loss with unfractured equanimity and even aplomb. However, upon the death of his own wife, Zhuangzi evinces a sorrow that, albeit brief, fits ill with this suggestion. In this essay, I contend that the grief that Zhuangzi displays at his wife’s death better honors wider values averred elsewhere in the text and, more generally, that a sage who retains a capacity for sorrow will be better positioned for the robust joy so often identified as central to the Zhuangzi’s vision of flourishing. The sagely figures who entirely forego sorrow, I argue, achieve equanimity only through a sacrifice of the emotional range and responsiveness necessary not only for grief but also for the delight Zhuangzi recommends.

Keywords

Zhuangzi Daoism Death Grief 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ames, Roger T. 1998. “Death as Transformation in Classical Daoism.” In Death and Philosophy. Edited by Jeff Malpas and Robert C. Solomon. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Cohen, 1999. Jokes: Philosophical Thoughts on Joking Matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cohen, Ted. 2001. “Humor.” In The Routledge Companion to Aesthetics. Edited by Berys Gaut and Dominic McIver Lopes. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Epictetus. 1925. Discourses. Translated by W. A. Oldfather. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Graham, A. C. 1981. Chuang Tzu: The Inner Chapters. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  6. Hadot, Pierre. 1995. Philosophy as a Way of Life. Edited by Arnold I. Davidson, and translated by Michael Chase. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. Ivanhoe, Philip J. 2003. “Death and Dying in the Analects.” In Confucian Spirituality. Edited by Tu Wei-ming and Mary Evelyn Tucker. New York: Crossroad Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  8. _______. 2008. “The Values of Spontaneity.” In Taking Confucian Ethics Seriously: Contemporary Theories and Applications. Edited by Philip J. Ivanhoe, Yu Kam-por, and Julia Tao. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company (in press).Google Scholar
  9. Kupperman, Joel. 1999. Learning from Asian Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Nivison, David. 1991. “Hsun Tzu and Chuang Tzu.” In Chinese Texts and Philosophical Contexts. Edited by Henry Rosemont, Jr. LaSalle, IL: Open Court Press.Google Scholar
  11. Nussbaum, Martha. 1994. The Therapy of Desire. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Olberding, Amy. 2007. “Slowing Death Down: Mourning in the Analects.” In Confucius Now: Contemporary Encounters with the Analects. Edited by David Jones. LaSalle, IL: Open Court Press (in press).Google Scholar
  13. Seneca. 1917. Epistles. 3 vols. Translated by Richard M. Gummere. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Seneca, Lucius Annaeus. 1996. De Consolatione Ad Marciam. In Moral Essays. Vol. II, translated by John W. Basore. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Williams, Bernard. 1973. “The Makropulos Case: Reflections on the Tedium of Immortality.” In Problems of the Self. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of OklahomaNormanUSA

Personalised recommendations