Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Investigating peak stresses in fitting and repair patches of buried polyethylene gas pipes

  • 21 Accesses

Abstract

Nowadays, polyethylene composes a large number of natural gas distribution pipelines installed under the ground. The focus of the present contribution is two fold. One of the objectives is to investigate the applicability of polyethylene fittings in joining polyethylene gas pipes which are electrofused onto the pipe ends and buried under the ground, by estimating stress distribution using finite element method. The second objective is to study the effectiveness of polyethylene repair patches which are used to mend the defected pipelines by performing a finite element analysis to calculate peak stress values. Buried polyethylene pipelines in the natural gas industry, can be imposed by sever loadings including the soil-structure interaction, traffic load, soil’s column weight, internal pressure, and thermal loads resulting from daily and/or seasonal temperature changes. Additionally, due to the application of pipe joints, and repair patches local stresses superimposed on the aforementioned loading effects. The pipe is assumed to be made of PE80 resin and its jointing socket, and the repair patch is PE100 material. The computational analysis of stresses and the computer simulations are performed using ANSYS commercial software. According to the results, the peak stress values take place in the middle of the fitting and at its internal surface. The maximum stress values in fitting and pipe are below the allowable stresses which shows the proper use of introduced fitting is applicable even in hot climate areas of Ahvaz, Iran. Although the buried pipe is imposed to the maximum values of stresses, the PE100 socket is more sensitive to a temperature drop. Furthermore, all four studied patch arrangements show significant reinforcing effects on the defected section of the buried PE gas pipe to transfer applied loads. Meanwhile, the defected buried medium density polyethylene gas pipe and its saddle fused patch can resist the imposed mechanical and thermal loads of 22°C temperature increase. Moreover, increasing the saddle fusion patch length to 12 inches reduces the maximum stress values in the pipe, significantly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.

    Peacock A J. Handbook of Polyethylene: Structures, Properties, and Applications. New York: Marcel Dekker, 2000

  2. 2.

    Khademi-Zahedi R, Alimouri P. Finite element model updating of a large structure using multi-setup stochastic subspace identification method and bees optimization algorithm. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2018, 13(4): 965–980

  3. 3.

    Makvandi M, Bahmani H, Khademi-Zahedi R. Technical analysis of the causes of blowout in BiBi-Hakimeh well No. 76. In: Proceedings of the National Conference in New Research of Industry and Mechanical Engineering. Tehran: Civilica, 2015, 17–18

  4. 4.

    Khademi-Zahedi R, Makvandi M, Shishesaz M. The applicability of casings and liners composite patch repair in Iranian gas and oil wells. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference on Mechanical Engineering—ISME2014. Ahvaz: Civilica, 2014

  5. 5.

    Khademi-Zahedi R, Makvandi M, Shishesaz M. Technical analysis of the failures in a typical drilling mud pump during field operation. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference on Mechanical Engineering—ISME2014. Ahvaz: Civilica, 2014

  6. 6.

    Popelar C F. Characterization of mechanical properties for polyethylene gas pipe materials. Thesis for the Master’s Degree. Columbus: The Ohio State University, 1989

  7. 7.

    Peacock A J. Handbook of Polyethylene, Structures, Properties, and Applications. Texas: Exxon Chemical Company, Bayton, 2000

  8. 8.

    Cullis C F, Hirschler M. The Combustion of Organic Polymers. Oxford: Clarendos Press, 1981

  9. 9.

    Khademi Zahedi R, Alimouri P, Nguyen-Xuan H, Rabczuk T. Crack detection in a beam on elastic foundation using differential quadrature method and the Bees algorithm optimization. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Computational Mechanics. Singapore: Springer, 2017, Vol 36, 439–460

  10. 10.

    Areias P, Msekh M A, Rabczuk T. Damage and fracture algorithm using the screened Poisson equation and local remeshing. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2016, 158: 116–143

  11. 11.

    Rabczuk T, Bordas S, Zi G. On three-dimensional modelling of crack growth using partition of unity methods. Computers & Structures, 2010, 88(23–24): 1391–1411

  12. 12.

    Rabczuk T, Zi G, Bordas S, Nguyen-Xuan H. A geometrically nonlinear three dimensional cohesive crack method for reinforced concrete structures. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2008, 75(16): 4740–4758

  13. 13.

    Rabczuk T, Belytschko T. Application of particle methods to static fracture of reinforced concrete structures. International Journal of Fracture, 2006, 137(1–4): 19–49

  14. 14.

    Budarapu P R, Rabczuk T. Multiscale methods for fracture: A review. Journal of the Indian Institute of Science, 2017, 97(3): 339–376

  15. 15.

    Shirazi A H N, Abadi R, Izadifar M, Alajlan N, Rabczuk T. Mechanical responses of pristine and defective C3N nanosheets studied by molecular dynamics simulations. Computational Materials Science, 2018, 147: 316–321

  16. 16.

    Mortazavi B, Rabczuk T. Anisotropic mechanical properties and strain tuneable band-gap in single-layer SiP, SiAs, GeP and GeAs. Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures, 2018, 103: 273–278

  17. 17.

    Zhuo-Jia F, Qiang X, Wen C, Cheng A H D. A boundary-type meshless solver for transient heat conduction analysis of slender functionally graded materials with exponential variations. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2018, 425: 170–188

  18. 18.

    Zhou S, Zhuang X, Zhu H, Rabczuk T. Phase field modelling of crack propagation, branching and coalescence in rocks. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2018, 96: 174–192

  19. 19.

    Zhou S, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. A phase-field modeling approach of fracture propagation in poroelastic media. Engineering Geology, 2018, 240: 189–203

  20. 20.

    Zhou S, Rabczuk T, Zhuang X. Phase field modeling of quasi-static and dynamic crack propagation: COMSOL implementation and case studies. Advances in Engineering Software, 2018, 122: 31–49

  21. 21.

    Zhang C, Wang C, Lahmer T, He P, Rabczuk T. A dynamic XFEM formulation of crack identification. International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design, 2016, 12(4): 427–448

  22. 22.

    Budarapu P, Gracie R, Bordas S, Rabczuk T. An adaptive multiscale method for quasi-static crack growth. Computational Mechanics, 2014, 53(6): 1129–1148

  23. 23.

    Talebi H, Silani M, Bordas S, Kerfriden P, Rabczuk T. A computational library for multiscale modelling of material failure. Computational Mechanics, 2014, 53(5): 1047–1071

  24. 24.

    Rabczuk T, Zi G, Bordas S, Nguyen-Xuan H. A geometrically nonlinear three dimensional cohesive crack method for reinforced concrete structures. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2008, 75(16): 4740–4758

  25. 25.

    Amiri F, Anitescu C, Arroyo M, Bordas S, Rabczuk T. XLME interpolants, a seamless bridge between XFEM and enriched meshless methods. Computational Mechanics, 2014, 53(1): 45–57

  26. 26.

    Rabczuk T, Zi G. A meshfree method based on the local partition of unity for cohesive cracks. Computational Mechanics, 2007, 39(6): 743–760

  27. 27.

    Rabczuk T, Areias P M A, Belytschko T. A meshfree thin shell method for nonlinear dynamic fracture. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2007, 72(5): 524–548

  28. 28.

    Rabczuk T, Areias P M A. A meshfree thin shell for arbitrary evolving cracks based on an external enrichment. CMES-Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences, 2006, 16(2): 115–130

  29. 29.

    Rabczuk T, Zi G, Bordas S, Nguyen-Xuan H. A simple and robust three dimensional cracking-particle method without enrichment. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 199(37–40): 2437–2455

  30. 30.

    Rabczuk T, Belytschko T. A three dimensional large deformation meshfree method for arbitrary evolving cracks. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 196(29–30): 2777–2799

  31. 31.

    Rafiee R, Reshadi F. Simulation of functional failure in GRP moral pipes. Journal of composite structures, 2014, 113: 155–163

  32. 32.

    Watkins R K, Anderson L R. Structural Mechanics of Buried Pipes. New York: CRC Press, 2000, 22–57

  33. 33.

    Plastics Pipe Institute. Handbook of Polyethylene Pipe. Washington, D. C.: Plastics Pipe Institute, Inc., 2006, 261–303

  34. 34.

    Plastics Pipe Institute. Polyethylene Gas Pipes Systems, Uponor-Aldyl Company Installation Guide. Washington, D. C.: Plastics Pipe Institute, Inc., 2004

  35. 35.

    Goddard J B. Plastic Pipe Design. Technical Report 4.103. 1994

  36. 36.

    Moser A P, Folkman S. Buried Pipe Design 2. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2001

  37. 37.

    Kolonko A, Madryas C. Modernization of underground pipes in towns in Poland. Infrastructure, 1996, 11: 215–220

  38. 38.

    Khademi-Zahedi R. Stress Distribution in Patch Repaired Polyethylene Gas Pipes. Thesis for the Master’s Degree. Ahvaz: Shahid Chamran University, 2011

  39. 39.

    Khademi-Zahedi R. Application of the finite element method for evaluating the stress distribution in buried damaged polyethylene gas pipes. Underground Space, 2019, 4(1): 59–71

  40. 40.

    Khademi-Zahedi R, Shishesaz M. Application of a finite element method to stress distribution in buried patch repaired polyethylene gas pipe. Underground Space, 2019, 4(1): 48–58

  41. 41.

    Nasirian A. Investigating the application of polyethylene gas pipes for gas transportation. Thesis for the Master’s Degree. Ahvaz: Shahid Chamran University, 2007

  42. 42.

    Shishesaz M, Shishesaz M R. Applicability of medium density polyethylene gas pipes in hot climate areas of south-west Iran. Iranian Polymer Journal, 2008, 17: 503–517

  43. 43.

    Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LP. Buried pipe Design. Bull: Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LP, 2003, 81–115

  44. 44.

    AASHTO. Standard Specifications for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing. 15th ed. Washington D. C.: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 1990

  45. 45.

    Plastic Pipe and Building Products. ASTM Annual Book of ASTM Standards. Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Material, 1991

  46. 46.

    The Plastics Pipe Institute. Handbook of Polyethylene Pipe. Washington D. C.: Plastics Pipe Institute, Inc., 2006, 157–260

  47. 47.

    Corrugated Polyethylene Pipe Association. Structural Design Method for Corrugated Polyethylene Pipe. Washington D. C.: Corrugated Polyethylene Pipe Association, 2000

  48. 48.

    International Organization For Standardization. ISO 12162, Thermoplastics materials for pipes and fittings for pressure applications—Classification and designation—Overall Service (design) coefficient. ISO, 2004

Download references

Acknowledgements

The first author gratefully acknowledges Ali Nasirian for introducing the fundamental information on the buried pipe modeling. His memory will be with us always.

Author information

Correspondence to Reza Khademi Zahedi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khademi Zahedi, R., Alimouri, P., Khademi Zahedi, H. et al. Investigating peak stresses in fitting and repair patches of buried polyethylene gas pipes. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-019-0587-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Ansys software
  • polyethylene
  • buried pipelines
  • polyethylene joints
  • polyethylene patches
  • peak von Mises stress
  • soil-pipe interaction
  • temperature variation