Frontier of continuous structural health monitoring system for short & medium span bridges and condition assessment

  • Ayaho MiyamotoEmail author
  • Risto Kiviluoma
  • Akito Yabe
Research Article


It is becoming an important social problem to make maintenance and rehabilitation of existing short and medium span(10-20 m) bridges because there are a huge amount of short and medium span bridges in service in the world. The kernel of such bridge management is to develop a method of safety(condition) assessment on items which include remaining life and load carrying capacity. Bridge health monitoring using information technology and sensors is capable of providing more accurate knowledge of bridge performance than traditional strategies. The aim of this paper is to introduce a state-of-the-art on not only a rational bridge health monitoring system incorporating with the information and communication technologies for lifetime management of existing short and medium span bridges but also a continuous data collecting system designed for bridge health monitoring of mainly short and medium span bridges. In this paper, although there are some useful monitoring methods for short and medium span bridges based on the qualitative or quantitative information, mainly two advanced structural health monitoring systems are described to review and analyse the potential of utilizing the long term health monitoring in safety assessment and management issues for short and medium span bridge. The first is a special designed mobile in-situ loading device(vehicle) for short and medium span road bridges to assess the structural safety(performance) and derive optimal strategies for maintenance using reliability based method. The second is a long term health monitoring method by using the public buses as part of a public transit system (called bus monitoring system) to be applied mainly to short and medium span bridges, along with safety indices, namely, “characteristic deflection” which is relatively free from the influence of dynamic disturbances due to such factors as the roughness of the road surface, and a structural anomaly parameter.


condition assessment short & medium span bridge structural health monitoring(SHM) long-term data collection system maintenance bridge performance information technology loading vehicle(public bus) in-situ loading 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Boller C, Chang F, Fujino Y. Encyclopedia of Structural Health Monitoing. A John Wiley and Sons Ltd. Publication, 2009, 1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang T L, Zong Z. Final Report: Improvement of Evaluation Method for Existing Highway Bridges, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Florida International University, USA, 2002, 3Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aktan A E, Pervizpour M, Catbas N, Grimmelsman K, Barrish R, Curtis J, Qin X. Information Technology Research for Health Monitoring of Bridge Systems. Drexel University Intelligent Infrastructure and Transportation Safety Institute, Philadelphia, USA, 2002Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gutermann M, Schröder C. Loading Vehicle BELFA–development and experience gained in 10 years of practice–, Structural Health Monitoring and Maintenance of Short-& Medium-Span Bridges (Proceedings of CSHM-5), Yamaguchi University, Ube, Japan, 2013,10, (5), 1–17Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gutermann M, Slowik V, Steffens K. Experimental Safety Evaluation of Concrete and Masonry Bridges. International Symposium NDT-CE 2003 in Berlin, 2003Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Miyamoto A, Yabe A. Development of Practical Health Monitoring System for Short-and Medium-Span Bridges based on Vibration Responses of City Bus, Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, International Society for Structural Health Monitoring of Intelligent Infrastructure (ISHMII,), May 2012, 2(1): 47–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Japan Society of Civil Engineers (JSCE). Standard Specifications for Concrete Structures-2007. “Maintenance”, JSCE Guideline for Concrete, 2007Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Miyamoto A. Usage Management of Civil Structures. Encylopedia of Structural Health Monitoring(Ed. C. Boller, F. Chang & Y. Fujino), A John Weley & Sons Ltd. Publication, UK, Jan. 2009, 4 (Ch.93), 1635–1671Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wenzel H, Tanaka H. SAMCO Monitoring Glossary-Structural Dynamics for VBHM of Bridges, Austria, 2006Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Housner G A, Bergman L A, Caughey T K, Chassiakos A G, Claus R O, Masri S F, Skelton R E, Soong T T, Spencer B F, Yao J T P. Structural Control-Past, present and future-. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1997, 123(9): 897–971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wu Z S, Abe M. Structural Health Monitoring and Intelligent Infrastructure. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Structural Health Monitoring and Intelligent Infrastructure, Tokyo, Japan, Nov. 2003Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mufti A, Ansari F. Structural Health Monitoring. Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring of Innovative Civil Engineering Structures, ISIS Canada Research Network, Sept., 2004Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Japan Society of Civil Engineers(JSCE). Health Monitoring Technology for Concrete Structures. Concrete Technology Series, No. 76, JapanGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Guidelines for Structural Health Monitoring. The Canadian Network of Centers of Excellence on Intelligent Sensing for Innovative Structures. Design Manual No. 2, September, 2001Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Okada K, Shiraishi M. Structural Health Monitoring System using Displacement Memorizing Sensor (Part 1 and 2). Proceedings of Annual Meeting of Architectural Institute of Japan(AIJ), Sep, 2005 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Udwadia F E, Garba J A. Optimal Sensor Locations for Structural Identification. Proceedings of JPL Workshop on Identification and Control of Flexible Space Structure, 1985, 247–261Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kammer D C. Sensor Placement for on Orbit Modal Identification and Correlation of Large Space Structures. AIAA Journal, 1991, 26 (1): 104–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hemez F M, Farhat C. An Energy based Optimum Sensor Placement Criteria and Its Application to Structural Damage Detection. Proceedings of the 12th International Modal Analysis Conference, Society of Experimental Mechanics, Honolulu, 1994, 1568–1575Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Penny J E T, Friswell M J, Garvey S D. Automatic Choice of Measurement Locations for Dynamic Testing. AIAA Journal, 1994, 32(2): 407–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Udwadia F E. Methodology for Optimum Sensor Locations for Parameter Identification in Dynamic Systems. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 1994, 120(2): 368–390MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Heredia-Zavoni E, Esteva L. Optimal Instrumentation of Uncertain Structural Systems subject to Earthquake Motions. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1998, 27(4): 343–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cobb R G, Liebst B S. Sensor Location Prioritization and Structural Damage Localization using Minimal Sensor Information. AIAA Journal, 1997, 35(2): 369–374CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cobb R G, Liebst B S. Structural Damage Identification using Assigned Partial Eigenstructure. AIAA Journal, 1997, 35(1): 152–158CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shi Z Y, Law S S, Zhang L M. Optimizing Sensor Placement for Structural Damage Detection. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 2000, 126(11): 1173–1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Reynier M, Hisham A K. Sensors Location for Updating Problems. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 1999, 13(2): 297–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Xia Y, Hao H. Measurement Selection for Vibration-based Structural Damage Identification. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2000, 236(1): 89–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fu G K, Moosa A G. Health Monitoring of Structures using Optical Instrumentation and Probabilistic Diagnosis, Condition Monitoring of Materials and Structures (F. Ansari(Ed), 2000, 190–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Worden K, Burrows A P. Optimal Sensor Placement for Fault Detection. Engineering Structures, 2001, 23(8): 885–901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Smyth A W. The Potential of GPS and Other Displacement Sensing for Enhancing Acceleration Sensor Monitoring Array Data by Solving Low Frequency Integration Problems. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management and Cost, IABMAS04, Kyoto, Japan, Oct 2004, 533–540Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mita A, Takahira S. Damage Index Sensor for Smart Structures, Department of System Design Engineering, Keio University. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 2004, 17(3-4): 1–10Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mita A, Yoshikawa S. Digital Sensor Network Using Delta-Sigma Modulation for Health Monitoring of Large Structures. II ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Smart Structures and Materials, C.A. Mota Soares et al. (Eds.), Lisbon, Portugal, July 18–21, 2005Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gutermann M, Schröder C. Existing Structures-old and disused-Experimental Approaches for Extension of Lifetime. Proceedings of 50th Annual Conference on Experimental Stress Analysis, Tábor, Czech Republic, June, 2012Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    AfStb D. (Ed): Recommendation; Guideline for Load Testing of Concrete Structures. Beuth Verlag, Sept, 2000Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gutermann M. Ein Beitrag zur experimentell gestützten Tragsicherheitsbewertung von Massivbrücken. Dresden Technical University, PhD., thesis, 2003Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    DIN 1072. Short and Medium Span Bridges: Load Assumptions. German guideline, 12,1985Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    DIN EN 1990. Eurocode: Basis of Structural Design, German guideline, 12, 2010Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gutermann M. An Article on Experimental Assessment of Structural Safety of Solid Bridges, Proceedings of ICEM12; 12th International Conference on Experimental Mechanics, Politecnico di Bari, Italy, Sept, 2004Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lin C W, Yang Y B. Use of a Passing Vehicle to Scan the Fundamental Bridge Frequencies-An Experimental Verification. Engineering Structures, 2005, 27(13): 1865–1878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wu Z S. Structural Health Monitoring and Intelligent Infrastructures in Japan. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Structural Health Monitoring and Intelligent Infrastructure, Tokyo, Japan, Nov. 2003, 1: 153–167Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Chang K C, Kim C W, Kawatani M. Feasibility Investigation for a Bridge Damage Identification Method through Moving Vehicle Laboratory Experiment. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, Taylor & Francis, 2014, 10(3): 328–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Miyamoto A, Yabe A. Development of Practical Health Monitoring System for Short-and Medium-Span Bridges based on Vibration Responses of City Bus. Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring. International Society for Structural Health Monitoring of Intelligent Infrastructure, 2012, 2(1): 47–63 (ISHMII)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Miyamoto A, Isoda S. Sensitivity Analysis of Mechanical Behaviors for Bridge Damage Assessment. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, Techno-Press, 2012, 41(4): 539–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Miyamoto A, Yabe A. Bridge Condition Assessment based on Vibration Responses of Passenger Vehicle. Journal of Physics, 2011, 305(1): 1–10 (CS)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Yan Z, Miyamoto A, Jiang Z. Frequency Slice Wavelet Transform for Transient Vibration Response Analysis. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2009, 23(5): 1474–1489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Yabe A, Isoda S, Nagata M, Miyamoto A. Field Test on Short/Medium Span Bridge Monitoring System based on Public Bus Vibration. Proceedings of the 67th Annual Conference of the Japan Society of Civil Engineers(JSCE), 2012, VI–232Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management and Japan Prestressed Concrete Contractors Association. Joint Study on Refinement of Soundness Evaluation of Prestressed Concrete Highway Bridges, Chapter 4 (in Japanese), ISSN1346-7328, Technical Note of NILIM, 2010, 613, 99–105Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Yabe A, Miyamoto A, Isoda S, Tani N. Development of Techniques for Short/Medium-span Bridge Monitoring System using In-service Fixed-route Bus. Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshu, F4 (Construction Management), 2013, 69(2): 102–120Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Yabe A. Development of a method of analyzing dynamic moving body–structure in-teraction using the substructure method. Proceedings of the 61st Annual Conference of the Japan Society of Civil Engineers, 2006, 1–424, 845–846Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Kyoryo Shindo Kenkyukai. Measurement and Analysis of Bridge Vibration. Gihodo Shuppan, October 1993 version(in Japanese), 1993Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Japan Society of Civil Engineers(JSCE). Guidelines for Bridge Vibration Monitoring. Structural Engineering Series, 2000, 10: 110–119Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers(JSME). Computer Analysis in Mechanical Engineering, Corona Publishing, 1987Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Miyamoto A, Yabe A. Development of Practical Health Monitoring System for Short and Medium-span Bridges based on Vibration Responses of City Bus. Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring. ISHMII, 2012, 2(1): 47–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Yabe A, Miyamoto A, Nagata M. Verification Tests for Practical Application of a Health Monitoring System for Short-and Mediumspan Bridges based on Public Bus Vibrations, Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring. ISHMII, 2015, 5(1): 67–95Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Ube City Transportation Bureau(UTB). Ube City Municipal Bus Route Map (as of October 1, 2013),, 2013
  55. 55.
    Ube City. Bridge Life Extension and Rehabilitation Plan, December 2013 version,, 2013
  56. 56.
    Fuji Ceramics Corporation. Triaxial accelerometer specifications, January 24 published version 2012,, 2012
  57. 57.
    Yan Z H, Miyamoto A, Jiang Z W, Liu X L. An Overall Theoretical Description of Frequency Slice Wavelet Transform. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2010, 24(2): 325–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Miyamoto A, Yabe A, and Válter J G L. Damage Detection Sensitivity of a Vehicle-based Bridge Health Monitoring System. Jour. of Physics: Conf. Series 842, IOP Publishing, 2017, 1–12Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringAalto UniversityAaltoFinland
  2. 2.Sustainable Solutions Dept.KOZO KEIKAKU Eng. Inc.TokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations