Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 81–91 | Cite as

Deflection behavior of a prestressed concrete beam reinforced with carbon fibers at elevated temperatures

  • Mohammed FaruqiEmail author
  • Mohammed Sheroz Khan
Research Article


Fiber reinforced polymer(FRP) have unique advantages like high strength to weight ratio, excellent corrosion resistance, improving deformability and cost effectiveness. These advantages have gained wide acceptance in civil engineering applications. FRP tendons for prestressing applications are emerging as one of the most promising technologies in the civil engineering industry. However, the behavior of such members under the influence of elevated temperatures is still unknown. The knowledge and application of this could lead to a cost effective and practical considerations in fire safety design. Therefore, this study examines the deflection behavior of the carbon fiber reinforced polymer(CFRP) prestressed concrete beam at elevated temperatures. In this article, an analytical model is developed which integrates the temperature dependent changes of effective modulus of FRP in predicting the deflection behavior of CFRP prestressed concrete beams within the range of practical temperatures. This model is compared with a finite element mode (FEM) of a simply supported concrete beam prestressed with CFRP subjected to practical elevated temperatures. In addition, comparison is also made with an indirect reference to the real behavior of the material. The results of the model correlated reasonably with the finite element model and the real behavior. Finally, a practical application is provided.


FRP CFRP concrete elevated temperatures deflections prestress 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Faruqi M A, Roy S, Salem A A. Elevated temperature deflection behavior of concrete members reinforced with frp bars. Journal of Fire Protection Engineering, 2012, 22(3): 183–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Derkowski W. Opportunities and risks arising from the properties of FRP materials used for structural strengthening. Procedia Engineering, 2015, 108: 371–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tan K H. Fiber-reinforced polymer reinforcement for concrete structures. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on FRP Reinforcement for Concrete Structures (FRPRCS-6), Singapore 8–10 July, 2003Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Garcez M R, Meneghetti L C, Pinto L C. Applying post-tensioning technique to improve the performance of FRP post-strengthening. Fiber Reinforced Polymers-The Technology Applied for Concrete Repair, Dr. Martin Masuelli (Ed.), January, 2013Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Garcez M R, Silva Filho, GL CP, Meier U. Post-strengthening of reinforced concrete beams with prestressed CFRP strips. Part 1: analysis under static loading, Revista IBRACON de Estruturas Materiais, 2012, 5(3): 343–361Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Selvachandran P, Anandakumar S, Muthuramu K. Deflection Behavior of Prestressed Concrete Beam using Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Tendon, The Open Civil. Engineering Journal (New York), 2016, 10: 40–60Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Atutis M, Valivonis J, Atutis E. Experimental Study of Concrete Beams Prestressed with Basalt Fiber Reinforced Polymers. Part I: Flexural Behavior and Serviceability. Composites Structures, 2017Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lou T, Lopes S, Lopes A A. Comparative study of continuous beams prestressed with bonded frp and steel tendons. Composite Structures, 2015, 124: 100–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kamaitis Z. Damage to concrete bridges due to reinforcement corrosion: Part II-Design considerations. Transport, 2002, 17(5): 163–170Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Benichou N, Kodur V K, Green M F, Bisby L A. Fire performance of fiber-reinforced polymer systems used for the repair of concrete buildings. Construction Technology Update No. 74, August, 2010Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bukhari I A, Vollum R L, Ahmad S, Sagaseta J. Shear strengthening of reinforced concrete beams with CFRP. Magazine of Concrete Research, 2010, 62(1): 65–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zou P. Theoretical study on short-term and long-term deflections of fiber reinforced polymer prestressed concrete beams. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2003, 7(4): 285–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Braimah A. Long-term and fatigue behavior of carbon fiber reinforced polymer prestressed concrete beams. Doctoral dissertation, Queen’s University, Kingston, September, 2000Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kang T H K, Ary M I. Shear strengthening of reinforced & prestressed concrete beams using FRP: Part II-Experimental investigation. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 2012, 6(1): 49–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Agarwal B D, Broutman L J, Chandrashek H K. Analysis and Performance of Fiber Composites, 3rd ed. Wiley, 2006, p.576.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    ACI Committee 435. Control of deflection in concrete structures, ACI 435R-95. Farmington Hills, Michigan: American Concrete Institute, 2003Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kodur V A. Properties of concrete at elevated temperatures. International Scholarly Research Notices in Civil Engineering, 2014, article ID 468510, 1–15.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    European Standard EN 1992-1-2: 2004. Design of concrete structures. Part 1-2: general rules structural fire design, Eurocode 2, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, 2004Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Phan L T. Fire performance of high-strength concrete: a report of the state-of-the-art. Technical report., National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Md, USA, 1996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Samaniego E, Oliver X, Huespe A. Contributions to the continuum modelling of strong discontinuities on two-dimensional solids. Monograph CIMNE No.72, International Center for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Barcelona, Spain, 2003Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Belytschko T, Black T. Elastic crack growth in finite elements with minimal remeshing. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1999, 45(5): 601–620CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Belytschko T, Moes N, Usui S, Parimi C. Arbitrary discontinuities in finite elements. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2001, 50(4): 993–1013CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wells G N, Sluys L J. A new method for modelling cohesive cracks using finite elements. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2001, 50(12): 2667–2682CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Xu X P, Needleman A. Numerical simulations of dynamic crack growth along an interface. International Journal of Fracture, 1996, 74(4): 289–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Belytschko T, Lu Y Y, Gu L. Element-free Galerkin methods. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1994, 37(2): 229–256MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Belytschko T, Lu Y Y, Gu L, Tabbara M. Element-free Galerkin methods for static and dynamic fracture. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 1995, 32(17-18): 2547–2570CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rabczuk T, Belytschko T. Application of particle methods to static fracture of reinforced concrete structures. International Journal of Fracture, 2006, 137(1-4): 19–49CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rabczuk T, Zi G, Bordas S, Nguyen-Xuan H. A geometrically nonlinear three-dimensional cohesive crack method for reinforced concrete structures. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2008, 75(16): 4740–4758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rabczuk T, Akkermann J, Eibl J. A numerical model for reinforced concrete structures. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2005, 42(5-6): 1327–1354CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    ASCE, ASCE 7-05. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures, Including Supplement No. 1. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 2006Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wang Y C, Wong P H, Kodur V. Mechanical properties of fibre reinforced polymer reinforcing bars at elevated temperatures. Structures for Fire, 2010, 1–10Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    ACI Committee 318. Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-05) and commentary (ACI 318R-05) Farmington Hills, Mich: American Concrete Institute, 2005Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Schmit K, Rouge B. Fiberglass reinforced plastic (FRP) piping systems: designing process/facilities piping systems with FRP: A comparison to traditional metallic materials. EDO Specialty Plastics, EKGS-ES-042-001, 1998Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kodur V, Ahmed A, Dawaikat M. Modeling the fire performance of FRP strengthened reinforced concrete beams. Composites and Polycon, American Composites Manufacturers Association, Tampa, Florida, 2009, 15–17Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Architectural EngineeringTexas A&M UniversityKingsvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations