Advertisement

Linear and nonlinear elastic analysis of closely spaced strip foundations using Pasternak model

  • Priyanka Ghosh
  • S. Rajesh
  • J. Sai Chand
Research Article

Abstract

In this study, an attempt is made to determine the interaction effect of two closely spaced strip footings using Pasternak model. The study considers small strain problem and has been performed using linear as well as nonlinear elastic analysis to determine the interaction effect of two nearby strip footings. The hyperbolic stress-strain relationship has been considered for the nonlinear elastic analysis. The linear elastic analysis has been carried out by deriving the equations for the interference effect of the footings in the framework of Pasternak model equation; whereas, the nonlinear elastic analysis has been performed using the finite difference method to solve the second order nonlinear differential equation evolved from Pasternak model with proper boundary conditions. Results obtained from the linear and the nonlinear elastic analysis are presented in terms of non-dimensional interaction factors by varying different parameters like width of the foundation, load on the foundation and the depth of the rigid base. Results are suitably compared with the existing values in the literature.

Keywords

bearing capacity linear and non-linear elasticity foundation interaction effect numerical modeling Pasternak model 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Stuart J G. Interference between foundations with special reference to surface footings in sand. Geotechnique, 1962, 12(1): 15–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    West J M, Stuart J G. Oblique loading resulting from interference between surface footings on sand. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Soil Mechanics. Montreal, 1965, 2: 214–217Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Graham J, Raymond G P, Suppiah A. Bearing capacity of three closely-spaced footings on sand. Geotechnique, 1984, 34(2): 173–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kumar J, Ghosh P. Ultimate bearing capacity of two interfering rough strip footings. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2007, 7 (1): 53–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kumar A, Saran S. Closely spaced footings on geogrid-reinforced sand. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2003, 129(7): 660–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Griffiths D V, Fenton G A, Manoharan N. Undrained bearing capacity of two-strip footings on spatially random soil. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2006, 6(6): 421–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kumar J, Ghosh P. Upper bound limit analysis for finding interference effect of two nearby strip footings on sand. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2007, 25(5): 499–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kumar J, Kouzer K M. Bearing capacity of two interfering footings. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2008, 32(3): 251–264CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kouzer K M, Kumar J. Ultimate bearing capacity of a footing considering the interference of an existing footing on sand. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2010, 28(4): 457–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kumar J, Bhattacharya P. Bearing capacity of two interfering strip footings from lower bound finite elements limit analysis. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2013, 37(5): 441–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mabrouki A, Benmeddour D, Frank R, Mellas M. Numerical study of the bearing capacity for two interfering strip footings on sands. Computers and Geotechnics, 2010, 37(4): 431–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ghosh P, Sharma A. Interference effect of two nearby strip footings on layered soil: theory of elasticity approach. Acta Geotechnica, 2010, 5(3): 189–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee J, Eun J, Prezzi M, Salgado R. Strain influence diagrams for settlement estimation of both isolated and multiple footings in sand. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2008, 134(4): 417–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nainegali L S, Basudhar P K, Ghosh P. Interference of two asymmetric closely spaced strip footings resting on nonhomogeneous and linearly elastic soil bed. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2013, 13(6): 840–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Saran S, Agarwal V C. Interference of surface footings in sand. Indian Geotechnical Journal, 1974, 4(2): 129–139Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Deshmukh A M. Interaction of different types of footings on sand. Indian Geotechnical Journal, 1979, 9: 193–204Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Das B M, Larbi-Cherif S. Bearing capacity of two closely spaced shallow foundations on sand. Soil and Foundation, 1983, 23(1): 1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Das B M, Puri V K, Neo B K. Interference effects between two surface footings on layered soil. Transportation Research Record 1406, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1993, 34–40Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kumar J, Bhoi M K. Interference of two closely spaced strip footings on sand using model tests. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2009, 135(4): 595–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ghosh P, Kumar S R. Interference effect of two nearby strip surface footings on cohesionless layered soil. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 5(1): 87–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Srinivasan V, Ghosh P. Experimental investigation on interaction problem of two nearby circular footings on layered cohesionless soil. Geomechanics and Geoengineering, 2013, 8(2): 97–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rabczuk T, Belytschko T. A three dimensional large deformation meshfree method for arbitrary evolving cracks. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 196(29–30): 2777–2799MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rabczuk T, Zi G, Bordas S, Nguyen-Xuan H. A simple and robust three-dimensional cracking-particle method without enrichment. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 199(37–40): 2437–2455CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Areias P, Rabczuk T, Dias-da-Costa D. Element-wise fracture algorithm based on rotation of edges. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2013, 110: 113–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nguyen-Xuan H, Liu G R, Bordas S, Natarajan S, Rabczuk T. An adaptive singular ES-FEM for mechanics problems with singular field of arbitrary order. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 253: 252–273MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Amiri F, Anitescu C, Arroyo M, Bordas S P A, Rabczuk T. XLME interpolants, a seamless bridge between XFEM and enriched meshless methods. Computational Mechanics, 2014, 53(1): 45–57MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Areias P, Rabczuk T, Camanho P P. Finite strain fracture of 2D problems with injected anisotropic softening elements. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2014, 72: 50–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nguyen-Xuan H, Liu G R. An edge-based finite element method (ES-FEM) with adaptive scaled-bubble functions for plane strain limit analysis. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2015, 285: 877–905MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nguyen-Xuan H, Rabczuk T. Adaptive selective ES-FEM limit analysis of cracked plane-strain structures. Frontiers in Civil Engineering, 2015, 9(4): 478–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nguyen-Xuan H, Wu C T, Liu G R. An adaptive selective ES-FEM for plastic collapse analysis. European Journal of Mechanics. A, Solids, 2016, 58: 278–290MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pasternak P L. On a new method of analysis of an elastic foundation by means of two foundation constants. Gosudarstvennoe Izdatelstro Liberaturi po Stroitelstvui Arkhitekture, Moscow, 1954Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vlazov V Z, Leontiev U N. Beams, plates and shells on elastic foundations. Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem, 1966Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Konder R L, Zelasko J S. Void ratio effects on the hyperbolic stress strain response of a sand. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1963, 2 (1): 40–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Timoshenko S P, Goodier J N. Theory of elasticity. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1970zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Selvadurai A P S. Elastic Analysis of Soil Foundation Interaction. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, The Netherlands, 1979Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Das B M. Principles of Geotechnical Engineering. 5th ed. Thomson Brooks/Cole, India, 2007Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nainegali L S. Finite element analysis of two symmetric and asymmetric interfering footings resting on linearly and non-linearly elastic foundation beds. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree, IIT Kanpur, 2014Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringIndian Institute of TechnologyKanpur, KanpurIndia

Personalised recommendations