Vibration testing of a steel girder bridge using cabled and wireless sensors

Research Article

Abstract

Being able to significantly reduce system installation time and cost, wireless sensing technology has attracted much interest in the structural health monitoring (SHM) community. This paper reports the field application of a wireless sensing system on a 4-span highway bridge located in Wayne, New Jersey in the US. Bridge vibration due to traffic and ambient excitation is measured. To enhance the signal-to-noise ratio, a low-noise high-gain signal conditioning module is developed for the wireless sensing system. Nineteen wireless and nineteen cabled accelerometers are first installed along the sidewalk of two neighboring bridge spans. The performance of the wireless sensing system is compared with the high-precision cabled sensing system. In the next series of testing, 16 wireless accelerometers are installed under the deck of another bridge span, forming a 4 × 4 array. Operating deflection analysis is successfully conducted using the wireless measurement of traffic and ambient vibrations.

Keywords

wireless sensing structural health monitoring (SHM) signal conditioning operating deflection analysis ambient vibration 

References

  1. 1.
    ASCE. Report Card for America’s Infrastructure. American Society of Civil Engineers. Reston, VA, 2009Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Farrar C R, Sohn H, Hemez F M, Anderson M C, Bement M T, Cornwell P J, Doebling S W, Schultze J F, Lieven N, Robertson A N. Damage Prognosis: Current Status and Future Needs. Report No. LA-14051-MS, Los Alamos National Laboratory. Los Alamos, NM, 2003Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ko J M, Ni Y Q. Technology developments in structural health monitoring of large-scale bridges. Engineering Structures, 2005, 27 (12): 1715–1725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Celebi M. Seismic Instrumentation of Buildings (with Emphasis on Federal Buildings). Report No. 0-7460-68170, United States Geological Survey. Menlo Park, CA, 2002Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Straser E G, Kiremidjian A S. A modular, wireless damage monitoring system for structures. Report No. 128, John A. Blune Earthquake Eng Ctr Stanford: Stanford University, 1998Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Spencer B F Jr, Ruiz-Sandoval M E, Kurata N. Smart sensing technology: opportunities and challenges. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 2004, 11(4): 349–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu L, Yuan F G, Zhang F. Development of wireless smart sensor for structural health monitoring. In: Proceedings of SPIE, Smart Structures and Materials 2005: Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems. San Diego, CA, 2005, 176–186Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lynch J P, Loh K J. A summary review of wireless sensors and sensor networks for structural health monitoring. Shock and Vibration Digest, 2006, 38(2): 91–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lynch J P, Law K H, Kiremidjian A S, Carryer E, Farrar C R, Sohn H, Allen D W, Nadler B and Wait J R. Design and performance validation of a wireless sensing unit for structural health monitoring applications. Structural Engineering & Mechanics, 2004, 17: 393–408Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim S, Pakzad S, Culler D, Demmel J, Fenves G, Glaser S, Turon M. Health monitoring of civil infrastructures using wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN’07). Cambridge, MA, 2007: 254–263Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rice J A, Mechitov K, Sim S H, Nagayama T, Jang S, Kim R, Spencer B F, Agha G, Fujino Y. Flexible smart sensor framework for autonomous structural health monitoring. Smart Structures and Systems, 2010, 6(5–6): 423–438Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang Y, Lynch J P, Law K H. A wireless structural health monitoring system with multithreaded sensing devices: design and validation. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2007, 3(2): 103–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lynch J P, Wang Y, Loh K J, Yi J H, Yun C B. Performance monitoring of the Geumdang Bridge using a dense network of highresolution wireless sensors. Smart Materials and Structures, 2006, 15(6): 1561–1575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang Y, Loh K J, Lynch J P, Fraser M, Law K H, Elgamal A. Vibration monitoring of the Voigt Bridge using wired and wireless monitoring systems. In: Proceedings of the 4th China-Japan-US Symposium on Structural Control and Monitoring. Hangzhou, China, 2006Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Weng J H, Loh C H, Lynch J P, Lu K C, Lin P Y, Wang Y. Outputonly modal identification of a cable-stayed bridge using wireless monitoring systems. Engineering Structures, 2008, 30(7): 1820–1830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Swartz R A, Jung D, Lynch J P, Wang Y, Shi D, Flynn M P. Design of a wireless sensor for scalable distributed in-network computation in a structural health monitoring system. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring. Stanford, CA, 2005Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zimmerman A T, Shiraishi M, Swartz R A, Lynch J P. Automated modal parameter estimation by parallel processing within wireless monitoring systems. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 2008, 14(1): 102–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Swartz R A, Lynch J P. Strategic network utilization in a wireless structural control system for seismically excited structures. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2009, 135(5): 597–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Horowitz P, Hill W. The Art of Electronics. London: Cambridge University Press, 1989Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Farrar C R, James G H. System identification from ambient vibration measurements on a bridge. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1997, 205(1): 1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Juang J N, Pappa R S. An eigensystem realization algorithm for modal parameter identification and modal reduction. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 1985, 8(5): 620–627MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Civil and Environmental EngineeringGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Structural EngineeringThe University of SheffieldSheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations