Numerical analysis of nonlinear dynamic behavior of earth dams

Research Article

Abstract

A numerical study is conducted to investigate the dynamic behavior of earth dams. The numerical investigation employs a fully nonlinear dynamic finite difference analysis incorporating a simple elastic perfectly plastic constitutive model to describe the stress-strain response of the soil and the Rayleigh damping to increase the level of hysteretic damping. The extended Masing rules are implemented into the constitutive model to explain more accurately the soil response under general cyclic loading. The soil stiffness and hysteretic damping change with loading history. The procedures for calibrating the constructed numerical model with centrifuge test data and also a real case history are explained. For the latter, the Long Valley (LV) earth dam subjected to the 1980 Mammoth Lake earthquake as a real case-history is analyzed and the obtained numerical results are compared with the real measurements at the site in both the time and frequency domains. Relatively good agreement is observed between computed and measured quantities. It seems that the Masing rules combined with a simple elasto-plastic model gives reasonable numerical predictions. Afterwards, a comprehensive parametric study is carried out to identify the effects of dam height, input motion characteristics, soil behavior, strength of the shell materials and dam reservoir condition on the dynamic response of earth dams. Three real earthquake records with different levels and peak acceleration values (PGAs) are used as input motions. The results show that the crest acceleration decreases when the dam height increases and no amplification is observed. Further, more inelastic behavior and more earthquake energy absorption are observed in higher dams.

Keywords

earth dam numerical nonlinear response dynamic analysis earthquake dam height 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Sherard J L. Earthquake considerations in earth dam design. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 1967, 93: 377–401Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Seed H B, Lee K L, Idriss I M, Makdisi F I. The slides in the San Fernando dams during the earthquake of February 9, 1971. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 1975, 101(GT7): 651–688Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ambraseys N N. The seismic stability of earth dams. In: Proceedings of the Second World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo, Japan. 1960, 1345–1363Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    USCOLD (US Committee on Large Dams). Observed Performance of Dams during Earthquakes. Committee on Earthquakes, Denver, CO, 1992Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gazetas G. Seismic response of earth dams: some recent developments. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 1987, 6(1): 2–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Prevost J, Abdel-Ghaffar A M, Lacy S. Nonlinear dynamic analyses of an earth dam. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1985, 111(7): 882–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lacy S J, Prevost J H. Nonlinear seismic response analysis of earth dams. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 1987, 6(1): 48–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Abouseeda H, Dakoulas P. Non-linear dynamic earth damfoundation interaction using a BE-FE method. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics. 1998, 27(9): 917–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen M, Harichandran R S. Response of an earth dam to spatially varying earthquake ground motion. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2001, 127(9): 932–939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cascone E, Rampello S. Decoupled seismic analysis of an earth dam. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2003, 23(5): 349–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ming H Y, Li X S. Fully coupled analysis of failure and remediation of lower San Fernando dam. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2003, 129(4): 336–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Adalier K, Sharp MK. Embankment dam on liquefiable foundation-dynamic behavior and densification remediation. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2004, 130(11): 1214–1224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Papalou A, Bielak J. Nonlinear seismic response of earth dams with Canyon interaction. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2004, 130(1): 103–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ebrahimian B, Vafaeian M. Effects of dam height on the seismic response of earth dam. In: Proceedings of the 7nd International Conference on Civil Engineering, Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran, Iran. 2005Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang Z L, Makdisi F I, Egan J. Practical applications of a nonlinear approach to analysis of earthquake-induced liquefaction and deformation of earth structures. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2006, 26(2–4): 231–252MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Siyahi B, Arslan H. Nonlinear dynamic finite element simulation of Alibey earth dam. Environmental Geology (Berlin), 2008, 54(1): 77–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Siyahi B, Arslan H. Earthquake induced deformation of earth dams. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2008, 67(3): 397–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sica S, Pagano L, Modaressi A. Influence of past loading history on the seismic response of earth dams. Computers and Geotechnics, 2008, 35(1): 61–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rampello S, Cascone E, Grosso N. Evaluation of the seismic response of a homogeneous earth dam. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2009, 29(5): 782–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ebrahimian B. Numerical modeling of the seismic response of an earth dam founded on liquefiable soils. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Long Term Behavior of Dams, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria. 2009, 610–615Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Masing G. Eigenspannungen und Verfestigung Beim Messing. In: Proceedings of 2nd International Congress on Applied Mechanics, Zurich. 1926Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Itasca Consulting Group, Inc. FLAC (Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua). Version 4. Minneapolis, MN, 2004Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kokusho T, Esashi Y. Cyclic tri-axial test on sands and coarse material. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 1981 (Quoted by Ishihara 1986)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hardin B O, Black W L. Vibration modulus of normally consolidated clay. Journal of the Soil Mechanics & Foundation Division, ASCE, 1968, 94(2): 353–369Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Seed H B, Wong R T, Idriss IM, Tokimatsu K. Moduli and damping factors for dynamic analyses of cohesionless soils. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 1986, 112(11): 1016–1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vucetic M, Dobry R. Effects of the soil plasticity on cyclic response. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 1991, 117(1): 89–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lysmer J, Kuhlmeyer R L. Finite element method for infinite media. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1969, 95(EM4): 859–877Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kuhlmeyer R L, Lysmer J. Finite element method accuracy for wave propagation problems. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 1973, 99(SM5): 421–427Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    USCOLD (US Committee on Large Dams). Updated guidelines for selecting seismic parameters for dam projects. Committee on Large Dams, Denver, CO, 1999Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Finn W D L, Lee K W, Martin G R. An effective stress model for liquefaction. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 1977, 103(6): 517–553Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Arulanandan K, Scott R F, eds. Verification of numerical procedures for the analysis of soil liquefaction problems. Vol. 1. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on the Verification of Numerical Procedures for the Analysis of Soil Liquefaction Problems, Davis, California, 17–20 October 1993. Rotterdam: Balkema A A, 1993Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Arulanandan K, Scott R F, eds. Verification of numerical procedures for the analysis of soil liquefaction problems. Vol. 2. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on the Verification of Numerical Procedures for the Analysis of Soil Liquefaction Problems, Davis, California, 17–20 October 1993. Rotterdam: Balkema A A, 1994Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Griffiths D V, Prevost J H. Two- and three-dimensional dynamic finite element analyses of the Long Valley dam. Geotechnique, 1988, 38(3): 367–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lai S S, Seed H B. Dynamic Response of Long Valley dam in the Mammoth Lake Earthquake Series of May 25–27 1980. Report No. UCB/EERC-85/12. Earthquake Engineering Research Center, 1985Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Elgamal A M, Abdel-Ghaffar A M, Prevost J H. 2-D elastoplastic seismic shear response of earth dams: application. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1987, 113(5): 702–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yiagos A N, Prevost J H. Tow-phase elasto-plastic seismic response of earth dams: applications. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 1991, 10(7): 371–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zeghal M, Abdel-Ghaffar A M. Analysis of behavior of earth dam using strong-motion earthquake records. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1992, 118(2): 266–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Woodward P K, Griffiths D V. Non-linear dynamic analysis of the Long Valley dam. Compute Methods and Advances in Geomechanics, 1996, 11(6): 635–644Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ohmachi T, Kuwano J. Dynamic safety of earth and rock fill dams. Rotterdam: Balkema A A, 1994Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ebrahimian B. Evaluating the seismic behavior (and considering the failure mechanism) of earth dams by using finite difference approach. Dissertation for the Master Degree. Isfahan: Department of Civil Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, 2004Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Özkan M, Özyazicioglu M, Aksar U D. An evaluation of Güldürcek dam response during 6 June 2000 Orta earthquake. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2006, 26(5): 405–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Civil Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of TehranTehranIran
  2. 2.Institute of Applied Mechanics, Faculty of Civil EngineeringGraz University of TechnologyGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations