Control of wind-induced vibration of long-span bridges and tall buildings

Research Article

Abstract

With the rapid increase in scales of structures, research on controlling wind-induced vibration of large-scale structures, such as long-span bridges and super-tall buildings, has been an issue of great concern. For wind-induced vibration of large-scale structures, vibration frequencies and damping modes vary with wind speed. Passive, semiactive, and active control strategies are developed to improve the wind-resistance performance of the structures in this paper. The multiple tuned mass damper (MTMD) system is applied to control vertical bending buffeting response. A new semiactive lever-type tuned mass damper (TMD) with an adjustable frequency is proposed to control vertical bending buffeting and torsional buffeting and flutter in the whole velocity range of bridge decks. A control strategy named sinusoidal reference strategy is developed for adaptive control of wind-induced vibration of super-tall buildings. Multiple degrees of freedom general building aeroelastic model with a square cross-section is tested in a wind tunnel. The results demonstrate that the proposed strategies can reduce vibration effectively, and can adapt to wind-induced vibration control of large-scale structures in the uncertain dynamic circumstance.

Keywords

long-span bridge tall building wind-induced vibration tuned mass damper(TMD) multiple tuned mass damper (MTMD) semiactive tuned mass damper adaptive feedforward sinusoidal reference strategy wind tunnel test 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Wardlaw R. The improvement of aerodynamic performance. In: Larsen A, ed. Aerodynamics of Large Bridges. Rotterdam: Balkema, 1992, 59–70Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wilde K, Fujino Y. Aerodynamic control of bridge deck flutter by active surfaces. J Eng Mech, ASCE, 1998, 124(7): 718–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wilde K, Fujino Y, Kawakami T. Analytical and experimental study on passive aerodynamic control of flutter of a bridge deck. J Wind Eng Indust Aerodyn, 1999, 80: 105–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gu M, Xiang H F, Lin Z X. Flutter-and buffeting-based selection for long-span bridges. J Wind Eng Indust Aerodyn, 1999, 80: 373–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nobuto J, Fujino Y, Ito M. A study on the effectiveness of T.M.D. To suppress a coupled flutter of bridge deck. In: Proceedings of Japan Society of Civil Engineering, 1998, 398/1–10: 413–416Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gu M, Chang C C, Wu W, Xiang H F. Increase of critical flutter wind speed of long-span bridges using tuned mass dampers. J Wind Eng Indust Aerodyn, 1998, 73: 111–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lin Yuh-Yi, Cheng C M, Lee C H. Multiple tuned mass dampers for controlling coupled buffeting and flutter of long-span bridges. Wind & Structures, An International Journal, 1999, 2(4): 267–248Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Saeid P, Datta T K. Control of flutter of suspension bridge deck using TMD. Wind & Structures, An International Journal, 2002, 5(5): 407–422Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gu M, Xiang H F. Optimization of TMD for suppressing buffeting response of long-span bridges. J Wind Eng Indust Aerodyn, 1992, 42: 1383–1392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gu M, Xiang H F, Chen A R. A practical method of passive TMD for suppressing wind-induced vertical buffeting of long-span cable-stayed bridges and its application. J Wind Eng Indust Aerodyn, 1994, 51: 203–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gu M, Chen S R, Chang C C. Parametric study on multiple tuned mass dampers for buffeting control of Yangpu Bridge. J Wind Eng Indust Aerodyn, 2001, 89: 987–1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chang C C, Gu M, Tang K H. Tuned mass dampers for dual-mode buffeting control of bridges. J Bridge Eng, ASCE, 2003, 8(4): 237–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen S R, Cai C S, Gu M, Chang C C. Optimal variables of TMDs for multi-mode buffeting control of long-span bridges. Wind & Structures, An International Journal, 2003, 6(5): 387–402Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gu M, Chen S R, Chang C C. Control of wind-induced vibrations of long-span bridges by semi-active lever-type TMD. J Wind Eng Indust Aerodyn, 2002, 90: 111–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Burdisso R A, Suarez L E, Fuller C R. Feasibility study of adaptive control of structures under seismic excitation. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1994, 120(3): 580–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Burdisso R A. Structural attenuation due to seismic inputs with adaptive hybird control system. Applied Mechanics Review, 1995, 48(Suppl 11): 143–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ma K G, Chen X, Gu Z, Gu M. Adaptive control of wind-induced vibration of flexible civil structures: Methods and experiments. Journal of Vibration Engineering, 1998, 11(2): 1–7 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Scanlan R H, Tomko J J. Airfoil and bridge deck flutter derivatives. J Eng Mech Div, ASCE, 1971, 97(6): 1712–1737Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Igusa T, Xu K. Vibration reduction characteristics of distributed tuned mass dampers. In: Petyt M, et al, eds. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Recent Advances in Structural Dynamics, Southampton, UK, 1991, 596–605Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Current Code for Design of Bridges and Culverts—Code of the Ministry of Communications of China. JTJ-021-89. Renming Jiaotong Press, 1989 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gu M, Chen S R, Chang C C. Buffeting control of the Yangpu Bridge using multiple tuned mass dampers. In: A Larsen, G L Larose, F M Livesey, eds. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Wind Engineering. Rotterdam: Balkema, 1999, 893–898Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gu M, Xu Y L, Chen L Z, Xiang H F. Fatigue life estimation of steel girder of Yangpu Cable-Stayed Bridge due to buffeting. J. Wind Eng Indust Aerodyn, 1999, 80: 383–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Peng F J, Gu M, Niemann H-J. Sinusoidal reference strategy for adaptive feedforward vibration control: Numerical simulation and experimental study. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2003, 265(5): 1047–1061CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Peng F J, Gu M, Niemann H-J. Study on sinusoidal reference strategy-based adaptive feedforward control applied to benchmark wind-excited building. J Eng Mech, ASCE, 2004, 130(4): 518–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Widrow B, Stearns S D. Adaptive Signal Processing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1985MATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gu M, Peng F J. An experimental study of active control of wind-induced vibration of super-tall buildings. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2002, 90(12–15): 1919–1931CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory for Disaster Reduction in Civil EngineeringTongji UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations