Optical performance analysis of an innovative linear focus secondary trough solar concentrating system
- 11 Downloads
The parabolic trough solar concentrating system has been well developed and widely used in commercial solar thermal power plants. However, the conventional system has its drawbacks when connecting receiver tube parts and enhancing the concentration ratio. To overcome those inherent disadvantages, in this paper, an innovative concept of linear focus secondary trough concentrating system was proposed, which consists of a fixed parabolic trough concentrator, one or more heliostats, and a fixed tube receiver. The proposed system not only avoids the end loss and connection problem on the receiver during the tracking process but also opens up the possibility to increase the concentration ratio by enlarging aperture. The design scheme of the proposed system was elaborated in detail in this paper. Besides, the optical performance of the semi and the whole secondary solar trough concentrator was evaluated by using the ray tracing method. This innovative solar concentrating system shows a high application value as a solar energy experimental device.
Keywordssecondary parabolic trough solar concentrator ray tracing method linear focus concentration ratio optical performance
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
This work was financed by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFE0201800).
- 3.Pharabod F, Philibert C. LUZ solar power plants: success in California and worldwide prospects. DLR (German Aerospace Center) and IEA-SSPS (Solar PACES), Cologne, Germany, 1991Google Scholar
- 4.Dudley V E, Kolb G J, Mahoney A R, Mancini T R, Matthews CW, Sloan M, Kearney D. Test results: SEGS LS-2 solar collector. Technical Report, Sandia National Labs, 1994Google Scholar
- 5.Nava P, Aringhoff R, Svoboda P, Kearney D. Status rep on solar trough power plants. Technical Report. Pilkington Solar International, Germany, 1996Google Scholar
- 7.Geyer M, Lüpfert E, Osuna R, Esteban A, Schiel W, Schweitzer A, Zarza E, Nava P, Langenkamp J, Mandelberg E. EUROTROUGHParabolic trough collector developed for cost efficient solar power generation. In: 11th International Symposium on Concentrating Solar Power and Chemical Energy Technologies, Zurich, Switzerland, 2002Google Scholar
- 8.Herrmann U, Nava P. Performance of the SKAL-ET collector of the Andasol power plants. In: Proceedings of 14th International Solar PACES Symposium on Solar Thermal Concentrating Technologies, Las Vegas, USA, 2008Google Scholar
- 10.Lamba D K. A review on parabolic trough type solar collectors: innovation, applications and thermal energy storage. In: Proceedings of the National Conference on Trends and Advances in Mechanical Engineering, YMCA University of Science & Technology, Faridabad, Haryana, 2012Google Scholar
- 13.Forristall R. Heat transfer analysis and modeling of a parabolic trough solar receiver implemented in engineering equation solver. National Renewable Energy Lab., Golden, CO, USA, 2003Google Scholar
- 14.Gee RC, Hale MJ. Solargenix energy advanced parabolic trough development. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO., USA, 2005Google Scholar
- 15.Castañeda N, Vázquez J, Domingo M, Fernández A, León J. Sener parabolic trough collector design and testing. In: SolarPACES Congress, Spain, 2006Google Scholar
- 16.Relloso S, Castaneda N, Domingo M. New Senertough collector development in collaboration with key components suppliers. In: 14th International SolarPACES Symposium, Las Vegas, USA, 2008Google Scholar
- 22.Almeida Costa Oliveira F, Cruz Fernandes J, Badie J M, Granier B, Guerra Rosa L, Shohoji N. High meta-stability of tungsten subcarbide W2C formed from tungsten/carbon powder mixture during eruptive heating in a solar furnace. International Journal of Refractory Metals & Hard Materials, 2007, 25(1): 101–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Xu Y, Cui K, Liu D. The development of a software for solar radiation and its verification by the measurement results on the spot. Energy Technology (Weinheim), 2002, 23(6): 237–239Google Scholar