Renewable energy resources, policies and gaps in BRICS countries and the global impact

  • Lakshmi Pathak
  • Kavita ShahEmail author
Research Article


This paper presents comparative yet extensive analysis of existing non-conventional renewable resources, energy policies and gaps in BRICS countries. An intelligent transformation to green economy to maintain natural resources is noted. Brazil has stable energy policies and is the leading producer of biofuels following hydropower until 2014 but supported wind and solar power development by tendering specific tariffs for energy generation from solar and wind. Russia needs improvement in its legal and regulatory framework with more incentives in energy policies. China is improving upon wind and hydropower but it needs strong policy measures to put cap on increased CO2 emissions. India needs revision in energy policy and requires extra incentives and consumer specific energy policies for research-infrastructure and energy generation technologies. South Africa requires lessons to increase renewable energy and reduce coal mining. Moreover, BRICS countries need to redefine their energy policies based upon their existing geographical, economical, societal and environmental conditions which will help in shaping global energy policies and more financial stability. This paper recognizes the potential of BRICS to reshape the global system paralleled with minimizing CO2 emissions. The concerted role of BRICS needs to be recognized as the leading contributor of global renewable capacity where the developed world is geared and busy to address the environmental issues.


BRICS CO2 emissions energy policies renewable 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



The research in this paper was supported by the UGC (University Grants Commission, New Delhi) fellowship to LP.


  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Zaman K, Abdullah A, Khan A, Nasir M R M, Hamzah T A A T, Hussain S. Dynamic linkages among energy consumption, environment, health and wealth in BRICS countries: green growth key to Sustainable development. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 56: 1263–1271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    Manyari WV, de Carvalho O A Jr. Environmental considerations in energy planning for the Amazon region: downstream effects of dams. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(12): 6526–6534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Edkins M A, Marquard A, Winkler H. South Africa’s renewable energy policy roadmaps Final Report–June 2010–for the United Nations Environment Programme Research Project Enhancing information for renewable energy technology deployment in Brazil, China and South Africa. Cape Town: Energy Research Centre, University of Cape Town. 2010: 41Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Greenpeace. Laggards and leaders: the energy transition in BRICS countries. 2015, Scholar
  7. 7.
    EIA. International Energy Outlook. 2013, Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    Government of the Russian Federation. Energy Strategy of Russia for the Period up to 2030. 2009–11–13,
  11. 11.
    International Finance Corporation (IFC). Renewable Energy Policy in Russia: Waking the Green Giant. 2011,
  12. 12.
    Øverland I, Kjærnet H. Russian Renewable Energy: the Potential for International Cooperation. New York: Routledge, 2016Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kirpichnikova I, Sulamaa P. Renewable energy sources in Finland and Russia—a review. Baltic Sea Policy Briefing, 2013, 3: 1–45Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Safonov G, Stetsenko A, Tepeнтьeв A, Kozeltsev M, Dorina A, Safonova Y, Besedovskaya D. Country environmental legal framework—Russian Federation. 2015–01, Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Svalova V, Povarov K. Geothermal energy use in Russia. Country update for 2010–2015. In: Proceedings of World Geothermal Congress, Melbourne, Australia, 2015Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bhattacharya S C, Jana C. Renewable energy in India: historical developments and prospects. Energy, 2009, 34(8): 981–991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ministry of New and Renewable Energy, Government of India. MNRE: strategic plan for new and renewable energy sector for the period of 2011–17. 2011–02,
  18. 18.
    Lam P L, Shiu A. Efficiency and productivity of China’s thermal power generation. Review of Industrial Organization, 2004, 24(1): 73–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhao Z Y, Chen Y L, Chang R D. How to stimulate renewable energy power generation effectively?–China’s incentive approaches and lessons. Renewable Energy, 2016, 92: 147–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Walwyn D R, Brent A C. Renewable energy gathers steam in South Africa. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 41: 390–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Roelfsema M, Elzen M D, Hohne N, Hof A F, Braun N, Fekete H, Böttcher H, Brandsma R, Larkin J. Are major economies on track to achieve their pledges for 2020? An assessment of domestic climate and energy policies. Energy Policy, 2014, 67: 781–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sadorsky P. Renewable energy consumption, CO2 emissions and oil prices in the G7 countries. Energy Economics, 2009, 31(3): 456–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Aguirre M, Ibikunle G. Determinants of renewable energy growth: a global sample analysis. Energy Policy, 2014, 69: 374–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hallding K, Marie O, Aaron A, Vihma A, Marcus C, Mikael R. Together alone: BASIC countries and the climate change conundrum. Report Commissioned by the Nordic Council of Ministers, 2011Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cowan W N, Chang T, Inglesi-Lotz R, Gupta R. The nexus of electricity consumption, economic growth and CO2 emissions in the BRICS countries. Energy Policy, 2014, 66: 359–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wu L, Liu S, Liu D, Fang Z. Modelling and forecasting CO2 emissions in the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) countries using a novel multi-variable grey model. Energy Policy, 2015, 79:489–495Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jensen S, Skytte G K. Interactions between the power and green certificate markets. Energy Policy, 2002, 30(5): 425–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    DEA (Department of Environmental Affairs). Defining South Africa’s peak, plateau and cline greenhouse gas emissions trajectory. Explanatory note, Pretoria, South Africa, 2011Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    IRENA (International Renewable Energy Agency). Renewable Energy Benefits: Measuring the Economics. 2016,
  30. 30.
  31. 31.
    de Melo C A, Jannuzzi G M, Bajay S V. Nonconventional renewable energy governance in Brazil: lessons to learn from the German experience. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 61: 222–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pahuja N, Pandey N, Mandal K, Bandyopadhya C. GHG mitigation in India: an overview of the current policy landscape. 2014, Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    IRENA. Renewable energy prospects: China, RE map 2030 analysis. 2014–09,
  34. 34.
    Lo K. A critical review of China’s rapidly developing renewable energy and energy efficiency policies. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, 29: 508–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ministry of Power, Government of India. Hydropower, a sustainable, clean and green alternative. 2008,
  36. 36.
    Department of Energy, Republic of South Africa. State of Renewable Energy in South Africa. 2015,
  37. 37.
    Ministry of Power, Government of India. Energy Conservation Act. 2001,
  38. 38.
    National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), China. Report on the Implementation of the 2015 Plan for National Economic and Social Development and on the 2016 Draft Plan for National Economic and Social Development. Delivered at the Fourth Session of the Twelfth National People’s Congress on March 5, 2016,
  39. 39.
    Vasileva E, Viljainen S, Sulamaa P, Kuleshov D. RES support in Russia: impact on capacity and electricity market prices. Renewable Energy, 2015, 76: 82–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Zhang Z, Jin X, Yang Q, Zhang Y. An empirical study on the institutional factors of energy conservation and emissions reduction evidence from listed companies in China. Energy Policy, 2013, 57: 36–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Industrial Efficiency Policy Database. CN-9: energy efficiency appraisals for new large industrial projects. 2014,
  42. 42.
    National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), China. China’s policies and actions for addressing climate change. 2017–10Google Scholar
  43. 43.
  44. 44.
    REN21. Renewables 2016 global status report. 2016–06, Scholar
  45. 45.
    REN21. Renewables 2017 global status report. 2017, www.ren21. net/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/17-8399_GSR_2017_Full_Report_0621_Opt.pdfGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Environment and Sustainable DevelopmentBanaras Hindu UniversityVaranasiIndia

Personalised recommendations