Advertisement

Frontiers in Energy

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 411–425 | Cite as

Proliferation of district heating using local energy resources through strategic building-stock management: A case study in Fukushima, Japan

  • Yi Dou
  • Keijiro Okuoka
  • Minoru FujiiEmail author
  • Hiroki Tanikawa
  • Tsuyoshi Fujita
  • Takuya Togawa
  • Liang Dong
Research Article
  • 57 Downloads

Abstract

District heating systems using cogeneration technology and renewable resources are considered as an effective approach to resources conservation and reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, widespread aging and depopulation problems, as well as the popularization of energy-saving technologies in buildings, are estimated to greatly decrease energy consumption, leading to inefficiency in district heating and barriers to technology proliferation. From a long-term perspective, land use changes, especially the progression of compact city plans, have the potential to offset the decrement in energy consumption that maintains the efficiency of district heating systems. An integrated model is developed in this paper based on building cohort analysis to evaluate the economic feasibility and environmental impact of introducing district heating systems to a long-term compact city plan. As applied to a case in the Soma Region of Fukushima, Japan, potential migration from the suburbs to the central station districts is simulated, where district heating based on gas-fired cogeneration is expected to be introduced. The results indicate that guided migration to produce concentrated centers of population can substantially increase the heat demand density, which supports a wider application of district heating systems and better low-carbon performance. These results are further discussed in relation to technology innovation and related policies. It is concluded that policies related to urban land use planning and energy management should be integrated and quantitatively evaluated over the long-term with the aim of supporting urban low-carbon sustainable development.

Keywords

building stock compact city district heating energy use Fukushima 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the Low Carbon Technology Assessment Program of the Ministry of Environment of Japan, as well as the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund (Grant Nos. 2-1711 and 3-1709) of Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency.

References

  1. 1.
    IEA. CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion 2015. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2015Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Leung D Y C, Caramanna G, Maroto-Valer M M. An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, 39: 426–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Esteban M, Zhang Q, Utama A. Estimation of the energy storage requirement of a future 100% renewable energy system in Japan. Energy Policy, 2012, 47: 22–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ivner J, Broberg Viklund S. Effect of the use of industrial excess heat in district heating on greenhouse gas emissions: a systems perspective. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2015, 100(Suppl. C): 81–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baldvinsson I, Nakata T. A comparative exergy and exergoeconomic analysis of a residential heat supply system paradigm of Japan and local source based district heating system using SPECO (specific exergy cost) method. Energy, 2014, 74: 537–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sahlin J, Knutsson D, Ekvall T. Effects of planned expansion of waste incineration in the Swedish district heating systems. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2004, 41(4): 279–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Olsson L, Wetterlund E, Soderstrom M. Assessing the climate impact of district heating systems with combined heat and power production and industrial excess heat. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2015, 96: 31–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Luo X, Dong L, Dou Y, Li Y, Liu K, Ren J, Liang H, Mai X. Factor decomposition analysis and causal mechanism investigation on urban transport CO2 emissions: comparative study on Shanghai and Tokyo. Energy Policy, 2017, 107: 658–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    UNFCCC. Paris Agreement. Paris: Unite Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), 2015Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    MOEJ. Submission of Japan’s intended nationally determined contribution (INDC). 2015, https://doi.org/www.env.go.jp/en/earth/cc/2030indc.html Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wakiyama T, Zusman E, Monogan J E III. Can a low-carbon-energy transition be sustained in post-Fukushima Japan? Assessing the varying impacts of exogenous shocks. Energy Policy, 2014, 73: 654–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McLellan B C, Zhang Q, Utama N A, Farzaneh H, Ishihara K N. Analysis of Japan’s post-Fukushima energy strategy. Energy Strategy Reviews, 2013, 2(2): 190–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Van Berkel R, Fujita T, Hashimoto S, Geng Y. Industrial and urban symbiosis in Japan: analysis of the Eco-Town program 1997–2006. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009, 90(3): 1544–1556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Berkel R V, Fujita T, Hashimoto S, et al. Quantitative assessment of urban and industrial symbiosis in Kawasaki, Japan. Environmental Science & Technology, 2009, 43(5): 1271–1281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fujii M, Fujita T, Dong L, et al. Possibility of developing lowcarbon industries through urban symbiosis in Asian cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 114: 376–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dalla Rosa A, Boulter R, Church K, Svendsen S. District heating (DH) network design and operation toward a system-wide methodology for optimizing renewable energy solutions (SMORES) in Canada: a case study. Energy, 2012, 45(1): 960–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dalla Rosa A, Christensen J E. Low-energy district heating in energy-efficient building areas. Energy, 2011, 36(12): 6890–6899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tol H I, Svendsen S. Improving the dimensioning of piping networks and network layouts in low-energy district heating systems connected to low-energy buildings: a case study in Roskilde, Denmark. Energy, 2012, 38(1): 276–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Togawa T, Fujita T, Ashina S, et al. Design support framework for distributed energy system considering with regional characteristics. Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. G (Environmental Research), 2015, 71(6): II_139–II_149Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Togawa T, Fujita T, Fujii M, et al. Design method of resource circulation and energy system with considering spatial characteristics. Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. G (Environmental Research), 2014, 70(6): II_33–II_43Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rezaie B, Rosen M A. District heating and cooling: review of technology and potential enhancements. Applied Energy, 2012, 93: 2–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lund H, Werner S, Wiltshire R, Svendsen S, Thorsen J E, Hvelplund F, Mathiesen B V. 4th generation district heating (4GDH) integrating smart thermal grids into future sustainable energy systems. Energy, 2014, 68: 1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ziemele J, Gravelsins A, Blumberga A, Blumberga D. Combining energy efficiency at source and at consumer to reach 4th generation district heating: economic and system dynamics analysis. Energy, 2017, 137: 595–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dodds P E, Staffell I, Hawkes A D, Li F, Grünewald P, McDowall W, Ekins P. Hydrogen and fuel cell technologies for heating: a review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(5): 2065–2083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chow T T, Chan A L S, Song C L. Building-mix optimization in district-cooling system implementation. Applied Energy, 2004, 77(1): 1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Best R E, Flager F, Lepech M D. Modeling and optimization of building mix and energy supply technology for urban districts. Applied Energy, 2015, 159: 161–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Persson U, Werner S. Heat distribution and the future competitiveness of district heating. Applied Energy, 2011, 88(3): 568–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dou Y, Togawa T, Dong L, et al. Innovative planning and evaluation system for district heating using waste heat considering spatial configuration: a case in Fukushima, Japan. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2018, 128(Suppl. C): 406–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Togawa T, Fujita T, Taniguchi T, et al. An evaluation approach for regional energy system planning considering long-term land use transition scenarios. Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. G (Environmental Research), 2013, 69(6): II_401–II_412Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dou Y, Ohnishi S, Fujii M, et al. Feasibility of developing heat exchange network between incineration facilities and industries in cities: case of Tokyo Metropolitan Area. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 170: 548–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Liang H W, Dong L, Luo X, et al. Balancing regional industrial development: analysis on regional disparity of China’s industrial emissions and policy implications. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 126: 223–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chertow M R. Industrial symbiosis: literature and taxonomy. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 2000, 25(1): 313–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dong H J, Ohnishi S, Fujita T, Geng Y, Fujii M, Dong L. Achieving carbon emission reduction through industrial & urban symbiosis: a case of Kawasaki. Energy, 2014, 64: 277–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dong L, Liang H, Zhang L, Liu Z, Gao Z, Hu M. Highlighting regional eco-industrial development: life cycle benefits of an urban industrial symbiosis and implications in China. Ecological Modelling, 2017, 361(Suppl. C): 164–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Li H, Dong L, Ren J Z. Industrial symbiosis as a countermeasure for resource dependent city: a case study of Guiyang, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 107: 252–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sun L, Li H, Dong L, et al. Eco-benefits assessment on urban industrial symbiosis based on material flows analysis and emergy evaluation approach: a case of Liuzhou city, China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2017, 119: 78–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Tanikawa H, Onishi A, Takahira Y, et al. Four-dimensional mapping of building material stock and energy consumption for stock-type and low carbon society: a case study of buildings in Nagoya city. Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Japan, 2010, 6(2): 92–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tanikawa H, Hashimoto S. Urban stock over time: spatial material stock analysis using 4D-GIS. Building Research and Information, 2009, 37(5–6): 483–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Dou Y, Fujii M, Fujita T, et al. Potential of waste heat exchange considering industrial location changes: a case of Shinchi-Soma Region in Fukushima, Japan. Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, 2017, 73(6): II_353–II_363Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    National Institute of Population and Social Security Research. Regional Population Projections for Japan: 2010–2040. Health, Labour and Welfare Statistics Association, Tokyo, 2013Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gomi K, Ashina S, Fujita T, et al. Development of a methodology for regional future scenarios considering interaction of industry and population and application in Soma Region in Fukushima Prefecture. Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. G (Environmental Research), 2015, 71(6): II_151–II_162Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Togawa T, Fujita T, Dong L, et al. Feasibility assessment of the use of power plant-sourced waste heat for plant factory heating considering spatial configuration. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2014, 81: 60–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES). CO2 Technology Assessment Promotion Commissioned Program by Ministry of Environment, Japan. Report for FY2017. Tsukuba: National Institute for Environmental Studies, 2017Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Komatsu Y. Some theoretical studies on making a life table of buildings. Journal of Architecture, Planning and Environmental Engineering, 1992, 439: 91–99Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Nielsen S, Moller B. GIS based analysis of future district heating potential in Denmark. Energy, 2013, 57: 458–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Japan Heat Supply Business Association (JHSBA). Manual of heat supply business. Tokyo: Japan Heat Supply Business Association (JHSBA), 2016Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ministry of Environment, Japan (MOEJ). Emission factor and calculation guide for the calculation, reporting, and disclosure systems. Tokyo: MOEJ, 2016Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Hoshino Y, Nagata Y, Hamanii J. Re-prediction of energy demand and supply toward 2030. SERC Discussion Paper. Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry, 2015 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Cabeza L F, Barreneche C, Miró L, et al. Low carbon and low embodied energy materials in buildings: a review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013, 23: 536–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Dziugaite-Tumeniene R, Jankauskas V. Energy use in the life cycle of a low-energy building. Environmental Engineering, 2011, 1–3: 740–746Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Loorbach D. Transition management for sustainable development: a prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions, 2010, 23(1): 161–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Lund H. Renewable Energy Systems: A Smart Energy Systems Approach to the Choice and Modeling of 100% Renewable Solutions, 2nd ed. Salt Lake City: Academic Press, 2014Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yi Dou
    • 1
    • 2
  • Keijiro Okuoka
    • 2
  • Minoru Fujii
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hiroki Tanikawa
    • 2
  • Tsuyoshi Fujita
    • 1
  • Takuya Togawa
    • 3
  • Liang Dong
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Center for Social and Environmental Systems ResearchNational Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES)Tsukuba, IbarakiJapan
  2. 2.Graduate School of Environmental StudiesNagoya UniversityNagoyaJapan
  3. 3.Fukushima BranchNational Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES)FukushimaJapan
  4. 4.CMLLeiden UniversityLeidenthe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations