Advertisement

Frontiers in Energy

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 1–8 | Cite as

Expulsive force in the development of CO2 sequestration: application of SC-CO2 jet in oil and gas extraction

  • Haizhu WangEmail author
  • Gensheng Li
  • Zhonghou Shen
  • Zhenguo He
  • Qingling Liu
  • Bin Zhu
  • Youwen Wang
  • Meng Wang
Research Article
  • 29 Downloads

Abstract

With the rapid development of global economy, an increasing amount of attention has been paid to the emission of greenhouse gases, especially CO2. In recent years, dominated by the governments around the world, several significant projects of CO2 sequestration have been conducted. However, due to the huge investment and poor economic effects, the sustainability of those projects is not satisfactory. Supercritical CO2 (SC-CO2) has prominent advantages in well drilling, fracturing, displacement, storage, plug and scale removal within tubing and casing, which could bring considerable economic benefits along with CO2 sequestration. In this paper, based on physicochemical properties of SC-CO2 fluid, a detailed analysis of technical advantages of SC-CO2 applied in oil and gas development is illustrated. Furthermore, the implementation processes of SC-CO2 are also proposed. For the first time, a recycling process is presented in which oil and gas are extracted and the CO2 generated could be restored underground, thus an integrated technology system is formed. Considering the recent interests in the development of enhancing hydrocarbon recoveries and CO2 sequestration, this approach provides a promising technique that can achieve these two goals simultaneously.

Keywords

CO2 sequestration SC-CO2 jet well drilling fracturing oil and gas 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is supported financially by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51521063, and U1562212); The Key Project of Chinese National Programs for Fundamental Research and Development (973 program) (No. 2014CB239203); The Science Foundation of China University of Petroleum, Beijing (No. 2462015BJB01).

References

  1. 1.
    Han B X. Supercritical Fluid Science and Technology. Beijing: China Petrochemical Press. 2005 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baike B. Carbon dioxide. 2016-05, http://baike.baidu.com/view/17816.htmGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vats S K, Kumar S, Ahuja P S. CO2 sequestration in plants: lesson from divergent strategies. Photosynthetica, 2011, 49(4): 481–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kang S M. Carbon dioxide storage capacity of Barnett Shale. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Texas: A&M University, 2011Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Honari A, Bijeljic B, Johns M L, May E F. Enhanced gas recovery with CO2 sequestration: the effect of medium heterogeneity on the dispersion of supercritical CO2–CH4. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2015, 39: 39–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Prabu V, Mallick N. Coalbed methane with CO2 sequestration: an emerging clean coal technology in India. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 50: 229–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Weniger P, Kalkreuth W, Busch A, Krooss B M. High-pressure methane and carbon dioxide sorption on coal and shale samples from the Parana Basin, Brazil. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2010, 84(3–4): 190–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kolle J J, Marvin M H. Jet assisted drilling with supercritical carbon dioxide. Technical Report of Tempress Technologies Inc. Houston, T X, USA, 2000Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang H Z, Li G S, Shen Z H, Tian S C, Sun B J, He Z G, Lu P Q. Experiment on rock breaking with supercritical carbon dioxide jet. Journal of Petroleum Science Engineering, 2015, 127: 305–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shen Z H. Feasibility analysis on shale gas exploitation with supercritical carbon dioxide. In: The Second Conference of Shale Gas Exploitation Technology in China, Beijing, 2010Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Heller R, Zoback M. Adsorption of methane and carbon dioxide on gas shale and pure mineral samples. Journal of Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources, 2014, 8: 14–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang Q Q, Zhang D F, Wang H H, Jiang WP, Wu X P, Yang J, Huo P. Influence of CO2 exposure on high-pressure methane and CO2 adsorption on various rank coals: implications for CO2 sequestration in coal seams. Energy & Fuels, 2015, 29(6): 3785–3795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kollé J J. Coiled tubing drilling with supercritical carbon dioxide. Technical Report 6347675 B1. 2002Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shen Z H, Wang H Z, Li G S. Feasibility analysis of coiled tubing drilling with supercritical carbon dioxide. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2010, 37(6): 743–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kolle J J. Coiled-tubing drilling with supercritical carbon dioxide. In: The 2000 SPE/CIM Inter-national Conference on Horizontal Well Technology held in Calgary. Alberta, Canada, 2000Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang Z M. Feature research of supercritical carbon dioxide drilling fluid. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Qingdao: China University of Petroleum, 2008 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang H, Li G, Shen Z. A feasibility analysis on shale gas exploitation with supercritical carbon dioxide. Energy Source Part A, 2012, 34(15): 1426–1435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gupta A. Feasibility of supercritical carbon dioxide as a drilling fluid for deep underbalanced drilling operations. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Louisiana: Louisiana State University, 2006Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang H, Shen Z, Li G. The development and prospect of supercritical carbon dioxide drilling. Petroleum Science and Technology, 2012, 30(16): 1670–1676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Li G S, Wang H Z, Shen Z H, Huang Z W, Tian S Z, Shi H Z, Song X Z. A drilling method of ultra-short radius horizontal well. Technical Report ZL201010565816.0. 2010Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Li X, Feng Z J, Han G. Derek E, Chris M, Demian S. Hydraulic fracturing in shale with H2O, CO2 and N2. In: The 49th US Rock Mechanics/ Geomechanics Symposium. San Francisco, CA, USA, 2015Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wang H Z, Shen Z H, Li G S, Tian S Z, Cheng Y X. Shale gas exploitation with supercritical CO2 technology. Engineering and Science, 2012, 10(4): 13–17Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bielicki J M, Middleton R S, Levine J S, Stauffer P. An alternative pathway for stimulating regional deployment of carbon dioxide capture and storage. Energy Procedia, 2014, 63: 7215–7224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gandossi L. An overview of hydraulic fracturing and other formation stimulation technologies for shale gas production. Scientific and Policy Report. The Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, 2013Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Middleton R S, Carey J W, Currier R P, Hyman J D, Kang Q J, Karra S, Jiménez-Martínez J Q, PorterML, Viswanathan H S. Shale gas and non-aqueous fracturing fluids: opportunities and challenges for supercritical CO2. Applied Energy, 2015, 147: 500–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Davies R J, Mathias S A, Moss J, Hustoft S, Newport L. Hydraulic fractures: how far can they go. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2012, 37(1): 1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gupta S. Unconventional fracturing fluids: what, where and why. Technical workshops for the Hydraulic Fracturing Study. Tomball Technology Center, Baker Hughes, Arlington, USA, 2011Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Li Z M, Liu W, Li S Y, Li J, Li B F. Research on the effect of supercritical carbon dioxide on the properties of super heavy oil. Advanced Materials Research, 2012, 347: 1689–1695Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cheng Y X, Li G S, Wang H Z, Shen Z, Tian S, Fan X. Pressure boosting effect in perforation cavity during supercritical carbon dioxide jet fracturing. Atomization and Sprays, 2013, 23(5): 463–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Li G S, Wang H Z, Shen Z H, Tian S Z, Huang Z W, Shi H Z, Song X Z. Supercritical CO2 jet fracturing with coiled tubing. Technical Report ZL201110078618.6. 2011Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Busch A, Alles S, Gensterblum Y, Prinz D, Dewhurst D, Raven M, Stanjek H, Krooss B. Carbon dioxide storage potential of shales. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2008, 2(3): 297–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dai Z X, Middleton R, Viswanathan H, Fessenden-Rahn J, Bauman J, Pawar R J, Lee S Y, McPherson B. An integrated framework for optimizing CO2 sequestration and enhancedoil recovery. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 2014, 1(1): 49–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Liu H, Valocchi A J, Werth C, Kang Q, Oostrom M. Pore-scale simulation of liquid CO2 displacement of water using a two-phase lattice Boltzmann model. Advances in Water Resources, 2014, 73: 144–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Busch A, Gensterblum Y, Krooss B M, Siemons N. Investigation of high-pressureselective adsorption/desorption behaviour of CO2 and CH4 on coals: an experimental study. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2006, 66(1–2): 53–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mastalerz M, Drobniak A, Rupp J, Shaffer N. Characterization of Indiana’s coal resource: availability of the reserves, physical and chemical properties of the coal, and the present and potential uses. Final Report to the Center for Coal Technology Research, Indiana Geological Survey Open-File Study 04-02.2004Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sun B J, Zhang Y L, Du Q J, Shen Z H. Property evaluation of CO2 adsorption and desorption on shale. Journal of China University of Petroleum, 2013, 37(5): 95–99 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Li G S, Wang H Z, Shen Z H, Tian S Z, Huang Z W, Cheng Y X. Application investigations and prospects of supercritical carbon dioxide jet in petroleum engineering. Journal of China University of Petroleum, 2013, 37(5): 76–80 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Edlmann K, Haszeldine S, Mc Dermott C I. Experimental investigation into the sealing capability of naturally fractured shale caprocks to supercritical carbon dioxide flow. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2013, 70(7): 3393–3409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Arthur J D, Coughlin B J, Bohm B K. Summary of environmental issues, mitigation strategies, and regulatory challenges associated with shale gas development in the United States and applicability to development and operations in Canada. Technical Report SPE- 138977-MS. 2010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Schumann J, Vossoughi S. Unconventional gas resources in the USA. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. Potsdam, Germany, 2012: 301–306Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Soliman M Y, Daal J A, East L E. Impact of fracturing and fracturing techniques on productivity of unconventional formations. Technical Report SPE-150949-MS. 2012Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Anderson R L, Ratcliffe I, Greenwell H C, Williams P A, Cliffe S, Coveney P V. Clay swelling—a challenge in the oilfield. Earth- Science Reviews, 2010, 98(3–4): 201–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Al Otaibi F M, Khaldi M H, Funk J J, Shen S W, Al-Qahtani J. Supercritical CO2 interaction with Montmorilloniteclay. In: SPE EOR Conference at Oil and Gas West Asia. Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2012Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    El Hajj H, Odi U, Gupta A. Carbonate reservoir interaction with supercritical carbon dioxide. In: IPTC 2013: International Petroleum Technology Conference. Muscat, Oman, 2013Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wang G Q, Zhou C F, Lv X P, Chen T Y, Tian D B, Liu M Z. Applications of horizontal wells rotating sand-washing process with CT. Oil Field Equipment, 2011, 40(5): 70–73 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Xu Z G, Wang B, Chen X, Liu T, Song L. Development and application of new well flushing for casing protection. Oil Field Equipment, 2011, 40(1): 84–87 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Li G S, Wang H Z, Tian S Z, Huang Z W, Shi H Z, Song X Z. Sand cleaning and plug removing with supercritical CO2 jet by coiled tubing. Technical Report ZL201110359313.2. 2011Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Haizhu Wang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Gensheng Li
    • 1
  • Zhonghou Shen
    • 1
  • Zhenguo He
    • 1
  • Qingling Liu
    • 1
  • Bin Zhu
    • 1
  • Youwen Wang
    • 1
  • Meng Wang
    • 1
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and EngineeringChina University of PetroleumBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations