Frontiers in Energy

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 260–267 | Cite as

Energy shift: decline of easy oil and restructuring of geo-politics

  • Oliver R. InderwildiEmail author
  • David A. King
Research Article


This paper critically assesses the geopolitical and geo-economic impact of novel fuel resources on both resource exporters and importers. Presently, very strong political and economic forces drive the utilisation of domestic, unconventional oil and gas recovery in the West as these enhance energy security and ease balance of payment issues. The additional capacity generated by this trend has, supported by other effects such as Saudi Arabia’s decision to maintain current production, triggered a significant reduction of oil prices. Consequently, it is now oil exporters that struggle with the balance of payment issues and often these countries base their fiscal budget completely on fossil fuel revenues. In fact, these unconventional resources help turn the tide while oil exporters are now politically significantly weakened due to the increased energy sufficiency of the West. The catch is that the extraction of unconventional types of oil has many environmental implications. So, internalising the environmental externalities have to be considered. This paper, therefore, assesses, next to geopolitics and geo-economics, the environmental implications of this trend.


energy security climatic change geo-economics geopolitics unconventional resources macroeconomics 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Campbell C J, Laherrère J. The end of cheap oil. Scientific American, 1998, 278(3): 78–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Inderwildi O R, King D A. Energy, Transport and the Environment: Addressing the Sustainable Mobility Paradigm. London: Springer Heidelberg, 2012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fantazzini D, Höök M, Angelantoni A. Global oil risks in the early 21st century. Energy Policy, 2011, 39(12): 7865–7873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Van Moerkerk M. Crijns-Graus W. A comparison of oil supply risks in EU, US, Japan, China and India under different climate scenarios. Energy Policy, 2016, 88: 148–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Owen N A, Inderwildi O R, King D A. The status of conventional world oil reserves–hype or cause for concern? Energy Policy, 2010, 38(8): 4743–4749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Campbell C J. Campbell’s Atlas of Oil & Gas Depletion. Springer, 2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Murray J, King D A. Climate policy: oil’s tipping point has passed. Nature, 2012, 481: 433–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Arezki R, Blanchard O. Seven questions about the recent oil price slump. 2014-12-22, Scholar
  9. 9.
    Emily Cadman. Oil price slump shot in the arm for global economy, says IMF. 2014-12-22, Scholar
  10. 10.
    Statistics Division of the International Energy Agency. Crude Oil Production. 2015-03, Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fratzscher M, Schneider D, van Robays I. Oil prices, exchange rates and asset prices. ECB Working Paper 1689, 2014Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Czech National Bank. Inflation report II. 2011, Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sachs G. Panel: the new oil order. 2015-02-24, Scholar
  14. 14.
    McGlade C, Ekins P. The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2°C. Nature, 2015, 517(7533): 187–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hall C, Klitgaard K. Energy and the Wealth of Nations— Understanding the Biophysical Economy. NewYork: Springer, 2012Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Murphy D J, Hall C A S. Year in review—EROI or energy return on (energy) invested. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2010, 1185(1): 102–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bergerson J, Keith D. Life cycle assessment of oil sands technologies. Alberta Energy Futures Project. Institute for Sustainable Energy, Environment, and Economy (ISEE), University of Calgary, 2006Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hall C A S. Energy return on investment. 2013-05-09, Investment_R1_012913.pdfGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Inderwildi O R. Siegrist F, Dickson R D, Hagan A J. The feedstock curve: novel fuel resources, environmental conservation, the force of economics and the renewed east–west power struggle. Applied Petrochemical Research, 2014, 4(1): 157–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Grubb M. Emissions trading: cap and trade finds new energy. Nature, 2012, 491: 666–667Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Inderwildi O R, King D A. Quo vadis biofuels. Energy & Environmental Science, 2009, 2(4): 343–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Inderwildi O R, Jenkins S J, King D A. Mechanistic studies of hydrocarbon combustion and synthesis on noble metals. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2008, 47(28): 5253–5255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chapman I. The end of peak oil? Why this topic is still relevant despite recent denials. Energy Policy, 2014, 64: 93–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Campbell C J. The anomalous age of easy energy. In: Inderwildi O R, King D A, eds. Energy, Transport, & the Environment. Springer, 2012Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lutz C, Lehr U, Wiebe K S. Economic effects of peak oil. Energy Policy, 2012, 48: 829–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Smith School of Enterprise and the EnvironmentUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations