Evaluating estimated sediment delivery by Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) and Sediment Delivery Distributed (SEDD) in the Talar Watershed, Iran
The performance of the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) as the most widely used soil erosion model is a challenging issue. Accordingly, the objective of this study is investigating the estimated sediment delivery by the RUSLE method and Sediment Delivery Distributed (SEDD) model. To this end, the Talar watershed in Iran was selected as the study area. Further, 700 paired sediment-discharge measurements at Valikbon and Shirgah-Talar hydrometric stations between the years 1991 and 2011 were collected and used in sediment rating curves. Nine procedures were investigated to produce the required RUSLE layers. The estimated soil erosion by RUSLE was evaluated using sediment rating curve data by two methods including least squares and quantile regression. The average annual suspended sediment load was calculated for each sub-watershed of the study area using the SEDD model. Afterwards, a sediment rating curve was estimated by least squares and quantile regression methods using paired discharge-sediment data. The average annual suspended sediment load values were calculated for two hydrometric stations and were further evaluated by the SEDD model. The results indicated that the first considered procedure, which utilized 15-min rainfall measurements for the rainfall factor (R), and the classification method of SENTINEL-2 MSI image for the cover management factor (C), offered the best results in producing RUSLE layers. Furthermore, the results revealed the advantages of utilizing satellite images in producing cover management layer, which is required in the RUSLE method.
KeywordsRevised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) sediment rating curve quantile regression Geographic Information System (GIS)
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Dregne H E (1992). Erosion and soil productivity in Asia. J Soil Water Conserv, 47: 8–13Google Scholar
- Fathizad H, Karimi H, Alibakhshi S M (2014). The estimation of erosion and sediment by using the RUSLE model and RS and GIS techniques (case study: Arid and semi-arid regions of Doviraj, Ilam province, Iran). Int J Agric Crop Sci, 7: 303Google Scholar
- Fournier F (1960) Climate and erosion: the relationship between soil erosion by water and atmospheric precipitation. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Paris: University of FranceGoogle Scholar
- Iikhchi A A, Hajabbassi M, Jalalian A (2003). Effects of converting range to dry-farming land on runoff and soil loss and quality in Dorahan, Chaharmahal & Bakhtiari Province. JWSS-Isfahan University of Technology, 6(4): 103–115Google Scholar
- Koenker R (2012) Quantreg: Quantile Regression. R package version 4.98Google Scholar
- Minacapilli M, Santoro M (2003) Calibrating the SEDD model for Sicilian ungauged basins. Erosion Prediction in Ungauged Basins: Integrating Methods and Techniques, 279: 151Google Scholar
- Morgan R P C, Nearing M (2016). Handbook of Erosion Modelling. London: John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar
- Renard KG, Foster GR, Weesies G, McCool D, Yoder D (1997) Predicting Soil Erosion by Water: a Guide to Conservation Planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE). Washington D C: US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Riley S J, DeGloria S D, Elliot R (1999). A terrain ruggedness index that quantifies topographic heterogeneity. Intermt J Sci, 5: 23–27Google Scholar
- Van der Knijff J, Jones R, Montanarella L (2000). Soil erosion risk assessment in Europe. European Soil Bureau, European Commission Belgium.Google Scholar
- Wischmeier W H, Smith D D (1978). Predicting rainfall erosion losses—a guide to conservation planning. USDA, Science and Education AdministrationGoogle Scholar