Advertisement

Frontiers of Earth Science

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 495–509 | Cite as

Detection of short-term urban land use changes by combining SAR time series images and spectral angle mapping

  • Zhuokun Pan
  • Yueming HuEmail author
  • Guangxing Wang
Research Article
  • 50 Downloads

Abstract

Rapid urban sprawl and re-construction of old towns have been leading to great changes of land use in cities of China. To witness short-term urban land use changes, rapid or real time remote sensing images and effective detection methods are required. With the availability of short repeat cycle, relatively high spatial resolution, and weather-independent Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) remotely sensed data, detection of short-term urban land use changes becomes possible. This paper adopts newly released Sentinel-1 SAR data for urban change detection in Tianhe District of Guangzhou City in Southern China, where dramatic urban redevelopment practices have been taking place in past years. An integrative method that combines the SAR time series data and a spectral angle mapping (SAM) was developed and applied to detect the short-term land use changes. Linear trend transformations of the SAR time series data were first conducted to reveal patterns of substantial changes. Spectral mixture analysis was then conducted to extract temporal endmembers to reflect the land development patterns based on the SAR backscattering intensities over time. Moreover, SAM was applied to extract the information of significant increase and decrease patterns. The results of validation and method comparison showed a significant capability of both the proposed method and the SAR time series images for detecting the short-term urban land use changes. The method received an overall accuracy of 78%, being more accurate than that using a bi-temporal image change detection method. The results revealed land use conversions due to the removal of old buildings and their replacement by new construction. This implies that SAR time series data reflects the spatiotemporal evolution of urban constructed areas within a short time period and this study provided the potential for detecting changes that requires continuously short-term capability, and could be potential in other landscapes.

Keywords

Sentinel-1 SAR time series images urban land use change detection temporal endmember spectral angle mapping 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Key Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. U1301253), Guangdong Provincial Science and Technology Project (Nos. 2017A050501031 and 2017A040406022), Guangzhou Science and Technology Projects (Nos. 201807010048 and 201804020034), and the International Postdoctoral Exchange Fellowship Program 2017 (No. 20170029). The authors would like to express their thanks to European Space Agency for providing Sentinel-1 SAR data as well as ESA-SNAP software in conducting research, our colleagues Haiyan Deng and Li Zhao for their assistance in collecting field validation, and processing images, and the colleagues from the Guangzhou Urban Renewal Bureau for their good suggestions. We also would like to thank the editors and anonymous reviewers for their instructive comments.

References

  1. Aiazzi B, Bovolo F, Bruzzone L, Garzelli A, Pirrone D, Zoppetti C (2018). Change detection in multitemporal images through singleand multi-scale approaches. In: Moser G, Zerubia J, eds. Mathematical Models for Remote Sensing Image Processing. Signals and Communication Technology. Cham: SpringerGoogle Scholar
  2. Atto A M, Trouve E, Berthoumieu Y, Mercier G (2013). Multidate divergence matrices for the analysis of SAR image time series. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 51(4): 1922–1938Google Scholar
  3. Ban Y, Jacob A, Gamba P (2015). Spaceborne SAR data for global urban mapping at 30 m resolution using a robust urban extractor. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens, 103: 28–37Google Scholar
  4. Ban Y, Yousif O (2016). Change detection techniques: a review. In: Ban Y, eds. Multitemporal Remote Sensing. Remote Sensing and Digital Image Processing, vol 20. Cham: SpringerGoogle Scholar
  5. Ban Y, Yousif O A (2012). Multitemporal spaceborne SAR data for urban change detection in China. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens, 5(4): 1087–1094Google Scholar
  6. Conradsen K, Nielsen A A, Skriver H (2016). Determining the points of change in time series of polarimetric SAR data. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 54(5): 3007–3024Google Scholar
  7. Esch T, Thiel M, Schenk A, Roth A, Muller A D S, Dech S (2010). Delineation of urban footprints from TerraSAR-X data by analyzing speckle characteristics and intensity information. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 48(2): 905–916Google Scholar
  8. Europe-Space-Agency (2013). Sentinel-1 User HandbookGoogle Scholar
  9. Foody G M (2010). Assessing the accuracy of land cover change with imperfect ground reference data. Remote Sens Environ, 114(10): 2271–2285Google Scholar
  10. Frate D F, Pacifici F, Solimini D (2008). Monitoring urban land cover in Rome, Italy, and its changes by single-polarization multitemporal SAR images. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens, 1(2): 87–97Google Scholar
  11. Fugate D, Tarnavsky E, Stow D (2010). A survey of the evolution of remote sensing imaging systems and urban remote sensing applications. In: Rashed T, Jürgens C, eds. Remote Sensing of Urban and Suburban Areas. Springer ScienceGoogle Scholar
  12. Gamba P, Dell’Acqua F (2016). Change detection in urban areas: spatial and temporal scales. In: Ban Y, ed. Multitemporal Remote Sensing. Remote Sensing and Digital Image Processing, vol 20. Cham: SpringerGoogle Scholar
  13. Gong M, Zhao J, Liu J, Miao Q, Jiao L (2016). Change detection in synthetic aperture radar images based on deep neural networks. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst, 27(1): 125–138Google Scholar
  14. Grey WMF, Luckman A J, Holland D (2003). Mapping urban change in the UK using satellite radar interferometry. Remote Sens Environ, 87 (1): 16–22Google Scholar
  15. Gruninger J, Ratkowski A J, Hoke M L (2004). The Sequential Maximum Angle Convex Cone (SMACC) Endmember Model. Paper presented at the Proceedings SPIE, Algorithms for Multispectral and Hyper-spectral and Ultraspectral Imagery, Orlando FL, USAGoogle Scholar
  16. Hecheltjen A, Thonfeld F, Menz G (2014). Recent advances in remote sensing change detection–A review. In: Manakos I, Braun M, eds. Land Use and Land Cover Mapping in Europe: Practices and Trends. Springer Science, 145–178Google Scholar
  17. Hussain M, Chen D, Cheng A, Wei H, Stanley D (2013). Change detection from remotely sensed images: from pixel-based to objectbased approaches. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens, 80: 91–106Google Scholar
  18. Kleynhans W, Salmon B P, Olivier J C (2015). Detecting settlement expansion in South Africa using a hyper-temporal SAR change detection approach. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf, 42: 142–149Google Scholar
  19. Kruse F A, Lefkoff A B, Boardman J B, Heidebrecht K B, Shapiro A T, Barloon P J, Goetz A F H (1993). The spectral image processing system (SIPS)–interactive visualization and analysis of imaging spectrometer data. Remote Sens Environ, 44(2–3): 145–163Google Scholar
  20. Lopes A, Touzi R, Nezry E (1990). Adaptive speckle filters and scene heterogeneity. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 28(6): 992–1000Google Scholar
  21. Markus B, Antje T, Karsten S, Stefan H (2017). Change classification in SAR time series: a functional approach. Proceeding of the SPIE 10428, Remote Sensing, Earth Resources and Environmental Remote Sensing/GIS Applications, Oct 2017. Warsaw, PolandGoogle Scholar
  22. Milillo P, Riel B, Minchew B, Yun S H, Simons M, Lundgren P (2016). On the synergistic use of SAR constellations’ data exploitation for earth science and natural hazard response. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens, 9(3): 1095–1100Google Scholar
  23. Muro J, Canty M, Conradsen K, Hüttich C, Nielsen A, Skriver H, Remy F, Strauch A, Thonfeld F, Menz G (2016). Short-term change detection in wetlands using Sentinel-1 time series. Remote Sens, 8 (10): 795Google Scholar
  24. Nagler T, Rott H, Hetzenecker M, Wuite J, Potin P (2015). The Sentinel-1 mission: new opportunities for ice sheet observations. Remote Sens, 7(7): 9371–9389Google Scholar
  25. Pan Z, Huang J, Wang F (2013). Multi range spectral feature fitting for hyperspectral imagery in extracting oilseed rape planting area. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf, 25: 21–29Google Scholar
  26. Patino J E, Duque J C (2013). A review of regional science applications of satellite remote sensing in urban settings. Comput Environ Urban Syst, 37: 1–17Google Scholar
  27. Perrou T, Garioud A, Parcharidis I (2018). Use of Sentinel-1 imagery for flood management in a reservoir-regulated river basin. Front Earth Sci, 12(3): 506–520Google Scholar
  28. Plaza A, Martín G, Plaza J, Zortea M, Sánchez S (2011). Recent developments in endmember extraction and spectral unmixing. Optical Remote Sensing, 3: 235–267Google Scholar
  29. Qi Z, Yeh A G, Li X, Xian S, Zhang X (2015). Monthly short-term detection of land development using RADARSAT-2 polarimetric SAR imagery. Remote Sens Environ, 164: 179–196Google Scholar
  30. Quartulli M, Datcu M (2004). Stochastic geometrical modeling for builtup area understanding from a single SAR intensity image with meter resolution. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens, 42(9): 1996–2003Google Scholar
  31. Savitzky A, Golay M J E (1964). Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplifiedleast squares procedures. Anal Chem, 36(8): 1627–1639Google Scholar
  32. Small C (2012). Spatiotemporal dimensionality and time-space characterization of multitemporal imagery. Remote Sens Environ, 124: 793–809Google Scholar
  33. Torres R, Snoeij P, Geudtner D, Bibby D, Davidson M, Attema E, Potin P (2012). GMES Sentinel-1 mission. Remote Sens Environ, 120: 9–24Google Scholar
  34. Wang G, Weng Q (2013). Remote Sensing of Natural Resources. CRC Press, 1–580Google Scholar
  35. Watanabe M, Thapa R B, Ohsumi T, Fujiwara H, Yonezawa C, Tomii N, Suzuki S (2016). Detection of damaged urban areas using interferometric SAR coherence change with PALSAR-2. Earth Planets Space, 68(1): 131–142Google Scholar
  36. Yun S H, Hudnut K, Owen S, Webb F, Simons M, Sacco P, Gurrola E, Manipon G, Liang C, Fielding E, Milillo P, Hua H, Coletta A (2015). Rapid damage mapping for the 2015 Mw 7.8 Gorkha earthquake using synthetic aperture radar data from COSMO–SkyMed and ALOS-2 satellites. Seismol Res Lett, 86(6): 1549–1556Google Scholar
  37. Zhang H, Li J, Wang T, Lin H, Zheng Z, Li Y, Lu Y (2018b). A manifold learning approach to urban land cover classification with optical and radar data. Landsc Urban Plan, 172: 11–24Google Scholar
  38. Zhang H, Lin H, Li Y, Zhang Y, Fang C (2016). Mapping urban impervious surface with dual-polarimetric SAR data: an improved method. Landsc Urban Plan, 151: 55–63Google Scholar
  39. Zhang H, Lin H, Wang Y (2018a). A new scheme for urban impervious surface classification from SAR images. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens, 139: 103–118Google Scholar
  40. Zhang H, Xu R (2018). Exploring the optimal integration levels between SAR and optical data for better urban land cover mapping in the Pearl River Delta. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 64: 87–95Google Scholar
  41. Zhang Y, Zhang H, Lin H (2014). Improving the impervious surface estimation with combined use of optical and SAR remote sensing images. Remote Sens Environ, 141: 155–167Google Scholar
  42. Zhou Z (2014). Towards collaborative approach? Investigating the regeneration of urban village in Guangzhou, China. Habitat Int, 44: 297–305Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Natural Resources and EnvironmentSouth China Agricultural UniversityGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Construction Land TransformationMinistry of Land and ResourcesGuangzhouChina
  3. 3.Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Land Use and ConsolidationGuangzhouChina
  4. 4.Guangdong Provincial Land Information Engineering Research CenterGuangzhouChina
  5. 5.College of Agriculture and Animal HusbandryQinghai UniversityXiningChina
  6. 6.Department of GeographySouthern Illinois University at CarbondaleCarbondaleUSA

Personalised recommendations