Advertisement

Frontiers of Earth Science

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 1–17 | Cite as

Spatial-temporal variations of natural suitability of human settlement environment in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area—A case study in Fengjie County, China

  • Jieqiong Luo
  • Tinggang Zhou
  • Peijun DuEmail author
  • Zhigang Xu
Research Article

Abstract

With rapid environmental degeneration and socio-economic development, the human settlement environment (HSE) has experienced dramatic changes and attracted attention from different communities. Consequently, the spatial-temporal evaluation of natural suitability of the human settlement environment (NSHSE) has become essential for understanding the patterns and dynamics of HSE, and for coordinating sustainable development among regional populations, resources, and environments. This study aims to explore the spatial-temporal evolution of NSHSE patterns in 1997, 2005, and 2009 in Fengjie County near the Three Gorges Reservoir Area (TGRA). A spatially weighted NSHSE model was established by integrating multi-source data (e.g., census data, meteorological data, remote sensing images, DEM data, and GIS data) into one framework, where the Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) linear regression model was applied to calculate the weights of indices in the NSHSE model. Results show that the trend of natural suitability has been first downward and then upward, which is evidenced by the disparity of NSHSE existing in the south, north, and central areas of Fengjie County. Results also reveal clustered NSHSE patterns for all 30 townships. Meanwhile, NSHSE has significant influence on population distribution, and 71.49% of the total population is living in moderate and high suitable districts.

Keywords

natural suitability of human settlement environment ordinary least squares model global and local spatial autocorrelation analyses Three Gorges Reservoir Area (TGRA) Fengjie County 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the Research Funding for the Continuous Work of Three Gorges Project sponsored by the Executive Office of Three Gorges Project Construction Committee (No. 0001792015CB50002). The authors would like to thank all the organizations for sharing data. We also wish to thank the three anonymous reviewers and Dr. Yanhua Xie of University of Wisconsin-Madison for their constructive comments.

References

  1. Anselin L (1995). Local indicators of spatial association—LISA. Geogr Anal, 27(2): 93–115Google Scholar
  2. Arnell N W, van Vuuren D P, Isaac M (2011). The implications of climate policy for the impacts of climate change on global water resources. Glob Environ Change, 21(2): 592–603Google Scholar
  3. Burton I (1987). Report on reports: our common future: the world commission on environment and development. Environ: Sci Policy Sustain Dev, 29(5): 25–29Google Scholar
  4. Charoenkit S, Kumar S (2014). Environmental sustainability assessment tools for low carbon and climate resilient low income housing settlements. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 38: 509–525Google Scholar
  5. Chongqing Municipal Bureau of Statistics and National Bureau of Statistics Survey Office in Chongqing (2016). Chongqing Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  6. Doxiadĺes K A (1977). Action for Human Settlements. Athens Center of EkisticsGoogle Scholar
  7. Dubovyk O, Sliuzas R, Flacke J (2011). Spatio-temporal modelling of informal settlement development in Sancaktepe district, Istanbul, Turkey. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens, 66(2): 235–246Google Scholar
  8. Emmanuel R (2005). Thermal comfort implications of urbanization in a warm-humid city: the Colombo Metropolitan Region (CMR), Sri Lanka. Build Environ, 40(12): 1591–1601Google Scholar
  9. Feng Z, Yang Y, Zhang D, Tang Y (2009). Natural environment suitability for human settlements in China based on GIS. J Geogr Sci, 19(4): 437–446Google Scholar
  10. Foley J A, DeFries R, Asner G P, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter S R, Stuart Chapin F, Coe M T, Daily G C, Gibbs H K, Helkowski J H, Holloway T, Howard E A, Kucharik C J, Monfreda C, Patz J A, Colin Prentice I, Ramankutty N, Snyder P K (2005). Global consequences of land use. Science, 309(5734): 570–574Google Scholar
  11. Ford A, Clarke K C, Raines G (2009). Modeling settlement patterns of the late classic Maya civilization with bayesian methods and geographic information systems. Ann Assoc Am Geogr, 99(3): 496–520Google Scholar
  12. Fu B J,Wu B F, Lu Y H, Xu Z H, Cao J H, Dong Niu, Yang G S, Zhou Y M (2010). Three Gorges Project: efforts and challenges for the environment. Prog Phys Geogr, 34(6): 741–754Google Scholar
  13. Giraud J (2009). The evolution of settlement patterns in the eastern Oman from the Neolithic to the Early Bronze Age (6000–2000BC). C R Geosci, 341(8–9): 739–749Google Scholar
  14. Godard X (2013). Comparisons of urban transport sustainability: lessons from West and North Africa. Res Transp Econ, 40(1): 96–103Google Scholar
  15. Han G F, Yang Y C, Yan S Y (2013). Vegetation activity trend and its relationship with climate change in the Three Gorges Area, China. Adv Meteorol, 2013(2013): 235378Google Scholar
  16. Hassan R M, Robert S, Neville A (2005). Ecosystems and human wellbeing: current state and trends: findings of the Condition and Trends Working Group. Washington D. C.: Island PressGoogle Scholar
  17. He J, Tian Y Z, Gao Y H, Ming X H, Chen Z J, Yang S Q (2010). Assessment of climate suitability for human settlement environment in mountain areas of Chongqing. Journal of Southwest University, 32 (9): 100–106 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  18. Höppe P (1999). The physiological equivalent temperature–A universal index for the biometeorological assessment of the thermal environment. Int J Biometeorol, 43(2): 71–75Google Scholar
  19. Horikoshi T, Kagami K (1991). Influence of insolation and topography on the landscape of settlement in the Nyu Ravine, Nara. Energy Build, 15(3): 385–389Google Scholar
  20. Huang S L, Wong J H, Chen T C (1998). A framework of indicator system for measuring Taipei’s urban sustainability. Landscape urban plan, 42(1): 15–27Google Scholar
  21. Hutchinson M F, Xu T B (2013). ANUSPLIN Version 4.4 User Guide. Canberra: The Australian National University, Fenner School of Environment and SocietyGoogle Scholar
  22. Jenerette G D, Harlan S L, Brazel A, Jones N, Larsen L, Stefanov W L (2007). Regional relationships between surface temperature, vegetation, and human settlement in a rapidly urbanizing ecosystem. Landsc Ecol, 22(3): 353–365Google Scholar
  23. Jiao M (2014). A Comprehensive Assessment Report: Climatic Effects of Three Gorges Project. Beijing: China Meteorological Press (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  24. Krüger T, Held F, Hoechstetter S, Goldberg V, Geyer T, Kurbjuhn C (2013). A new heat sensitivity index for settlement areas. Urban Climate, 6: 63–81Google Scholar
  25. Li G, Dovers S (2011). Integrated assessment of climate change impacts on urban settlements: lessons from five Australian cases. In: Climate Change Adaptation in Developed Nations. Springer Netherlands: 289–302Google Scholar
  26. Luo J, Du P, Samat A, Xia J, Che M, Xue Z (2017). Spatiotemporal pattern of PM2.5 concentrations in Mainland China and analysis of its influencing factors using geographically weighted regression. Sci Rep, 7: 40607Google Scholar
  27. Marans RW (2015). Quality of urban life & environmental sustainability studies: future linkage opportunities. Habitat Int, 45: 47–52Google Scholar
  28. Matzarakis A, Mayer H, Iziomon M G (1999). Applications of a universal thermal index: physiological equivalent temperature. Int J Biometeorol, 43(2): 76–84Google Scholar
  29. Miranda J D, Armas C, Padilla F M, Pugnaire F I (2011). Climatic change and rainfall patterns: effects on semi-arid plant communities of the Iberian Southeast. J Arid Environ, 75(12): 1302–1309Google Scholar
  30. Mitchell A (2005). The ESRI Guide to GIS Analysis (Volume 2). ESRI PressGoogle Scholar
  31. Ouzounis G K, Syrris V, Pesaresi M (2013). Multiscale quality assessment of global human settlement layer scenes against reference data using statistical learning. Pattern Recognit Lett, 34(14): 1636–1647Google Scholar
  32. Owen K K, Wong D W (2013). An approach to differentiate informal settlements using spectral, texture, geomorphology and road accessibility metrics. Appl Geogr, 38: 107–118Google Scholar
  33. Pugh C (2000). Squatter settlements: their sustainability, architectural contributions, and socio-economic roles. Cities, 17(5): 325–337Google Scholar
  34. Rojas E (1989). Human settlements of the Eastern Caribbean: development problems and policy options. Cities, 6(3): 243–258Google Scholar
  35. Ruda G (1998). Rural buildings and environment. Landscape urban plan, 41(2): 93–97Google Scholar
  36. Schnaiberg J, Riera J, Turner M G, Voss P R (2002). Explaining human settlement patterns in a recreational lake district: Vilas County, Wisconsin, USA. Environ Manage, 30(1): 24–34Google Scholar
  37. Shen L, Kyllo J M, Guo X (2013). An integrated model based on a hierarchical indices system for monitoring and evaluating urban sustainability. Sustainability, 5(2): 524–559Google Scholar
  38. Silbernagel J, Martin S R, GaleMR, Chen J (1997). Prehistoric, historic, and present settlement patterns related to ecological hierarchy in the Eastern Upper Peninsula of Michigan, USA. Landsc Ecol, 12(4): 223–240Google Scholar
  39. Siple P A, Passel C F (1945). Measurements of dry atmospheric cooling in subfreezing temperatures. P Am Philos Soc, 89(1): 177–199Google Scholar
  40. State Environmental Protection Administration of China (SEPAC) (2006). Environment Protection Industry Criterion of P.R. China: Technical Criterion for Eco-Environmental Status Evaluation. Beijing: China Environmental Science PressGoogle Scholar
  41. Thom E C (1959). The discomfort index. Weatherwise, 12(2): 57–61Google Scholar
  42. Three Gorges Project Ecology and Environment Monitoring System Information Management Center (TGPEEMSIMC) (2009). Report of Land Resource Change and its Ecological Effects. State Council Three Gorges Project Construction Committee Executive Office, Beijing (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  43. Tian G, Qiao Z, Zhang Y (2012). The investigation of relationship between rural settlement density, size, spatial distribution and its geophysical parameters of China using Landsat TM images. Ecol Modell, 231: 25–36Google Scholar
  44. Trincsi K, Phamb T H, Turner S (2014). Mapping mountain diversity: ethnic minorities and land use land cover change in Vietnam’s borderlands. Land Use Policy, 41: 484–497Google Scholar
  45. Tseliou A, Tsiros I X, Lykoudis S, Nikolopoulou M (2010). An evaluation of three biometeorological indices for human thermal comfort in urban outdoor areas under real climatic conditions. Build Environ, 45(5): 1346–1352Google Scholar
  46. Van Kamp I, Leidelmeijer K, Marsman G, Hollander A D (2003). Urban environmental quality and human well-being: towards a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts; a literature study. Landscape Urban Plan, 65(1–2): 5–18Google Scholar
  47. Wang Q, Yuan X, Willison J H, Zhang Y, Liu H (2014). Diversity and above-ground biomass patterns of vascular flora induced by flooding in the drawdown area of China’s Three Gorges Reservoir. PLoS One, 9(6): e100889Google Scholar
  48. Wei W, Shi P, Zhou J, Feng H, Wang X, Wang X (2013). Environmental suitability evaluation for human settlements in an arid inland river basin: a case study of the Shiyang River Basin. J Geogr Sci, 23(2): 331–343Google Scholar
  49. Wen Z, Wu S, Chen J, Lü M (2017). NDVI indicated long-term interannual changes in vegetation activities and their responses to climatic and anthropogenic factors in the Three Gorges Reservoir Region, China. Sci Total Environ, 574: 947–959Google Scholar
  50. Xu Y, Sun J, Zhang J, Xu Y, Zhang M, Liao X (2012). Combining AHP with GIS in synthetic evaluation of environmental suitability for living in China’s 35 major cities. Int J Geogr Inf Sci, 26(9): 1603–1623Google Scholar
  51. Xu Z, Li Q (2014). Integrating the empirical models of benchmark land price and GIS technology for sustainability analysis of urban residential development. Habitat Int, 44: 79–92Google Scholar
  52. Zebardast E (2009). The housing domain of quality of life and life satisfaction in the spontaneous settlements on the Tehran metropo- litan fringe. Soc Indic Res, 90(2): 307–324Google Scholar
  53. Zeilhofer P, Topanotti V P (2008). GIS and ordination techniques for evaluation of environmental impacts in informal settlements: a case study from Cuiaba, central Brazil. Appl Geogr, 28(1): 1–15Google Scholar
  54. Zhang C, Luo L, Xu W, Ledwith V (2008). Use of local Moran’s I and GIS to identify pollution hotspots of Pb in urban soils of Galway, Ireland. Sci Total Environ, 398(1–3): 212–221Google Scholar
  55. Zhang X, Wu Y, Shen L (2011). An evaluation framework for the sustainability of urban land use: a study of capital cities and municipalities in China. Habitat Int, 35(1): 141–149Google Scholar
  56. Zhao M, Tang G, Shi W, et al. (2002). A GIS-based research on the distribution of rural settlements in Yulin of northern Shaanxi. J Geogr Sci, 12(2): 171–176Google Scholar
  57. Zhou G, He Y, Tang C, Yu T, Xiao G, Zhong T (2013). Dynamic mechanism and present situation of rural settlement evolution in China. J Geogr Sci, 23(3): 513–524Google Scholar
  58. Zhou Y, Zhang L, Fensholt R, Wang K, Vitkovskaya I, Tian F (2015). Climate contributions to vegetation variations in central Asian Drylands: pre-and post-USSR collapse. Remote Sens, 7(3): 2449–2470Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jieqiong Luo
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Tinggang Zhou
    • 4
    • 5
  • Peijun Du
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Zhigang Xu
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Key Laboratory for Satellite Mapping Technology and Applications of State Administration of Surveying, Mapping and Geoinformation of ChinaNanjing UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science and TechnologyNanjing UniversityNanjingChina
  3. 3.Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and ApplicationNanjingChina
  4. 4.School of Geographical SciencesSouthwest UniversityChongqingChina
  5. 5.Key Laboratory of Eco-environments in Three Gorges Reservoir Region (Ministry of Education)ChongqingChina

Personalised recommendations