Frontiers of Earth Science

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 63–71 | Cite as

Atmospheric deposition of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Shanghai: the spatio-temporal variation and source identification

  • Chen Cheng
  • Chunjuan Bi
  • Dongqi WangEmail author
  • Zhongjie Yu
  • Zhenlou Chen
Research Article


This study investigated the dry and wet deposition fluxes of atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Shanghai, China. The flux sources were traced based on composition and spatio-temporal variation. The results show that wet deposition concentrations of PAHs ranged from 0.07 to 0.67 mg·L–1 and were correlated with temperature (P<0.05). Dry deposition of PAHs concentrations ranged from 3.60–92.15 mg·L–1 and were higher in winter and spring than in summer and autumn. The annual PAH average fluxes were 0.631 mg·m–2·d–1 and 4.06 mg·m–2·d–1 for wet and dry deposition, respectively. The highest wet deposition of PAH fluxes was observed in summer, while dry deposition fluxes were higher in winter and spring. Atmospheric PAHs were deposited as dry deposition in spring and winter, yet wet deposition was the dominant pathway during summer. Total atmospheric PAH fluxes were higher in the northern areas than in the southern areas of Shanghai, and were also observed to be higher in winter and spring. Annual deposition of atmospheric PAHs was about 10.8 t in across all of Shanghai. Wet deposition of PAHs was primarily composed of two, three, or four rings, while dry deposition of PAHs was composed of four, five, or six rings. The atmospheric PAHs, composed of four, five, or six rings, primarily existed in the form of particulates. Coal combustion and vehicle emissions were the dominant sources of PAH in the observed area of downtown Shanghai. In suburban areas, industrial pollution, from sources such as coke oven, incinerator, and oil fired power plant, was as significant as vehicle emissions in contributing to the deposition of PAHs.


PAHs dry and wet deposition temporal and spatial variation Shanghai 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



This work was jointly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41271472, 41473094 and 41671467), Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai Municipality (Grant Nos.14ZR1412100 and 12ZR1409000). Authors also acknowledge J. Lv and J. Han for their assistance with field work and in the laboratory.

Supplementary material

11707_2016_613_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.5 mb)
Atmospheric deposition of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Shanghai: the spatio-temporal variation and source identification


  1. Bae S Y, Yi S M, Kim Y P (2002). Temporal and spatial variations of the particle size distribution of PAHs and their dry deposition fluxes in Korea. Atmos Environ, 36(35): 5491–5500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barakat A O (2002). PAHs and petroleum markers in the atmospheric environment of Alexandria City, Egypt. Water Air Soil Pollut, 139(1–4): 289–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Birgül A, Tasdemir Y, Cindoruk S S (2011). Atmospheric wet and dry deposition of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) determined using a modified sampler. Atmos Res, 101(1–2): 341–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bureau of Shanghai Municipal Statistics (2015). Statistical Yearbook of Shanghai 2014. Concise statistical yearbook of Shanghai, 2015Google Scholar
  5. Ciganek M, Adamec V, Janosek J, Machala M (2004). A combined chemical and bioassay analysis of traffic emitted polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Sci Total Environ, 334–335: 141–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Daane L L, Harjono I, Zvlstra G J, Häggblom M M (2001). Isolation and characterization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria associated with the rhizosphere of salt marsh plants. Appl Environ Microbiol, 67(6): 2683–2691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dallarosa J B, Teixeira E C, Pires M, Fachel J (2005). Study of the profile of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in atmospheric particles (PM10) using multivariate methods. Atmos Environ, 39(35): 6587–6596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dickhut R M, Gustafson K E (1995). Atmospheric inputs of selected polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and polychlorinated biphenyls to southern Chesapeake Bay. Mar Pollut Bull, 30(6): 385–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dunbar J C, Lin C I, Vergucht I, Wong J, Durant J L (2001). Estimating the contributions of mobile sources of PAH to urban air using realtime PAH monitoring. Sci Total Environ, 279(1–3): 1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fang G C, Chang K F, Lu C, Bai H (2004). Estimation of PAHs dry deposition and BaP toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) study at Urban, Industry Park and rural sampling sites in central Taiwan, Taichung. Chemosphere, 55(6): 787–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guor C F, Cheng N C, Kuan F C (2008). Ambient air aerosols, total polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) for day and night time in the traffic areas of Central Taiwan. Toxicological & Environmental Chemistry, 2008, 70(70): 15–27Google Scholar
  12. Ho K F, Lee S C (2002). Identification of atmospheric volatile organic compounds (VOCs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and carbonyl compounds in HongKong. Sci Total Environ, 289(1–3): 145–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jiang Y, Hou X, Zhuang G, Li J, Wang Q, Zhang R, Lin Y (2009). The sources and seasonal variations of organic compounds in PM2.5 in Beijing and Shanghai. J Atmos Chem, 62(3): 175–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Khalili N R, Scheff P A, Holsen TM (1995). PAH source fingerprints for coke ovens, diesel and, gasoline engines, highway tunnels, and wood combustion emissions. Atmos Environ, 29(4): 533–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li G, Zhou M, Chen C, Wang H, Wang Q, Lou S, Qiao L P, Tang X B, Li L, Huang H Y, Chen M H, Huang C, Zhang G F (2014). Characteristics of particulate matters and its chemical compositions during the dust episodes in Shanghai in spring, 2011. Environ Sci, 35 (5): 1644–1653Google Scholar
  16. Li J, Liu X, Zhang G, Li X D (2010). Particle deposition fluxes of BDE-209, PAHs, DDTs, and chlordane in the Pearl River Delta, South China. Sci Total Environ, 408(17): 3664–3670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li X, Li P, Yan L, Chen J, Cheng T, Xu S (2011). Characterization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in fog–rain events. J Environ Monit, 13(11): 2988–2993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Liang J, Ma G, Fang H, Chen L, Christie P (2011). Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon concentrations in urban soils representing different land use categories in Shanghai. Environmental Earth Sciences, 62(1): 33–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lim M K C H, Ayoko G A, Morawska L (2005). Characterization of elemental and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon compositions of the urban air in Brisbane. Atmos Environ, 39(3): 463–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu Y, Chen L, Zhao J, Wei Y, Pan Z, Meng X Z, Huang Q, Li W (2010). Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the surface soil of Shanghai, China: concentrations, distribution and sources. Org Geochem, 41 (4): 355–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Luo X J, She J C, Mai B X, Sheng G Y, Fu J M, Zeng E Y (2008). Distribution, source apportionment and transport of PAHs in sediments from the Pearl River Delta and the Northern South China Sea. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol, 55(1): 11–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McVeety B D, Hites R A (1988). Atmospheric deposition of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons to water surfaces: a mass balance approach. Atmos Environ, 22(3): 511–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nadal M, Schuhmacher M, Domingo J L (2004). Levels of PAHs in soil and vegetation samples from Tarragona County, Spain. Environ Pollut, 132(1): 1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nielsen T (1996). Traffic contribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the center of a large city. Atmos Environ, 30(20): 3481–3490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Odabasi M, Cetin E, Sofuoglu A (2006). Determination of octanol–air partition coefficients and supercooled liquid vapor pressures of PAHs as a function of temperature: application to gas–particle partitioning in an urban atmosphere. Atmos Environ, 40(34): 6615–6625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ollivon D, Blanchoud H, Motelay-Massei A, Garban B (2002). Atmospheric deposition of PAHs to an urban site, Pairs, France. Atmos Environ, 36(17): 2891–2900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ozaki N, Nitta K, Fukushima T (2006). Dispersion and dry and wet deposition of PAHs in an atmospheric environment. Water Science & Technology A Journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research, 53(2): 215–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Park J S, Wade T L, Sweet S T (2002). Atmospheric deposition of PAHs, PCBs, and organochlorine pesticides to Corpus Christi Bay, Texas. Atmos Environ, 36(10): 1707–1720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ren N Q, Que M X, Li Y F, Liu Y, Wan X, Xu D, Sverko E, Ma J (2007). Polychlorinated biphenyls in Chinese surface soils. Environ Sci Technol, 41(11): 3871–3876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tasdemir Y, Holsen T M (2005). Measurement of particle phase dry deposition fluxes of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) with a water surface sampler. Atmos Environ, 39(10): 1845–1854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang X Y, Li Q B, Luo Y M, Ding Q, Xi L M, Ma J M, Li Y, Liu Y P, Cheng C L (2010). Characteristics and sources of atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Shanghai, China. Environ Monit Assess, 165(1–4): 295–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wild S R, Jones K C (1995). Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in United Kingdom Environment: a preliminary source inventory and budget. Environ Pollut, 88(1): 91–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Xu S, Liu W, Tao S (2006). Emission of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in China. Environ Sci Technol, 40(3): 702–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yunker MB, Macdonald RW, Vingarzan R, Mitchell R H, Goyette D, Sylvestre S (2002). PAHs in the Fraser River basin: a critical appraisal of PAH ratios as indicators of PAH source and composition. Org Geochem, 33(4): 489–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhang W S, Zhang C, Wan D, Yue D, Ye Y, Wang X (2008). Source diagnostics of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in urban road runoff, dust, rain and canopy through fall. Environ Pollut, 153(3): 594–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chen Cheng
    • 1
    • 2
  • Chunjuan Bi
    • 1
  • Dongqi Wang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Zhongjie Yu
    • 3
  • Zhenlou Chen
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Geographic SciencesEast China Normal UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Shanghai Environment Monitoring CenterShanghaiChina
  3. 3.Department of Geology and Planetary ScienceUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations