Trace projection transformation: a new method for measurement of debris flow surface velocity fields
- 44 Downloads
Spatiotemporal variation of velocity is important for debris flow dynamics. This paper presents a new method, the trace projection transformation, for accurate, non-contact measurement of a debris-flow surface velocity field based on a combination of dense optical flow and perspective projection transformation. The algorithm for interpreting and processing is implemented in C ++ and realized in Visual Studio 2012. The method allows quantitative analysis of flow motion through videos from various angles (camera positioned at the opposite direction of fluid motion). It yields the spatiotemporal distribution of surface velocity field at pixel level and thus provides a quantitative description of the surface processes. The trace projection transformation is superior to conventional measurement methods in that it obtains the full surface velocity field by computing the optical flow of all pixels. The result achieves a 90% accuracy of when comparing with the observed values. As a case study, the method is applied to the quantitative analysis of surface velocity field of a specific debris flow.
Keywordsdebris flow surface velocity field spatiotemporal variation dense optical flow perspective projection transformation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bouguet J Y (2001). Pyramidal implementation of the affine Lucas kanade feature tracker description of the algorithm. Intel Corporation, 5Google Scholar
- Cui P (1992). Study on conditions and mechanisms of debris flow initiation by means of experiment. Chin Sci Bull, 37: 759–763Google Scholar
- Cui P, Zhu Y Y, Chen J (2007). Relationships between antecedent rainfall and debris flows in Jiangjia ravine, China. In: Cheng-lung Chen, Jon J. Major, editors. Debris-flow hazards mitigationmechanics, prediction, and assessment. Rotterdam: MillpressGoogle Scholar
- Genevois R, Galgaro A, Tecca P R (2001). Image analysis for debris flow properties estimation. Phys Chem Earth, Part C Sol-terr Planet Sci, 26(9): 623–631Google Scholar
- Hu K, Hu C, Li Y, Cui P (2011a). Characteristics and mechanism of debris-flow surges at Jiangjia ravine. In: 5th International Conference on Debris-Flow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction and Assessment. Rome: Casa Editrice Università La Sapienza, 211–217Google Scholar
- Kouamé D, Girault JM, Remenieras J P, Chemla J P, LethiecqM(2003). High resolution processing techniques for ultrasound doppler velocimetry in the presence of colored noise. Part II: multiplephase pipe-flow velocity measurement. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control, 50(3): 267–278Google Scholar
- Takahashi T (1978). Mechanical characteristics of debris flow. J Hydraul Div, 104: 1153–1169Google Scholar
- Tang J B, Hu K H, Zhou G D, Chen H Y, Zhu X H, Ma C (2013). Debris flow impact pressure signal processing by the wavelet analysis. Journal of Sichuan University: (Engineering Science Edition), 45: 8–13 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Wang G, Wu Q J, Sun G (2008). Quasi-perspective projection with applications to 3D factorization from uncalibrated image sequences. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2008. IEEE, 1–8Google Scholar
- Wei F Q, Hu K H, Cui P, Chen J, He Y P (2002). Characteristics and origing of debris flow of Jiangjiagou valiey blocking. J Soil Water Conserv, 16: 71–75 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Ying X, Hu Z, Zha H (2006). Fisheye lenses calibration using straightline spherical perspective projection constraint. In: Narayanan P J, Nayar S K, Shum H Y, eds. Computer Vision–ACCV. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 61–70Google Scholar