Frontiers of Earth Science

, Volume 6, Issue 4, pp 445–452 | Cite as

Spatial disparities of regional forest land change based on ESDA and GIS at the county level in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei area

Research Article


Forest land is the essential and important natural resource that provides strong support for human survival and development. Research on forest land changes at the county level about its characteristics, rules, and spatial patterns is, therefore, important for regional resource protection and the sustainable development of the social economy. In this study we selected the GIS and Geoda software package to explore the spatial disparities of forest land changes at the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei area county level, based on the global and local spatial autocorrelation analyses of exploratory spatial data. The results show that: 1) during 1985–2000, the global spatial autocorrelation of forest land change is significant in the study area. The global Moran’s I value is 0.3122 for the entire time period and indicates significant positive spatial correlation (p < 0.05). Moran’s I value of forest land change decreases from 0.3084 at the time stage I to 0.3024 at the time stage II; 2) the spatial clustering characteristics of forest land changes appear on the whole in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei area. Moran’s I value decreases from the time stage I to time stage II, which means that trend of spatial clustering of forest land change is weakened in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei area; 3) the grid map of the local Moran’s I for each county reflects local spatial homogeneity of forest land change, which means that spatial clustering about regions of high value and low value is especially significant. The regions with “High-High” correlation are mainly located in the north hilly area. However, the regions with “Low-Low” correlation were distributed in the middle of the study area. Therefore, protection strategies and concrete measures should be put in place for each regional cluster in the study area.


land use change forest land spatial autocorrelation ESDA GIS Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei area 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anselin L (1988). Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic PublishersGoogle Scholar
  2. Anselin L (1995). Local indicators of spatial association. Geogr Anal, 27 (2): 93–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anselin L, Sridharan S, Gholston S (2007). Using exploratory spatial data analysis to leverage social indicator databases: the discovery of interesting patterns. Soc Indic Res, 82(2): 287–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cliff A D, Ord J K (1981). Spatial Processes. London: PionGoogle Scholar
  5. Ertur C, Koch W (2006). Regional disparities in the European Union and the enlargement process: an exploratory spatial data analysis, 1995–2000. Annals of regional science, 40(4): 723–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Geary R (1954). The contiguity ratio and statistical mapping. The Incorporated Statistician, (3): 115–145Google Scholar
  7. Getis A, Ord J K (1992). The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geogr Anal, 24(3): 189–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Getis A, Ord J K (1996). Local spatial statistics: an overview. In: Lonley P, Batty M, eds. Spatial Analysis: Modeling in a GIS Environment. Cambridge: Geoinformation InternationalGoogle Scholar
  9. Guo B, Ren Z Y, Gao M X (2010). Space differentiation research of land intensive use based on ESDA-GIS taking Shaanxi as example. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 35(4): 61–64 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  10. Haining R, Wise S, Ma J (1998). Exploratory spatial data analysis in a geographic information system environment. Statistician, 47(3): 457–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ma X D, Ma R H, Xu J G (2004). Spatial structure of cities and towns with ESDA-GIS framework. Acta Geogr Sin, 59(6): 1048–1057 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  12. Moran P A P (1950). Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika, 37(1–2): 17–23Google Scholar
  13. Tu J, Xia Z G (2008). Examining spatially varying relationships between land use and water quality using geographically weighted regression I: model design and evaluation. Sci Total Environ, 407(1): 358–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tu W, Tedder S, Tian J (2012). An exploratory spatial data analysis of low birth weight prevalence in Georgia. Appl Geogr, 32(2): 195–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Vitousek P M, Mooney H A, Lubchenko J (1997). Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science, 277(5325): 494–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Xie H L (2008). Regional eco-risk analysis of based on landscape structure and spatial statistics. Acta Ecol Sin, 28(10): 5020–5026 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  17. Xie H L (2010). Analyzing regional agricultural economic inequalities in Poyang lake ring based on ESDA method. Agricultural Modernization Research, 31(3): 299–303 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  18. Xie H L, Kung C C, Zhang Y T, Li X B (2012). Simulation of regionally ecological land based on a cellular automation model: a case study of Beijing, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 9(8): 2986–3001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Xie H L, Liu L M, Li B, Zhang X S (2006). Spatial autocorrelation analysis of multi-scale land-use changes: a case study in Ongniud Banner, Inner Mongolia. Acta Geogr Sin, 61(4): 389–400 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  20. Ye X Y, Wu L (2011). Analyzing the dynamics of homicide patterns in Chicago: ESDA and spatial panel approaches. Appl Geogr, 31(2): 800–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Poyang Lake Eco-economicsJiangxi University of Finance and EconomicsNanchangChina
  2. 2.Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources ResearchChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations