Spatial disparities of regional forest land change based on ESDA and GIS at the county level in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei area
Forest land is the essential and important natural resource that provides strong support for human survival and development. Research on forest land changes at the county level about its characteristics, rules, and spatial patterns is, therefore, important for regional resource protection and the sustainable development of the social economy. In this study we selected the GIS and Geoda software package to explore the spatial disparities of forest land changes at the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei area county level, based on the global and local spatial autocorrelation analyses of exploratory spatial data. The results show that: 1) during 1985–2000, the global spatial autocorrelation of forest land change is significant in the study area. The global Moran’s I value is 0.3122 for the entire time period and indicates significant positive spatial correlation (p < 0.05). Moran’s I value of forest land change decreases from 0.3084 at the time stage I to 0.3024 at the time stage II; 2) the spatial clustering characteristics of forest land changes appear on the whole in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei area. Moran’s I value decreases from the time stage I to time stage II, which means that trend of spatial clustering of forest land change is weakened in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei area; 3) the grid map of the local Moran’s I for each county reflects local spatial homogeneity of forest land change, which means that spatial clustering about regions of high value and low value is especially significant. The regions with “High-High” correlation are mainly located in the north hilly area. However, the regions with “Low-Low” correlation were distributed in the middle of the study area. Therefore, protection strategies and concrete measures should be put in place for each regional cluster in the study area.
Keywordsland use change forest land spatial autocorrelation ESDA GIS Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei area
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Anselin L (1988). Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic PublishersGoogle Scholar
- Cliff A D, Ord J K (1981). Spatial Processes. London: PionGoogle Scholar
- Geary R (1954). The contiguity ratio and statistical mapping. The Incorporated Statistician, (3): 115–145Google Scholar
- Getis A, Ord J K (1996). Local spatial statistics: an overview. In: Lonley P, Batty M, eds. Spatial Analysis: Modeling in a GIS Environment. Cambridge: Geoinformation InternationalGoogle Scholar
- Guo B, Ren Z Y, Gao M X (2010). Space differentiation research of land intensive use based on ESDA-GIS taking Shaanxi as example. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 35(4): 61–64 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Ma X D, Ma R H, Xu J G (2004). Spatial structure of cities and towns with ESDA-GIS framework. Acta Geogr Sin, 59(6): 1048–1057 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Moran P A P (1950). Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika, 37(1–2): 17–23Google Scholar
- Xie H L (2008). Regional eco-risk analysis of based on landscape structure and spatial statistics. Acta Ecol Sin, 28(10): 5020–5026 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Xie H L (2010). Analyzing regional agricultural economic inequalities in Poyang lake ring based on ESDA method. Agricultural Modernization Research, 31(3): 299–303 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- Xie H L, Liu L M, Li B, Zhang X S (2006). Spatial autocorrelation analysis of multi-scale land-use changes: a case study in Ongniud Banner, Inner Mongolia. Acta Geogr Sin, 61(4): 389–400 (in Chinese)Google Scholar