Combined analysis of land cover change and NDVI trends in the Northern Eurasian grain belt
We present an approach to regional environmental monitoring in the Northern Eurasian grain belt combining time series analysis of MODIS normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) data over the period 2001-2008 and land cover change (LCC) analysis of the 2001 and 2008 MODIS Global Land Cover product (MCD12Q1). NDVI trends were overwhelmingly negative across the grain belt with statistically significant (p⩽0.05) positive trends covering only 1% of the land surface. LCC was dominated by transitions between three classes; cropland, grassland, and a mixed cropland/natural vegetation mosaic. Combining our analyses of NDVI trends and LCC, we found a pattern of agricultural abandonment (cropland to grassland) in the southern range of the grain belt coinciding with statistically significant (p⩽0.05) negative NDVI trends and likely driven by regional drought. In the northern range of the grain belt we found an opposite tendency toward agricultural intensification; in this case, represented by LCC from cropland mosaic to pure cropland, and also associated with statistically significant (p⩽0.05) negative NDVI trends. Relatively small clusters of statistically significant (p⩽0.05) positive NDVI trends corresponding with both localized land abandonment and localized agricultural intensification show that land use decision making is not uniform across the region. Land surface change in the Northern Eurasian grain belt is part of a larger pattern of land cover land use change (LCLUC) in Eastern Europe, Russia, and former territories of the Soviet Union following realignment of socialist land tenure and agricultural markets. Here, we show that a combined analysis of LCC and NDVI trends provides a more complete picture of the complexities of LCLUC in the Northern Eurasian grain belt, involving both broader climatic forcing, and narrower anthropogenic impacts, than might be obtained from either analysis alone.
Keywordsland cover change MODIS NDVI Northern Eurasian grain belt Kazakhstan Russia time series analysis Ukraine
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Akhmadieva Z K, Groisman P Y (2008). General assessment of climate change in Kazakhstan since 1990. Hydrometeorology and Environment, 2: 46–53 (in Russian)Google Scholar
- Angelstam P, Boresjö-Bronge L, Mikusiński G, Sporrong U, Wästfelt A (2003). Assessing village authenticity with satellite images: a method to identify intact cultural landscapes in Europe. Ambio, 32(8): 594–604Google Scholar
- Ioffe G, Nefedova T, Zaslavsky I (2004). From spatial continuity to fragmentation: the case of Russian farming. Ann Assoc Am Geogr, 94(4): 913–943Google Scholar
- IPCC (2007). Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. In: Metz B, Davidson O R, Bosch P R, Dave R, Meyer L A, eds. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
- Lioubimtseva E, Henebry G M (2012). Grain production trends in Russia, Ukraine and Kazakhstan: New opportunities in an increasingly unstable world? Frontiers of Earth Science, 6(2), DOI: 10.1007/s11707-012-0318-yGoogle Scholar
- McCauley M (1976). Khrushchev and the Development of Soviet Agriculture, the Virgin Land Programme 1953–1964. Plymouth: The Bowering PressGoogle Scholar
- NASA (2010). Nadir BRDF-adjusted reflectance 16-day L3 global 500 m. https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/lpdaac/products/modis_products_table/nadir_brdf_adjusted_reflectance/16_day_l3_global_500m/ mcd43a4. Accessed 05/13/2010
- Schneider U, Fuchs T, Meyer-Christoffer, Rudolf B (2008). Global precipitation analysis products. Global Precipitation Climatology Centre Internet Publication. http://gpcc.dwd.de. Accessed 05/12/201
- Viña A, Echavarria R, Rundquist D (2004). Satellite change detection analysis of deforestation rates and patterns along the Colombia-Ecuador border. Ambio, 33(3): 118–125Google Scholar
- Wright C K, de Beurs K M, Kovalskyy V, Henebry G M (2009b). Contrasting trends in land surface phenologies since 2000 in western Russia and northern Kazakhstan. Poster presented at: European Geosciences Union General Assembly, April 19-24, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar