Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 672–683 | Cite as

Encapsulation of 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol with tetraethyl orthosilicate for CO2 capture

  • Sidra Rama
  • Yan Zhang
  • Fideline Tchuenbou-Magaia
  • Yulong Ding
  • Yongliang LiEmail author
Open Access
Research Article


Carbon capture is widely recognised as an essential strategy to meet global goals for climate protection. Although various CO2 capture technologies including absorption, adsorption and membrane exist, they are not yet mature for post-combustion power plants mainly due to high energy penalty. Hence researchers are concentrating on developing non-aqueous solvents like ionic liquids, CO2-binding organic liquids, nanoparticle hybrid materials and microencapsulated sorbents to minimize the energy consumption for carbon capture. This research aims to develop a novel and efficient approach by encapsulating sorbents to capture CO2 in a cold environment. The conventional emulsion technique was selected for the microcapsule formulation by using 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP) as the core sorbent and silicon dioxide as the shell. This paper reports the findings on the formulated microcapsules including key formulation parameters, microstructure, size distribution and thermal cycling stability. Furthermore, the effects of microcapsule quality and absorption temperature on the CO2 loading capacity of the microcapsules were investigated using a self-developed pressure decay method. The preliminary results have shown that the AMP microcapsules are promising to replace conventional sorbents.


carbon capture microencapsulated sorbents emulsion technique low temperature adsorption and absorption 



The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Engineering and Physical Science Research Council (EPSRS) of the United Kingdom under the grants EP/N000714/1 and EP/N021142. We would also like to thank our colleagues at the Birmingham Centre for Energy Storage (BCES) for their expertise and insight that assisted the research.


  1. 1.
    Florin N, Fennell P. Carbon capture technology: Future fossil fuel use and mitigating climate change. Grantham Institute Climate Change Brief Paper, 2010, 3(3): 20Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderegg W R L, Prall J W, Harold J, Schneider S H. Expert credibility in climate change. Environmental Sciences, 2010, 107(27): 12107–12109Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Plasynski S I, Chen Z Y. Review of CO2 capture technologies and some improvement opportunities. ACS Division of Fuel Chemistry. Preprints, 2000, 45: 644–649Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zou J, Ho W S W. CO2-selective polymeric membranes containing amines in crosslinked poly(vinyl alcohol). Journal of Membrane Science, 2006, 286(1–2): 310–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tuinier M J, Hamers H P, Van Sint Annaland M. Techno-economic evaluation of cryogenic CO2 capture: A comparison with absorption and membrane technology. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2011, 5(6): 1559–1565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li P, Tezel F H. Equilibrium and kinetic analysis of CO2-N2 adsorption separation by concentration pulse chromatography. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2007, 313(1): 12–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li M, Jiang X, He G. Application of membrane separation technology in postcombustion carbon dioxide capture process. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2014, 8(2): 233–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Desideri U. Advanced absorption processes and technology for carbon dioxide (CO2) capture in power plants. In: Developments and Innovation in Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Capture and Storage Technology. Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2010, 155–182Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dai Z, Noble R D, Gin D L, Zhang X, Deng L. Combination of ionic liquids with membrane technology: A new approach for CO2 separation. Journal of Membrane Science, 2016, 497: 1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liu G X. Greenhouse gases—capturing, utilization and reduction. InTechOpen, 2012: 1–24.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vericella J J, Baker S E, Stolaroff J K, Duoss E B, Hardin J O, Lewicki J, Glogowski E, Floyd W C, Valdez C A, Smith W L, Satcher J H, Bourcier W L, Spadaccini C M, Lewis J A, Aines R D. Encapsulated liquid sorbents for carbon dioxide capture. Nature Communications, 2015, 6(1): 6124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Davidson R M. Post-combustion carbon capture—solid sorbents and membranes. Energy Procedia, 2013, 37: 134–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Peanparkdee M, Iwamoto S, Yamauchi R. Microencapsulation: A review of applications in the food and pharmaceutical industries. Reviews in Agricultural Science, 2016, 4(0): 56–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stolaroff J K, Ye C, Oakdale J S, Baker S E, Smith W L, Nguyen D T, Spadaccini C M, Aines R D. Microencapsulation of advanced solvents for carbon capture. Faraday Discussions, 2016, 192(0): 271–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jyothi Sri S, Seethadevi A, Suria Prabha K, Muthuprasanna P, Pavitra P. Microencapsulation: A review. International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences, 2012, 3(1): 509–531Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shah R K, Shum H C, Rowat A C, Lee D, Agresti J J, Utada A S, Chu L Y, Kim J W, Fernandez-Nieves A, Martinez C J, Weitz D A. Designer emulsions using microfluidics. Materials Today, 2008, 11(4): 18–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nielsen C J, Herrmann H, Weller C. Atmospheric chemistry and environmental impact of the use of amines in carbon capture and storage (CCS). Chemical Society Reviews, 2012, 41(19): 66–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shimekit B, Mukhtar H. Natural gas purification technologies—major advances for CO2 separation and future firections. In: Advances in Natural Gas Technology. InTechOpen, 2012, 235–270Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Harrod J F, Laine R M. Applications of organomettallic chemistry in the preparation and processing of advanced materials. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995, 3–25Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Innocenzi P. The Sol to Gel Transition. Berlin: Springer, 2016, 7–25Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bhakta S, Dixit C K, Bist I, Jalil K A, Suib S L, Rusling J F. Sodium hydroxide catalyzed monodispersed high surface area silica nanoparticles. Materials Research Express, 2016, 3(7): 1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Brinker C J. Hydrolysis and condensation of silicates: Effects on structure. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 1988, 100(1–3): 31–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang R, Li H, Liu W, He X. Surface modification of poly(urea-formaldehyde) microcapsules and the effect on the epoxy composites performance. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 2010, 47(10): 991–995Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kuriokase A B, Padma S, Padma Priya S. A Review on microcapsules. Global Journal of Pharmacology, 2015, 9(1): 28–39Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tarcha P J. Polymers for Controlled Drug Delivery. Florida: CRC Press, 1991: 286Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lowell S, Shields J E, Thomas M A, Thommes M. Characterisation of Porous Solids and Powders: Surface Area, Pore Size and Density. Berlin: Springer, 2004, 58–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vysloužil J, Doležel P, Kejdušová M, Mašková E, Mašek J, Lukáč R, Košt’ál V, Vetchý D, Dvořáčková K. Influence of different formulations and process parameters during the preparation of drug-loaded PLGA microspheres evaluated by multivariate data analysis. Acta Pharmaceutica (Zagreb, Croatia), 2014, 64(4): 403–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tamilvanan S, Sa B. Effect of production variables on the physical characteristics of ibuprofen-loaded polystyrene microparticles. Journal of Microencapsulation, 1999, 16(4): 411–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chan C, Maham Y, Mather A E, Mathonat C. Densities and volumetric properties of the aqueous solutions of 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol, n-butyldiethanolamine and n-propylethanolamine at temperature from 298.15 to 353.15 K. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 2002, 198(2): 239–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Majury T G. Amines and carboxylic acids as initiators of polymerization in caprolactam. Journal of Polymer Science. Polymer Physics Edition, 1958, 31(123): 383–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wan Isahak W N R, Che Ramli Z A, Mohamed Hisham M W, Yarmo M A. The formation of a series of carbonates from carbon dioxide: Capturing and utilisation. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 47: 93–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nair P S, Selvi P P. Absorption of carbon dioxide in packed column. International Journal of Science Research Publication, 2014, 4(1): 2250–3153Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Vericella J J, Baker S E, Stolaroff J K, Duoss E B, Hardin J O, Lewicki J, Glogowski E, Floyd W C, Valdez C A, Smith W L, et al. Encapsulated liquid sorbents for carbon dioxide capture. Nature Communications, 2015, 6(1): 6124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Aines R D, Spaddaccini C M, Duoss E B, Stolaroff J K, Vericella J, Lewis J A, Farthing G. Encapsulated solvents for carbon dioxide capture. Energy Procedia, 2013, 37: 219–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Stephens J C, Van Der Zwaan B, Kennedy J F. CO2 capture and storage (CCS): Exploring the research, development, demonstration, and deployment continuum. Energy Technology Innovation Project. Harvard University, 2005, 3–20Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Fredriksen S B, Jens K J. Oxidative degradation of aqueous amine solutions of MEA, AMP, MDEA, Pz: A review. Energy Procedia, 2013, 37: 1770–1777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nicholas B P, Lu Y. CO2 absorption into concentraed carbonate solutions with promoters at elevated temperatures. Dissertation for the Master’s Degree. Illinois: University of Illinois, 2014: 3–10Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Haslam T B R, Hershey R L, Keen R H. Industrial and engineering chemistry. Effect of gas velocity and temperature on rate of absorption. UTC, 2018, 18: 41Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wang T, Jens K J. Oxidative degradation of AMP/MEA blends for post-combustion CO2 capture. Energy Procedia, 2013, 37: 306–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sidra Rama
    • 1
  • Yan Zhang
    • 1
  • Fideline Tchuenbou-Magaia
    • 2
  • Yulong Ding
    • 1
  • Yongliang Li
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.School of Chemical EngineeringUniversity of BirminghamEdgbaston, BirminghamUK
  2. 2.School of EngineeringUniversity of WolverhamptonWolverhamptonUK

Personalised recommendations