Encapsulation of 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol with tetraethyl orthosilicate for CO2 capture
- 31 Downloads
Carbon capture is widely recognised as an essential strategy to meet global goals for climate protection. Although various CO2 capture technologies including absorption, adsorption and membrane exist, they are not yet mature for post-combustion power plants mainly due to high energy penalty. Hence researchers are concentrating on developing non-aqueous solvents like ionic liquids, CO2-binding organic liquids, nanoparticle hybrid materials and microencapsulated sorbents to minimize the energy consumption for carbon capture. This research aims to develop a novel and efficient approach by encapsulating sorbents to capture CO2 in a cold environment. The conventional emulsion technique was selected for the microcapsule formulation by using 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP) as the core sorbent and silicon dioxide as the shell. This paper reports the findings on the formulated microcapsules including key formulation parameters, microstructure, size distribution and thermal cycling stability. Furthermore, the effects of microcapsule quality and absorption temperature on the CO2 loading capacity of the microcapsules were investigated using a self-developed pressure decay method. The preliminary results have shown that the AMP microcapsules are promising to replace conventional sorbents.
Keywordscarbon capture microencapsulated sorbents emulsion technique low temperature adsorption and absorption
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Engineering and Physical Science Research Council (EPSRS) of the United Kingdom under the grants EP/N000714/1 and EP/N021142. We would also like to thank our colleagues at the Birmingham Centre for Energy Storage (BCES) for their expertise and insight that assisted the research.
- 1.Florin N, Fennell P. Carbon capture technology: Future fossil fuel use and mitigating climate change. Grantham Institute Climate Change Brief Paper, 2010, 3(3): 20Google Scholar
- 2.Anderegg W R L, Prall J W, Harold J, Schneider S H. Expert credibility in climate change. Environmental Sciences, 2010, 107(27): 12107–12109Google Scholar
- 3.Plasynski S I, Chen Z Y. Review of CO2 capture technologies and some improvement opportunities. ACS Division of Fuel Chemistry. Preprints, 2000, 45: 644–649Google Scholar
- 8.Desideri U. Advanced absorption processes and technology for carbon dioxide (CO2) capture in power plants. In: Developments and Innovation in Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Capture and Storage Technology. Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2010, 155–182Google Scholar
- 10.Liu G X. Greenhouse gases—capturing, utilization and reduction. InTechOpen, 2012: 1–24.Google Scholar
- 11.Vericella J J, Baker S E, Stolaroff J K, Duoss E B, Hardin J O, Lewicki J, Glogowski E, Floyd W C, Valdez C A, Smith W L, Satcher J H, Bourcier W L, Spadaccini C M, Lewis J A, Aines R D. Encapsulated liquid sorbents for carbon dioxide capture. Nature Communications, 2015, 6(1): 6124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Jyothi Sri S, Seethadevi A, Suria Prabha K, Muthuprasanna P, Pavitra P. Microencapsulation: A review. International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences, 2012, 3(1): 509–531Google Scholar
- 18.Shimekit B, Mukhtar H. Natural gas purification technologies—major advances for CO2 separation and future firections. In: Advances in Natural Gas Technology. InTechOpen, 2012, 235–270Google Scholar
- 19.Harrod J F, Laine R M. Applications of organomettallic chemistry in the preparation and processing of advanced materials. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995, 3–25Google Scholar
- 20.Innocenzi P. The Sol to Gel Transition. Berlin: Springer, 2016, 7–25Google Scholar
- 23.Wang R, Li H, Liu W, He X. Surface modification of poly(urea-formaldehyde) microcapsules and the effect on the epoxy composites performance. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 2010, 47(10): 991–995Google Scholar
- 24.Kuriokase A B, Padma S, Padma Priya S. A Review on microcapsules. Global Journal of Pharmacology, 2015, 9(1): 28–39Google Scholar
- 25.Tarcha P J. Polymers for Controlled Drug Delivery. Florida: CRC Press, 1991: 286Google Scholar
- 27.Vysloužil J, Doležel P, Kejdušová M, Mašková E, Mašek J, Lukáč R, Košt’ál V, Vetchý D, Dvořáčková K. Influence of different formulations and process parameters during the preparation of drug-loaded PLGA microspheres evaluated by multivariate data analysis. Acta Pharmaceutica (Zagreb, Croatia), 2014, 64(4): 403–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Nair P S, Selvi P P. Absorption of carbon dioxide in packed column. International Journal of Science Research Publication, 2014, 4(1): 2250–3153Google Scholar
- 35.Stephens J C, Van Der Zwaan B, Kennedy J F. CO2 capture and storage (CCS): Exploring the research, development, demonstration, and deployment continuum. Energy Technology Innovation Project. Harvard University, 2005, 3–20Google Scholar
- 37.Nicholas B P, Lu Y. CO2 absorption into concentraed carbonate solutions with promoters at elevated temperatures. Dissertation for the Master’s Degree. Illinois: University of Illinois, 2014: 3–10Google Scholar
- 38.Haslam T B R, Hershey R L, Keen R H. Industrial and engineering chemistry. Effect of gas velocity and temperature on rate of absorption. UTC, 2018, 18: 41Google Scholar
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.