Plasma-catalysis: Is it just a question of scale?

  • J. Christopher WhiteheadEmail author
Open Access
Review Article


The issues of describing and understanding the changes in performance that result when a catalyst is placed into plasma are discussed. The different chemical and physical interactions that result and how their combination might produce beneficial results for the plasma-catalytic processing of different gas streams are outlined with particular emphasis being placed on the different range of spatial and temporal scales that must be considered both in experiment and modelling. The focus is on non-thermal plasma where the lack of thermal equilibrium creates a range of temperature scales that must be considered. This contributes in part to a wide range of inhomogeneity in different properties such as species concentrations and electric fields that must be determined experimentally by in situ methods and be incorporated into modelling. It is concluded that plasma-catalysis is best regarded as conventional catalysis perturbed by the presence of a discharge, which modifies its operating conditions, properties and outcomes often in a very localised way. The sometimes used description “plasma-activated catalysis” is an apt one.


plasma catalysis plasma-activated catalysis non-thermal plasma CO2 conversion 


  1. 1.
    Kim H H, Teramoto Y, Ogata A, Takagi H, Nanba T. Plasma catalysis for environmental treatment and energy applications. Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing, 2016, 36(1): 45–72Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ray A B, Anderegg F O. The oxidation of carbon monoxide by passage with oxygen or air through the silent discharge and over ozone decomposing catalysts.1. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1921, 43(5): 967–978Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berthelot P E M. Research on the ozone layer and the effuse electric. Compte Rendu, 1879, 88: 50–52 (in French)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Whitehead J C. Plasma-catalysis: Introduction and history. In: Tu X, Nozaki T, Whitehead J C, eds. Plasma Catalysis. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG, 2018, Chapter 1Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Whitehead J C. Plasma catalysis for volatile organic compounds abatement. In: Handbook of Advanced Methods and Processes in Oxidation Catalysis. London: Imperial College Press, 2014, 155–172Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Whitehead J C. Plasma-catalysis: The known knowns, the known unknowns and the unknown unknowns. Journal of Physics. D, Applied Physics, 2016, 49(24): 243001Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Snoeckx R, Bogaerts A. Plasma technology—a novel solution for CO2 conversion? Chemical Society Reviews, 2017, 46(19): 5805–5863Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Neyts E C. Plasma-surface interactions in plasma catalysis. Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing, 2016, 36(1): 185–212Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Neyts E C, Ostrikov K, Sunkara M K, Bogaerts A. Plasma catalysis: Synergistic effects at the nanoscale. Chemical Reviews, 2015, 115 (24): 13408–13446Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Trinh Q H, Mok Y S. Environmental plasma-catalysis for the energy-efficient treatment of volatile organic compounds. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2016, 33(3): 735–748Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang Z J, Jang BWL, Liu C J. Recent advances in plasma catalysis (ISPCEM 2016). Topics in Catalysis, 2017, 60(12-14): 797–798Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen G, Britun N, Godfroid T, Georgieva V, Snyders R, Delplancke-Ogletree M P. An overview of CO2 conversion in a microwave discharge: The role of plasma-catalysis. Journal of Physics. D, Applied Physics, 2017, 50(8): 084001Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Feng X X, Liu H X, He C, Shen Z X, Wang T B. Synergistic effects and mechanism of a non-thermal plasma catalysis system in volatile organic compound removal: A review. Catalysis Science & Technology, 2018, 8(4): 936–954Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang B F, Xu X X, Xu W C, Wang N, Xiao H L, Sun Y H, Huang H M, Yu L, Fu M L, Wu J L, et al. The mechanism of non-thermal plasma catalysis on volatile organic compounds removal. Catalysis Surveys from Asia, 2018, 22(2): 73–94Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Neyts E C. Atomistic simulations of plasma catalytic processes. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2018, 12(1): 145–154Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bogaerts A, Neyts E C. Plasma technology: An emerging technology for energy storage. ACS Energy Letters, 2018, 3(4): 1013–1027Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Holzer F, Roland U, Kopinke F D. Combination of non-thermal plasma and heterogeneous catalysis for oxidation of volatile organic compounds Part 1. Accessibility of the intra-particle volume. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2002, 38(3): 163–181Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hibert C, Gaurand I, Motret O, Pouvesle J M O H. (X) measurements by resonant absorption spectroscopy in a pulsed dielectric barrier discharge. Journal of Applied Physics, 1999, 85 (10): 7070–7075Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kim H H, Teramoto Y, Negishi N, Ogata A. A multidisciplinary approach to understand the interactions of nonthermal plasma and catalyst: A review. Catalysis Today, 2015, 256(1): 13–22Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hensel K. Microdischarges in ceramic foams and honeycombs. European Physical Journal D, 2009, 54(2): 141–148Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gao J L, Zhu J J, Ehn A, Alden M, Li Z S. In-situ non-intrusive diagnostics of toluene removal by a gliding arc discharge using planar laser-induced fluorescence. Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing, 2017, 37(2): 433–450Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vorac J, Hnilica J, Kudrle V, Dvorak P. Spatially resolved measurement of hydroxyl (OH) radical concentration in a microwave plasma jet by planar laser-induced fluorescence. Open Chemistry, 2015, 13(1): 193–197Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Saiki Y, Suzuki Y. Effect of wall surface reaction on a methane-air premixed flame in narrow channels with different wall materials. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2013, 34(2): 3395–3402Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhou J F, Blomberg S, Gustafson J, Lundgren E, Zetterberg J. Simultaneous imaging of gas phase over and surface reflectance of a Pd(100) single crystal during CO oxidation. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2017, 121(42): 23511–23519Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Christensen P A, Ali A B, Mashhadani Z, Carroll M A, Martin P A. The production of ketene and C5O2 from CO2, N2 and CH4 in a nonthermal plasma catalysed by earth-abundant elements: An in-situ FTIR study. Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing, 2018, 38(3): 461–484Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stere C E, Adress W, Burch R, Chansai S, Goguet A, Graham W G, Hardacre C. Probing a non-thermal plasma activated heterogeneously catalyzed reaction using in situ DRIFTS-MS. ACS Catalysis, 2015, 5(2): 956–964Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jia Z, Rousseau A. Sorbent track: Quantitative monitoring of adsorbed VOCs under in-situ plasma exposure. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6(1): 31888Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Azzolina-Jury F, Thibault-Starzyk F. Mechanism of low pressure plasma-assisted CO2 hydrogenation over Ni-USY by microsecond time-resolved FTIR spectroscopy. Topics in Catalysis, 2017, 60(19-20): 1709–1721Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wulf A. The Invention of Nature: The Adventures of Alexander von Humboldt, the Lost Hero of Science. London: John Murray, 2015Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Neyts E C, Bogaerts A. Understanding plasma catalysis through modelling and simulation—a review. Journal of Physics. D, Applied Physics, 2014, 47(22): 224010Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kraus M, Eliasson B, Kogelschatz U, Wokaun A. CO2 reforming of methane by the combination of dielectric-barrier discharges and catalysis. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2001, 3(3): 294–300Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Roland U, Holzer F, Kopinke F D. Improved oxidation of air pollutants in a non-thermal plasma. Catalysis Today, 2002, 73(3-4): 315–323Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zhang Y R, Van Laer K, Neyts E C, Bogaerts A. Can plasma be formed in catalyst pores? A modeling investigation. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2016, 185: 56–67Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Fridman A. Plasma Chemistry. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008, 142Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhang Y R, Neyts E C, Bogaerts A. Enhancement of plasma generation in catalyst pores with different shapes. Plasma Sources Science & Technology, 2018, 27(5): 055008Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mizushima T, Matsumoto K, Ohkita H, Kakuta N. Catalytic effects of metal-loaded membrane-like alumina tubes on ammonia synthesis in atmospheric pressure plasma by dielectric barrier discharge. Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing, 2007, 27(1): 1–11Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mei D, Zhu X, He Y L, Yan J D, Tu X. Plasma-assisted conversion of CO2 in a dielectric barrier discharge reactor: Understanding the effect of packing materials. Plasma Sources Science & Technology, 2014, 24(1): 015011Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Michielsen I, Uytdenhouwen Y, Pype J, Michielsen B, Mertens J, Reniers F, Meynen V, Bogaerts A. CO2 dissociation in a packed bed DBD reactor: First steps towards a better understanding of plasma catalysis. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2017, 326: 477–488Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Butterworth T, Elder R, Allen R. Effects of particle size on CO2 reduction and discharge characteristics in a packed bed plasma reactor. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2016, 293: 55–67Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Xu S, Whitehead J C, Martin P A. CO2 conversion in a non-thermal, barium titanate packed bed plasma reactor: The effect of dilution by Ar and N2. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2017, 327: 764–773Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zhang Y, Wang H Y, Jiang W, Bogaerts A. Two-dimensional particle-in cell/Monte Carlo simulations of a packed-bed dielectric barrier discharge in air at atmospheric pressure. New Journal of Physics, 2015, 17(8): 12Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Koen Van L, Annemie B. Fluid modelling of a packed bed dielectric barrier discharge plasma reactor. Plasma Sources Science & Technology, 2016, 25(1): 015002Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Tu X, Whitehead J C. Plasma-catalytic dry reforming of methane in an atmospheric dielectric barrier discharge: Understanding the synergistic effect at low temperature. Applied Catalysis B-Environmental, 2012, 125: 439–448Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Glonek K, Wroblewska A, Makuch E, Ulejczyk B, Krawczyk K, Wrobel R J, Koren Z C, Michalkiewicz B. Oxidation of limonene using activated carbon modified in dielectric barrier discharge plasma. Applied Surface Science, 2017, 420: 873–881Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Liu L, Zheng C H, Wu S H, Gao X, Ni M J, Cen K F. Manganesecerium oxide catalysts prepared by non-thermal plasma for NO oxidation: Effect of O2 in discharge atmosphere. Applied Surface Science, 2017, 416: 78–85Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Wang Z, Zhang Y, Neyts E C, Cao X X, Zhang X S, Jang B W L, Liu C J. Catalyst preparation with plasmas: How does it work? ACS Catalysis, 2018, 8(3): 2093–2110Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Liu C J, Li M Y, Wang J Q, Zhou X T, Guo Q T, Yan J M, Li Y Z. Plasma methods for preparing green catalysts: Current status and perspective. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2016, 37(3): 340–348Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wang W, Wang Z, Wang J, Zhong C J, Liu C J. Highly active and stable Pt-Pd alloy catalysts synthesized by room-temperature electron reduction for oxygen reduction reaction. Advancement of Science, 2017, 4(4): 1600486Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Marinov D, Guaitella O, de los Arcos T, von Keudell A, Rousseau A. Adsorption and reactivity of nitrogen atoms on silica surface under plasma exposure. Journal of Physics. D, Applied Physics, 2014, 47(47): 475204Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Gibson E K, Stere C E, Curran-McAteer B, Jones W, Cibin G, Gianolio D, Goguet A, Wells P P, Catlow C R A, Collier P, Hinde P, Hardacre C. Probing the role of a non-thermal plasma (NTP) in the hybrid NTP catalytic oxidation of methane. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2017, 56(32): 9351–9355Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Nozaki T, Okazaki K. Non-thermal plasma catalysis of methane: Principles, energy efficiency, and applications. Catalysis Today, 2013, 211: 29–38Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Kameshima S, Tamura K, Mizukami R, Yamazaki T, Nozaki T. Parametric analysis of plasma-assisted pulsed dry methane reforming over Ni/Al2O3 catalyst. Plasma Processes and Polymers, 2017, 14(6): 1600096Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Bal K M, Huygh S, Bogaerts A, Neyts E C. Effect of plasmainduced surface charging on catalytic processes: Application to CO2 activation. Plasma Sources Science & Technology, 2018, 27(2): 024001Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Lee J, Sorescu D C, Deng X. Electron-induced dissociation of CO2 on TiO2(110). Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2011, 133 (26): 10066–10069Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Mei D, Zhu X, Wu C, Ashford B, Williams P T, Tu X. Plasmaphotocatalytic conversion of CO2 at low temperatures: Understanding the synergistic effect of plasma-catalysis. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2016, 182: 525–532Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Zhu X B, Zhang S, Yang Y, Zheng C H, Zhou J S, Gao X, Tu X. Enhanced performance for plasma-catalytic oxidation of ethyl acetate over La1-xCexCoO3 + δ catalysts. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2017, 213: 97–105Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ChemistryThe University of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations