Advertisement

Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 867–877 | Cite as

Research and development of hydrocracking catalysts and technologies in China

  • Chong Peng
  • Yanze Du
  • Xiang FengEmail author
  • Yongkang Hu
  • Xiangchen Fang
Review Article
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

Hydrocracking of petroleum feedstock represents a compelling route for the production of industrial clean fuels, which has triggered the continuous research and development of core technology related areas such as catalysts, reaction engineering and engineering design. This review particularly focuses on the research and development of catalysts and catalytic processes for hydrocracking of petroleum feedstock in China. Hydroprocessing technologies of China keep pace with the up-todate progress of the world, and some of the technologies have achieved leading role in the world. It is noted that China Petroleum and Chemical Corporation has a full range of hydroprocessing technologies and provides corresponding “tailor-made” catalysts. Through the efforts of several generations, 20 categories of the catalysts including more than 60 brands have been developed, among which more than 40 brands have been successfully applied for more than 130 times. Importantly, the pivotal technical improvements including the deep drawing vacuum gas-oil (VGO) and de-asphalting oil hydrocracking technology to improve material adaptability, the high value-added hydrogenation technology to convert high aromatic diesel conversion to naphtha, the hydrocracking technology using VGO-catalytic diesel blends, the Fushun Research Institute of Petroleum and Petrochemicals’ diesel to gasoline and diesel hydrocracking technologies, and the Sheer hydrocracking technology to reduce energy are reviewed.

Keywords

hydrocracking process catalyst China 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Key Technologies Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFB0306503), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21606254), the High-level Talent Innovation and Business Project of Dalian (No. 2017RQ085), the Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering (No. SKL-ChE-18C04) and Key Research and Development Plan of Shandong Province (No. 2017GSF17126).

References

  1. 1.
    Tian Z, Liang D, Lin L. Research and development of hydroisomerization and hydrocracking catalysts in dalian institute of chemical physics. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2009, 30(8): 705–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rojas M, Zeppieri S. Simulation of an industrial fixed-bed reactor with cocurrent downflow for hydrogenation of pygas. Catalysis Today, 2014, 220-222: 237–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ortiz-Moreno H, Ramíreza J, Sanchez-Minero F, Cuevas R, Ancheyta J. Hydrocracking of Maya crude oil in a slurry-phase batch reactor. II. Effect of catalyst load. Fuel, 2014, 130: 263–272Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Martinez-Grimaldo H, Ortiz-Moreno H, Sanchez-Minero F, Ramírez J, Cuevas-Garcia R, Ancheyta-Juarez J. Hydrocracking of Maya crude oil in a slurry-phase reactor. I. Effect of reaction temperature. Catalysis Today, 2014, 220-222: 295–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Khowatimy F A, Priastomo Y, Febriyanti E, Riyantoko H, Trisunaryantia W. Study of waste lubricant hydrocracking into fuel fraction over the combination of Y-Zeolite and ZnO catalyst. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2014, 20: 225–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lababidi HM, Chedadeh D, RiaziMR, Al-Qattan A, Al-Adwani H. Prediction of product quality for catalytic hydrocracking of vacuum gas oil. Fuel, 2011, 90(2): 719–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bezergianni S, Dimitriadis A, Karonis D. Diesel decarbonization via effective catalytic co-hydroprocessing of residual lipids with gas-oil. Fuel, 2014, 136: 366–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Murata K, Inaba M, Takahara I, Liu Y. Selective hydrocarbon production by the hydrocracking of glucose. Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis, 2013, 110(2): 295–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Furimsky E. Hydroprocessing in aqueous phase. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2013, 52(50): 17695–17713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang G, Li Z K, Huang H, Lan X, Xu C M, Gao J S. Synergistic process for coker gas oil and heavy cycle oil conversion for maximum light production. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2010, 49(22): 11260–11268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tang Z, Zhang Y, Guo Q. Catalytic hydrocracking of pyrolytic lignin to liquid fuel in supercritical ethanol. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2010, 49(5): 2040–2046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hanaoka T, Miyazawa T, Shimura K, Hirata S. Jet fuel synthesis in hydrocracking of fischer-tropsch product over Pt-loaded zeolite catalysts prepared using microemulsions. Fuel Processing Technology, 2015, 129: 139–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhang S, Xu R, Durham E, Roberts C B. Middle distillates production via fischer-tropsch synthesis with integrated upgrading under supercritical conditions. AIChE Journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2014, 60(7): 2573–2583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Šimáček P, Kubička D, Pospíšil M, Rubáš V, Hora L, Šebor G. Fischer-tropsch product as a co-feed for refinery hydrocracking unit. Fuel, 2013, 105: 432–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rodríguez Vallejo D F, de Klerk A. Improving the interface between fischer-tropsch synthesis and refining. Energy & Fuels, 2013, 27(6): 3137–3147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Laredo G C, Vega-Merino P M, Hernández P S. Light cycle oil upgrading to high quality fuels and petrochemicals: A review. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2018, 57(22): 7315–7321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sahu R, Song B J, Im J S, Jeon Y P, Lee C W. A review of recent advances in catalytic hydrocracking of heavy residues. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 2015, 27: 12–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Angeles M J, Leyva C, Ancheyta J, Ramírez S. A review of experimental procedures for heavy oil hydrocracking with dispersed catalyst. Catalysis Today, 2014, 220: 274–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fang X C, Guan M H, Liao S G. Hydrocracking. Beijing: China Petrochemical Press, 2008, 110–118 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Scherzer J, Gruia A J. Hydrocracking Science and Technology. Florida: CRC Press, 1996, 1–305Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Feng X, Yang J, Duan X Z, Cao Y Q, Chen B X, Chen W Y, Lin D, Qian G, Chen D, Yang C H, Zhou X. Enhanced catalytic performance for propene epoxidation with H2 and O2 over bimetallic Au-Ag/Uncalcined TS-1 catalysts. ACS Catalysis, 2018, 8(9): 7799–7808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Song Z, Feng X, Sheng N, Lin D, Li Y C, Liu Y B, Chen X B, Zhou X G, Chen D, Yang C H. Propene epoxidation with H2 and O2 on Au/TS-1 catalyst: Cost-effective synthesis of small-sized mesoporous TS-1 and its unique performance. Catalysis Today, 2018, in pressGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Peng C, Fang X, Zeng R. Development of high efficiency SHEER hydrocracking technology. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 31(3): 706–711Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chong Peng
    • 1
  • Yanze Du
    • 1
  • Xiang Feng
    • 2
    Email author
  • Yongkang Hu
    • 1
  • Xiangchen Fang
    • 1
  1. 1.Dalian Research Institute of Petroleum and PetrochemicalsSINOPECDalianChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil ProcessingChina University of PetroleumQingdaoChina

Personalised recommendations