Advertisement

Bismuth oxide-related photocatalysts in green nanotechnology: A critical analysis

  • Andrea P. Reverberi
  • P. S. Varbanov
  • M. Vocciante
  • B. Fabiano
Review Article

Abstract

A survey addressing the uses of bismuth oxide in photocatalysis is presented. The richness of literature on such a specific topic proves the growing importance of this compound as a valid tool in pollution abatement and environmental decontamination. Many research groups have focused their activity on how to improve the photocatalytic properties of this semiconductor and several solutions have been adopted in the synthesis method, often based on wet-chemical processes. The impressive development of nanoscience helped in understanding and identifying process variables and operative conditions aiming at optimizing the yield of this promising photocatalytic material in the utilization of solar energy.

Keywords

photocatalysis visible light bismuth compounds nanotechnology environmental remediation decontamination pollution abatement 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Andrea P. Reverberi is particularly grateful to Professors Maurizio Ferretti and Davide Comoretto for valuable discussions and helpful suggestions.

References

  1. 1.
    Bagatin R, Klemeš J J, Reverberi A P, Huisingh D. Conservation and improvements in water resource management: A global challenge. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2014, 77: 1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Van-Dal É S, Bouallou C. Design and simulation of a methanol production plant from CO2 hydrogenation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2013, 57: 38–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yu L, Ruan S, Xu X, Zou R, Hu J. One-dimensional nanomaterialassembled macroscopic membranes for water treatment. Nano Today, 2017, 17: 79–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pascariu V, Avadanei O, Gasner P, Stoica I, Reverberi A P, Mitoseriu L. Preparation and characterization of PbTiO 3-epoxy resin compositionally graded thick films. Phase Transitions, 2013, 86(7): 715–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang J, Gu H. Novel metal nanomaterials and their catalytic applications. Molecules, 2015, 20(9): 17070–17092CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mehring M. From molecules to bismuth oxide-based materials: Potential homo-and heterometallic precursors and model compounds. Coordination Chemistry Reviews, 2007, 251(7–8): 974–1006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Koziorowski J, Stanciu A E, Gómez-Vallejo V, Llop J. Radiolabeled nanoparticles for cancer diagnosis and therapy. Anti-cancer Agents in Medicinal Chemistry, 2017, 17(3): 333–354CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang X D, Chen J, Min Y, Park G B, Shen X, Song S S, Sun Y M, Wang H, Long W, Xie J, Gao K, Zhang L, Fan S, Fan F, Jeong U. Metabolizable Bi2Se3 nanoplates: Biodistribution, toxicity, and uses for cancer radiation therapy and imaging. Advanced Functional Materials, 2014, 24(12): 1718–1729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Debbage P, Jaschke W. Molecular imaging with nanoparticles: giant roles for dwarf actors. Histochemistry and Cell Biology, 2008, 130(5): 845–875CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hernández-Rivera M, Kumar I, Cho S Y, Cheong B Y, Pulikkathara M X, Moghaddam S E, Whitmire K H, Wilson L J. High-performance hybrid Bismuth-carbon nanotube based contrast agent for X-ray CT imaging. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2017, 9(7): 5709–5716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fabiano B, Pistritto F, Reverberi A, Palazzi E. Ethylene-air mixtures under flowing conditions: A model-based approach to explosion conditions. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2015, 17(5): 1261–1270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Solisio C, Reverberi A P, Del Borghi A, Dovi’ V G. Inverse estimation of temperature profiles in landfills using heat recovery fluids measurements. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2012, 2012: 747410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Palazzi E, Perego P, Fabiano B. Mathematical modelling and optimization of hydrogen continuous production in a fixed bed bioreactor. Chemical Engineering Science, 2002, 57(18): 3819–3830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Palazzi E, Caviglione C, Reverberi A P, Fabiano B. A short-cut analytical model of hydrocarbon pool fire of different geometries, with enhanced view factor evaluation. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2017, 110: 89–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Abu-Dief A M, Mohamed W S. α-Bi2O3 nanorods: Synthesis, characterization and UV-photocatalytic activity. Materials Research Express, 2017, 4(3): 035039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ding S, Niu J, Bao Y, Hu L. Evidence of superoxide radical contribution to demineralization of sulfamethoxazole by visiblelight-driven Bi2O3/Bi2O2CO3/Sr6Bi2O9 photocatalyst. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2013, 262: 812–818CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liu X, Deng H, Yao W, Jiang Q, Shen J. Preparation and photocatalytic activity of Y-doped Bi2O3. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2015, 651: 135–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sudrajat H. Cu(II)/Bi2O3 photocatalysis for toxicity reduction of atrazine in water environment under different light wavelengths. Environmental Processes, 2017, 4(2): 439–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Linsebiegler A L, Lu G, Yates J T Jr. Photocatalysis on TiO2 surfaces: Principles, mechanisms and selected results. Chemical Reviews, 1995, 95(3): 735–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Xu A W, Gao Y, Liu H Q. The preparation, characterization, and their photocatalytic activities of rare-earth doped TiO2 nanoparticles. Journal of Catalysis, 2002, 207(2): 151–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Drache M, Roussel P, Wignacourt J P. Structures and oxide mobility in Bi-Ln-O materials: Heritage of Bi2O3. Chemical Reviews, 2007, 107(1): 80–96CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Xie J, Li L, Tian C, Han C, Zhao D. Template-free synthesis of hierarchical constructed flower-like d-Bi2O3 microspheres with photocatalytic performance. Micro & Nano Letters, 2012, 7(7): 651–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sanna S, Esposito V, Andreasen J W, Hjelm J, Zhang W, Kasama T, Simonsen S B, Christensen M, Linderoth S, Pryds N. Enhancement of the chemical stability in confined d-Bi2O3. Nature Materials, 2015, 14(5): 500–504CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wang F, Cao K, Zhang Q, Gong X, Zhou Y. A computational study on the photoelectric properties of various Bi2O3 polymorphs as visible-light driven photocatalysts. Journal of Molecular Modeling, 2014, 20(11): 2506CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ho C H, Chan C H, Huang Y S, Tien L C, Chao L C. The study of optical band edge property of bismuth oxide nanowires α-Bi2O3. Optics Express, 2013, 21(10): 11965–11972CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhang G, Zhang X, Wu Y, Shi W, Guan W. Rapid microwaveassisted synthesis of Bi2O3 tubes and photocatalytic properties for antibiotics. Micro & Nano Letters, 2013, 8(4): 177–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yuvakkumar R, Hong S I. Structural, compositional and textural properties of monoclinic α-Bi2O3 nanocrystals. Spectrochimica Acta. Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 2015, 144: 281–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Iyyapushpam S, Nishanthi S T, Pathinettam Padiyan D. Synthesis of β-Bi2O3 towards the application of photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange and its instability. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, 2015, 81: 74–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schlesinger M, Weber M, Schulze S, Hietschold M, Mehring M. Metastable β-Bi2O3 nanoparticles with potential for photocatalytic water purification using visible light irradiation. ChemistryOpen, 2013, 2(4): 146–155CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yan Y, Zhou Z, Cheng Y, Qiu L, Gao C, Zhou J. Template-free fabrication of α-and β-Bi2O3 hollow spheres and their visible light photocatalytic activity for water purification. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2014, 605: 102–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Xiao X, Hu R, Liu C, Xing C, Qian C, Zuo X, Nan J, Wang L. Facile large-scale synthesis of β-Bi2O3 nanospheres as a highly efficient photocatalyst for the degradation of acetaminophen under visible light irradiation. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2013, 140–141: 433–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Qiu Y, Yang M, Fan H, Zuo Y, Shao Y, Xu Y, Yang X, Yang S. Nanowires of α-and β-Bi2O3: Phase selective synthesis and application in photocatalysis. CrystEngComm, 2011, 13(6): 1843–1850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hou J, Yang C, Wang Z, Zhou W, Jiao S, Zhu H. In situ synthesis of α-β phase heterojunctions on Bi2O3 nanowires with exceptional visible-light photocatalytic performance. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2013, 142–143: 504–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Astuti Y, Arnelli P, Fauziyah A, Nurhayati S, Wulansari A D, Andianingrum R, Widiyandari H, Bhaduri G A. Studying impact of different precipitating agents on crystal sructure, morphology, and photocatalytic activity of bismuth oxide. Bulletin of Chemical Reaction Engineering & Catalysis, 2017, 12(3): 478–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Jia B, Zhang J, Luan J, Li F, Han J. Synthesis and growth mechanism of various structures Bi2O3 via chemical precipitate method. Journal of Materials Science Materials in Electronics, 2017, 28(15): 11084–11090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hu Y, Li D, Sun F, Weng Y, You S, Shao Y. Temperature-induced phase changes in bismuth oxides and efficient photodegradation of phenol and p-chlorophenol. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2016, 301: 362–370CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wang W, Chen X, Liu G, Shen Z, Xia D, Wong P K, Yu J C. Monoclinic dibismuth tetraoxide: A new visible-light-driven photocatalyst for environmental remediation. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2015, 176–177: 444–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sajjad S, Leghari S A K, Zhang J. Nonstoichiometric Bi2O3: Efficient visible light photocatalyst. RSC Advances, 2013, 3(5): 1363–1367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Azizian-Kalandaragh Y, Sedaghatdoust-Bodagh F, Habibi-Yangjeh A. Ultrasound-assisted preparation and characterization of β-Bi2O3 nanostructures: Exploring the photocatalytic activity against rhodamine B. Superlattices and Microstructures, 2015, 81: 151–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Zhong S, Zou S, Peng X, Ma J, Zhang F. Effects of calcination temperature on preparation and properties of europium-doped bismuth oxide as visible light catalyst. Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology, 2015, 74(1): 220–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Xue S, He H, Fan Q, Yu C, Yang K, Huang W, Zhou Y, Xie Y. La/Ce-codoped Bi2O3 composite photocatalysts with high photocatalytic performance in removal of high concentration dye. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2017, 60: 70–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wu S, Fang J, Xua W, Cen C. Hydrothermal synthesis, characterization of visible-light-driven α-Bi2O3 enhanced by Pr3+ doping. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 2013, 88(10): 1828–1835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Viruthagiri G, Kannan P. Visible light mediated photocatalytic activity of cobalt doped Bi2O3 nanoparticles. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 2017 (in press) doi:10.1016/j. jmrt.2017.06.011Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Qin W, Qi J, Wu X. Photocatalytic property of Cu2+-doped Bi2O3 films under visible light prepared by the sol-gel method. Vacuum, 2014, 107: 204–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Raza W, Bahnemann D, Muneer M. A green approach for degradation of organic pollutants using rare earth metal doped bismuth oxide. Catalysis Today, 2018, 300: 89–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Luo X, Zhu G, Peng J, Wei X, Hojamberdiev M, Jin L, Liu P. Enhanced photocatalytic activity of Gd-doped porous β-Bi2O3 photocatalysts under visible light irradiation. Applied Surface Science, 2015, 351: 260–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Lim H, Rawal S B. Integrated Bi2O3 nanostructure modified with Au nanoparticles for enhanced photocatalytic activity under visible light irradiation. Progress in Natural Science: Materials International, 2017, 27(3): 289–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sharma R, Khanuja M, Sharma S N, Sinha O P. Reduced band gap & charge recombination rate in Se doped α-Bi2O3 leads to enhanced photoelectrochemical and photocatalytic performance: Theoretical & experimental insight. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(32): 20638–20648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Liang J, Zhu G, Liu P, Luo X, Tan C, Jin L, Zhou J. Synthesis and characterization of Fe-doped β-Bi2O3 porous microspheres with enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity. Superlattices and Microstructures, 2014, 72: 272–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Li J Z, Zhong J, Zeng J, Feng F, He J. Feng, He J. Improved photocatalytic activity of dysprosium-doped Bi2O3 prepared by sol-gel method. Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing, 2013, 16(2): 379–384Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Li Y, Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Sun X, Zhang J, Wang C, Peng Z, Si H. Preparation of Ag doped Bi2O3 nanosheets with highly enhanced visible light photocatalytic performances. Ceramics International, 2014, 40(8): 13275–13280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Faisal M, Ibrahim A A, Bouzid H, Al-Sayari S A, Al-Assiri M S, Ismail A A. Hydrothermal synthesis of Sr-doped α-Bi2O3 nanosheets as highly efficient photocatalysts under visible light. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, 2014, 387: 69–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Zhu G, Que W, Zhang J. Synthesis and photocatalytic performance of Ag-loaded β-Bi2O3 microspheres under visible light irradiation. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2011, 509(39): 9479–9486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Dai Y, Yin L. Synthesis and photocatalytic activity of Ag-Ti-Si ternary modified α-Bi2O3 nanoporous spheres. Materials Letters, 2015, 142: 225–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Hu H, Xiao C, Lin X, Chen K, Li H, Zhang X. Controllable fabrication of heterostructured Au/Bi2O3 with plasmon effect for efficient photodegradation of rhodamine 6G. Journal of Experimental Nanoscience, 2017, 12(1): 33–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Reddy J K, Srinivas B, Durga Kumari V D, Subrahmanyam M. Sm3+-doped Bi2O3 photocatalyst prepared by hydrothermal synthesis. ChemCatChem, 2009, 1: 492–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Jiang S, Wang L, Hao W, Li W, Xin H, Wang W, Wang T. Visiblelight photocatalytic activity of S-doped α-Bi2O3. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2015, 119: 14094–14101Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Jiang H Y, Liu J, Cheng K, Sun W, Lin J. Enhanced visible light photocatalysis of Bi2O3 upon fluorination. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2013, 117(39): 20029–22003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Shang J, Gao Y, Hao W C, Jing X, Xin H J, Wang L, Feng H F, Wang T M. Enhancing visible-light photocatalytic activity of α-Bi2O3 via non-metal N and S doping. Chinese Physics B, 2014, 23(3): 038103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Ortiz-Quiñonez J L, Zumeta-Dubé I, Díaz D, Nava-Etzana N, Cruz-Zaragoza E, Santiago-Jacinto P. Bismuth oxide nanoparticles partially substituted with EuIII, MnIV, and SiIV: Structural, spectroscopic, and optical findings. Inorganic Chemistry, 2017, 56(6): 3394–3403CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Kudo A, Miseki Y. Heterogeneous photocatalyst materials for water splitting. Chemical Society Reviews, 2009, 38(1): 253–278CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Ramandi S, Entezari M H, Ghows N. Sono-synthesis of novel magnetic nanocomposite (Ba-α-Bi2O3-g-Fe2O3) for the solar mineralization of amoxicillin in an aqueous solution. Physical Chemistry Research, 2017, 5(2): 253–268Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Reverberi A P, Maga L, Cerrato C, Fabiano B. Membrane processes for water recovery and decontamination. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering, 2014, 6: 75–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Margha F H, Abdel-Wahed M S, Gad-Allah T A. Nanocrystalline Bi2O3-B2O3-(MoO3 or V2O5) glass-ceramic systems for organic pollutants degradation. Ceramics International, 2015, 41(4): 5670–5676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Patil S P, Bethi B, Sonawane G H, Shrivastava V S, Sonawane S. Efficient adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine B dye over Bi2O3-bentonite nanocomposites: A kinetic study. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 2016, 34: 356–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Patil S P, Shrivastava V S, Sonawane G H, Sonawane S H. Synthesis of novel Bi2O3-montmorillonite nanocomposite with enhanced photocatalytic performance in dye degradation. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2015, 3(4): 2597–2603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Chew K H, Klemeš J J, Alwi S R W, Manan Z A, Reverberi A P. Total site heat integration considering pressure drops. Energies, 2015, 8(2): 1114–1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Xie T, Liu C, Xu L, Yang J, Zhou W. Novel heterojunction Bi2O3/SrFe12O19 magnetic photocatalyst with highly enhanced photocatalytic activity. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2013, 117(46): 24601–24610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Xia D, Lo IMC. Synthesis of magnetically separable Bi2O4/Fe3O4 hybrid nanocomposites with enhanced photocatalytic removal of ibuprofen under visible light irradiation. Water Research, 2016, 100: 393–404CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Ren A, Liu C, Hong Y, Shi W, Lin S, Li P. Enhanced visible-lightdriven photocatalytic activity for antibiotic degradation using magnetic NiFe2O4/Bi2O3 heterostructures. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2014, 258: 301–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Li J, Zhong J, He X, Huang S, Zeng J, He J, Shi W. Enhanced photocatalytic activity of Fe3O4 decorated Bi2O3. Applied Surface Science, 2013, 284: 527–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Ayekoe P Y, Robert D, Lanciné Goné D. TiO2/Bi2O3 photocatalysts for elimination of water contaminants. Part 1: Synthesis of α-and β-Bi2O3 nanoparticles. Environmental Chemistry Letters, 2015, 13(3): 327–332Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Chakraborty A K, Hossain M E, Rhaman M M, Sobahan K M A. Fabrication of Bi2O3/TiO2 nanocomposites and their applications to the degradation of pollutants in air and water under visible-light. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2014, 26(2): 458–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Malligavathy M, Iyyapushpam S, Nishanthi S T, Pathinettam Padiyan D. Remarkable catalytic activity of Bi2O3/TiO2 nanocomposites prepared by hydrothermal method for the degradation of methyl orange. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2017, 19(4): 144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Balachandran S, Swaminathan M. Facile fabrication of heterostructured Bi2O3-ZnO photocatalyst and its enhanced photocatalytic activity. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2012, 116(50): 26306–26312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Štengl V, Henych J, Slušná M, Tolasz J, Zetková K. ZnO/Bi2O3 nanowire composites as a new family of photocatalysts. Powder Technology, 2015, 270: 83–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Chen C Y, Weng J C, Chen J H, Ma S H, Chen K H, Horng T L, Tsay C Y, Chang C J, Lin C K, Wug J J. Photocatalyst ZnO-doped Bi2O3 powder prepared by spray pyrolysis. Powder Technology, 2015, 272: 316–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Wang X, Ren P, Fan H. Room-temperature solid state synthesis of ZnO/Bi2O3 heterojunction and their solar light photocatalytic performance. Materials Research Bulletin, 2015, 64: 82–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Abdelkader E, Nadjia L, Ahmed B. Synthesis, characterization and UV-A light photocatalytic activity of 20 wt% SrO-CuBi2O4 composite. Applied Surface Science, 2012, 258(12): 5010–5024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Abdulkarem A M, Aref A A, Abdulhabeeb A, Li Y F, Yu Y. Synthesis of Bi2O3/Cu2O nanoflowers by hydrothermal method and its photocatalytic activity enhancement under simulated sunlight. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2013, 560: 132–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Hossain M K, Samu G F, Gandha K, Santhanagopalan S, Ping Liu J, Janáky C, Rajeshwar K. Solution combustion synthesis, characterization, and photocatalytic activity of CuBi2O4 and Its nanocomposites with CuO and α-Bi2O3. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2017, 121(15): 8252–8261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Xie Y, Zhang Y, Yang G, Liu C, Wang J. Hydrothermal synthesis of CuBi2O4 nanosheets and their photocatalytic behavior under visible light irradiation. Materials Letters, 2013, 107: 291–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Li T, Luo S. Hydrothermal synthesis of Ag2O/Bi2O3 microspheres for efficient photocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine B under visible light irradiation. Ceramics International, 2015, 41(10): 13135–13146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Cheng H, Hou J, Zhu H, Guo X M. Plasmonic Z-scheme α/β-Bi2O3-Ag-AgCl photocatalyst with enhanced visible-light photocatalytic performance. RSC Advances, 2014, 4(78): 41622–41630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Gou W, Wu P, Jiang D, Ma X. Synthesis of AgBr@Bi2O3 composite with enhanced photocatalytic performance under visible light. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2015, 646: 437–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    D’Angelo D, Filice S, Scarangella A, Iannazzo D, Compagnini G, Scalese S. Bi2O3/Nexar® polymer nanocomposite membranes for azo dyes removal by UV-vis or visible light irradiation. Catalysis Today, 2017 (in press) doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2017.12.013Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Que Q, Xing Y, He Z, Yang Y, Yin X, Que W. Bi2O3/Carbon quantum dots heterostructured photocatalysts with enhanced photocatalytic activity. Materials Letters, 2017, 209: 220–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Dang X, Zhang X, Chen Y, Dong X, Wang G, Ma C, Zhang X, Ma H, Xue M. Preparation of β-Bi2O3/g-C3N4 nanosheet p–n junction for enhanced photocatalytic ability under visible light illumination. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 2015, 17(2): 1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Chen D, Wu S, Fang J, Lu S, Zhou G, Feng W, Yang F, Chen Y, Fang Z. A nanosheet-like α-Bi2O3/g-C3N4 heterostructure modified by plasmonic metallic Bi and oxygen vacancies with high photodegradation activity of organic pollutants. Separation and Purification Technology, 2018, 193: 232–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Zhang J, Hu Y, Jiang X, Chen S, Meng S, Fu X. Design of a direct Z-scheme photocatalyst: Preparation and characterization of Bi2O3/g-C3N4 with high visible light activity. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2014, 280: 713–722CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Han S, Li J, Yang K, Lin J. Fabrication of a β-Bi2O3/BiOI heterojunction and its efficient photocatalysis for organic dye removal. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2015, 36(12): 2119–2126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Cheng L, Liu X, Kang Y. Bi5O7I/Bi2O3: A novel heterojunctionstructured visible light-driven photocatalyst. Materials Letters, 2014, 134: 218–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Chen L, Zhang Q, Huang R, Yin S F, Luo S L, Au C T. Porous peanut-like Bi2O3-BiVO4 composites with heterojunctions: onestep synthesis and their photocatalytic properties. Dalton Transactions, 2012, 41(31): 9513–9518CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Chen L, He J, Yuan Q, Liu Y, Au C T, Yin S F. Environmentally benign synthesis of branched Bi2O3-Bi2S3 photocatalysts by an etching and re-growth method. Journal of Materials Chemistry A: Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 2015, 3(3): 1096–1102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Charanpahari A, Umare S S, Sasikala R. Enhanced photodegradation of dyes on Bi2O3 microflakes: Effect of GeO2 addition on photocatalytic activity. Separation and Purification Technology, 2014, 133: 438–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Zeng J, Li J, Zhong J, Huang S, Shi W, He J. Synthesis, characterization and solar photocatalytic performance of In2O3-decorated Bi2O3. Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing, 2013, 16(6): 1808–1812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Peng Y, Yan M, Chen Q G, Fan C M, Zhou H Y, Xu A W. Novel one-dimensional Bi2O3-Bi2WO6 p-n hierarchical heterojunction with enhanced photocatalytic activity. Journal of Materials Chemistry A: Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 2014, 2 (22): 8517–8524Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Ma J, Zhang L Z, Wang Y H, Lei S L, Luo X B, Chen S H, Zeng G S, Zou J P, Luo S L, Au C T. Mechanism of 2,4-dinitrophenol photocatalytic degradation by z-Bi2O3/Bi2MoO6 composites under solar and visible light irradiation. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2014, 251: 371–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Chen S, Hu Y, Ji L, Jiang X, Fu X. Preparation and characterization of direct Z-scheme photocatalyst Bi2O3/NaNbO3 and its reaction mechanism. Applied Surface Science, 2014, 292: 357–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Larosa C, Salerno M, Nanni P, Reverberi A P. Cobalt cementation in an ethanol-water system: Kinetics and morphology of metal aggregates. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2012, 51(51): 16564–16572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Reverberi A P, Kuznetsov N T, Meshalkin V P, Salerno M, Fabiano B. Systematical analysis of chemical methods in metal nanoparticles synthesis. Theoretical Foundations of Chemical Engineering, 2016, 50(1): 59–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Toccafondi C, Dante S, Reverberi A P, Salerno M. Biomedical applications of anodic porous alumina. Current Nanoscience, 2015, 11(5): 572–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Reverberi A P, Vocciante M, Lunghi E, Pietrelli L, Fabiano B. New trends in the synthesis of nanoparticles by green methods. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 2017, 61: 667–672Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Meng X, Zhang Z. Bismuth-based photocatalytic semiconductors: Introduction, challenges and possible approaches. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, 2016, 423: 533–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Li S, Ye G, Chen G. Low-temperature preparation and characterization of nanocrystalline anatase TiO2. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2009, 113(10): 4031–4037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Yong J Y, Klemeš J J, Varbanov P S, Huisingh D. Cleaner energy for cleaner production: Modelling, simulation, optimisation and waste management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 111: 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Fan Y V, Varbanov P S, Klemeš J J, Nemet A. Process efficiency optimisation and integration for cleaner production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 174: 177–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Reverberi A P, Klemeš J J, Varbanov P S, Fabiano B. A review on hydrogen production from hydrogen sulphide by chemical and photochemical methods. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 136: 72–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrea P. Reverberi
    • 1
  • P. S. Varbanov
    • 2
  • M. Vocciante
    • 1
  • B. Fabiano
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Chemistry and Industrial ChemistryGenoa UniversityGenoaItaly
  2. 2.Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Faculty of Information Technology and BionicsBudapestHungary
  3. 3.Department of Civil, Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Polytechnic SchoolGenoa UniversityGenoaItaly

Personalised recommendations