Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering

, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp 357–365 | Cite as

Predicting the yield of pomegranate oil from supercritical extraction using artificial neural networks and an adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system

Research Article

Abstract

Various simulation tools were used to develop an effective intelligent system to predict the effects of temperature and pressure on an oil extraction yield. Pomegranate oil was extracted using a supercritical CO2 (SC-CO2) process. Several simulation systems including a back-propagation neural network (BPNN), a radial basis function neural network (RBFNN) and an adaptivenetwork-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) were tested and their results were compared to determine the best predictive model. The performance of these networks was evaluated using the coefficient of determination (R 2) and the mean square error (MSE). The best correlation between the predicted and the experimental data was achieved using the BPNN method with an R 2 of 0.9948.

Keywords

oil recovery artificial intelligence extraction neural networks supercritical extraction 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Fadavi A, Barzegar M, Hossein Azizi M. Determination of fatty acids and total lipid content in oilseed of 25 pomegranates varieties grown in Iran. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 2006, 19(6): 676–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Engin H, Erogul D, Aksehirli M, Hepaksoy S, Kukul Y. In leaf water potential of pomegranate (Punica Granatum l.) under different irrigation levels. Acta Horticulturae, 2006, 818: 193–198 (ISHS)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kulkarni A P, Aradhya S M. Chemical changes and antioxidant activity in pomegranate arils during fruit development. Food Chemistry, 2005, 93(2): 319–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Abbasi H, Rezaei K, Emamdjomeh Z, Mousavi S M E. Effect of various extraction conditions on the phenolic contents of pomegranate seed oil. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, 2008, 110(5): 435–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Abbasi H, Rezaei K, Rashidi L. Extraction of essential oils from the seeds of pomegranate using organic solvents and supercritical CO2. Journal of the American Oil Chemists. Society, 2008, 85(1): 83–89Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ozgen M, Durgaç C, Serçe S, Kaya C. Chemical and antioxidant properties of pomegranate cultivars grown in the Mediterranean region of Turkey. Food Chemistry, 2008, 111(3): 703–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gil M I, Tomás-Barberán F A, Hess-Pierce B, Holcroft D M, Kader A A. Antioxidant activity of pomegranate juice and its relationship with phenolic composition and processing. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2000, 48(10): 4581–4589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hora J J, Maydew E R, Lansky E P, Dwivedi C. Chemopreventive effects of pomegranate seed oil on skin tumor development in CD1 mice. Journal of Medicinal Food, 2003, 6(3): 157–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kassama L S, Shi J, Mittal G S. Optimization of supercritical fluid extraction of lycopene from tomato skin with central composite rotatable design model. Separation and Purification Technology, 2008, 60(3): 278–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sahena F, Zaidul I S M, Jinap S, Karim A A, Abbas K A, Norulaini N A N, Omar A K M. Application of supercritical CO2 in lipid extraction—a review. Journal of Food Engineering, 2009, 95(2): 240–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Macías-Sánchez M D, Serrano C M, Rodríguez M R, de la Ossa E M. Kinetics of the supercritical fluid extraction of carotenoids from microalgae with CO2 and ethanol as cosolvent. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2009, 150(1): 104–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rodríguez N R, de Diego S M, Beltrán S, Jaime I, Sanz MT, Rovira J. Supercritical fluid extraction of the omega-3 rich oil contained in hake (Merluccius capensis-Merluccius paradoxus) by-products: Study of the influence of process parameters on the extraction yield and oil quality. Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 2008, 47(2): 215–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Raasimman M, Govindarajan I, Karthikeyan C. Artificial neural network modeling of an inverse fluidized bed bioreactor. Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management, 2010, 11(2): 65–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jang J S R. ANFIS: Adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. Systems, Man and Cybernetics. IEEE Transactions on, 1993, 23(3): 665–685Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moghaddam A H, Sargolzaei J, Asl M H, Derakhshanfard F. Effect of different parameters on WEPS production and thermal behavior prediction using artificial neural network (ANN). Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering, 2012, 51(5): 480–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yang S, Shi W, Zeng J. Modelling the supercritical fluid extraction of lycopene from tomato paste waste using neuro-fuzzy approaches. Advances in Neural Networks-ISNN, 2004, 3174: 129–140Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zahedi G, Azizia S, Hatamia T, Sheikhattar L. Gray box modeling of supercritical nimbin extraction from neem seeds using methanol as co-solvent. Open Chemical Engineering Journal, 2010, 4(1): 21–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Izadifar M, Abdolahi F. Comparison between neural network and mathematical modeling of supercritical CO2 extraction of black pepper essential oil. Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 2006, 38(1): 37–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mitra P, Barman P C, Chang K S. Coumarin extraction from cuscuta reflexa using supercritical fluid carbon dioxide and development of an artificial neural network model to predict the coumarin yield. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 2011, 4(5): 737–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Menhaj M. Fundamentals of neural networks. Computational Intelligence, 1998, 2: 222–229Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kalavathi M S, Reddy B R, Singh B P. Modeling transformer internal short circuit faults using neural network techniques. 2005 Annual Report Conference on Electrical Insulation and Dielectric Phenomena, 2005, 601–604Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bors A G, Gabbouj M. Minimal topology for a radial basis functions neural network for pattern classification. Digital Signal Processing, 1994, 4(3): 173–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Poggio T, Girosi F. Networks for approximation and learning. Proceedings of the IEEE, 1990, 78(9): 1481–1497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bors A G, Pitas I. Median radial basis function neural network. Neural Networks. IEEE Transactions on, 1996, 7(6): 1351–1364Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ni Y, Xia Z, Kokot S. A kinetic spectrophotometric method for simultaneous determination of phenol and its three derivatives with the aid of artificial neural network. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2011, 192(2): 722–729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wedge D C, Ingram DM, Mingham C G, McLean D A, Bandar Z A. Neural network architectures and overtopping predictions. Proceedings of the ICE-Maritime Engineering, 2005, 158(3): 123–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Liu F, Nie P C, Huang M, Kong W W, He Y. Nondestructive determination of nutritional information in oil seed rape leaves using visible/near infrared spectroscopy and multivariate calibrations. Science China Information Sciences, 2011, 54(3): 598–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pan Y, Jiang J, Wang Z. Quantitative structure-property relationship studies for predicting flash points of alkanes using group bond contribution method with back-propagation neural network. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2007, 147(1–2): 424–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fazilat H, Ghatarband M, Mazinani S, Asadi Z, Shiri M, Kalaee M. Predicting the mechanical properties of glass fiber reinforced polymers via artificial neural network and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Computational Materials Science, 2012, 58: 31–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Iyatomi H, Hagiwara M. Adaptive fuzzy inference neural network. Pattern Recognition, 2004, 37(10): 2049–2057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pomares H, Rojas I, González J, Prieto A. Structure identification in complete rule-based fuzzy systems. Fuzzy Systems. IEEE Transactions on, 2002, 10(3): 349–359Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pomares H, Rojas I, Gonzalez J, Prieto A. A method for structure identification in complete rule-based fuzzy systems. IEEE, 2001, pp: 376–379Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sargolzaei J, Saghatoleslami N, Mosavi S M, Khoshnoodi M. Comparative study of artificial neural networks (ANN) and statistical methods for predicting the performance of ultrafiltration process in the milk industry. Iranian Journal of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering, 2006, 25(2): 67–76Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sargolzaei J, Kianifar A. Modeling and simulation of wind turbine Savonius rotors using artificial neural networks for estimation of the power ratio and torque. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 2009, 17(7): 1290–1298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Richard Bowen W, Jones M G, Yousef H N S. Prediction of the rate of crossflow membrane ultrafiltration of colloids: A neural network approach. Chemical Engineering Science, 1998, 53(22): 3793–3802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hagan M T, Menhaj M B. Training feedforward networks with the Marquardt algorithm. Neural Networks. IEEE Transactions on, 1994, 5(6): 989–993Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sharma A, Grover P, Kumar R. Reusability assessment for software components. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 2009, 34(2): 1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tang L, Zeng G M, Shen G L, Zhang Y, Huang G H, Li J B. Simultaneous amperometric determination of lignin peroxidase and manganese peroxidase activities in compost bioremediation using artificial neural networks. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2006, 579(1): 109–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zahra F, Jeyasurya B, Quaicoe J. High-speed transmission line relaying using artificial neural networks. Electric Power Systems Research, 2000, 53(3): 173–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hosseini H G, Luo D, Xu G, Liu H, Benjamin D. Intelligent fish freshness assessment. Journal of Sensors, 2008, 2008: 1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Anwar N, Khan M S, Ahmed K, Ahmad A, Athar A. Speed scheduling of autonomous railway vehicle control system using ANN. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 2011, 2(6): 1–6Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Tolba A, Abu-Rezq A. Combined classifiers for invariant face recognition. Pattern Analysis & Applications, 2000, 3(4): 289–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lahsasna A, Ainon R, Wah T Y. Intelligent credit scoring model using soft computing approach. IEEE, 2008, 396–402Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Venkatraghavan V, Acharya U R, Pal M, Paul R R, Min L C, Ray A K, Chatterjee J, Chakraborty C. Automated oral cancer identification using histopathological images: A hybrid feature extraction paradigm. Micron (Oxford, England), 2011, 43(2–3): 352–364Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of chemical engineeringFerdowsi university of MashhadMashhadIran

Personalised recommendations