CFD simulation of the hydrodynamics in an internal air-lift reactor with two different configurations
- 211 Downloads
- 8 Citations
Abstract
Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) was used to investigate the hydrodynamic parameters of two internal airlift bioreactors with different configurations. Both had a riser diameter of 0.1 m. The model was used to predict the effect of the reactor geometry on the reactor hydrodynamics. Water was utilized as the continuous phase and air in the form of bubbles was applied as the dispersed phase. A two-phase flow model provided by the bubbly flow application mode was employed in this project. In the liquid phase, the turbulence can be described using the k-ɛ model. Simulated gas holdup and liquid circulation velocity results were compared with experimental data. The predictions of the simulation are in good agreement with the experimental data.
Keywords
airlift reactor gas holdup liquid circulation velocity bubbly flow computational fluid dynamics (CFD)Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Blenke H. Loop reactors. Advances in Biochemical Engineering, 1979, 13: 121–214Google Scholar
- 2.Chisti M Y. Airlift Bioreactors. London and New York: Elsevier Applied Science, 1989Google Scholar
- 3.Sáez A E, Marquez M A, Roberts G W, Carbonell R G. Hydrodynamic model for gas-lift reactors. AIChE Journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 1998, 44(6): 1413–1423Google Scholar
- 4.Joshi J B, Ranade V V, Gharat S D, Lele S S. Sparged loop reactors. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 1990, 68(5): 705–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Merchuk J C, Stein Y. Local holdup and liquid velocity in air-lift reactors. AIChE Journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 1981, 27(3): 377–388Google Scholar
- 6.Siegel M H, Robinson C W. Applications of airlift gas-liquid-solid reactors in biotechnology. Chemical Engineering Science, 1992, 47(13–14): 3215–3229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Chisti M Y, Moo-Young M. Air-lift reactors: characteristic applications and design considerations. Chemical Engineering Communications, 1987, 60(1): 195–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.van Baten JM, Ellenberger J, Krishna R. Hydrodynamics of internal air lift reactors: experiments versus CFD simulations. Chemical Engineering and Processing, 2003, 42(10): 733–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Pironti F F, Medina V R, Calvo R, Saez A E. Effect of draft tube position on the hydrodynamics of a draft tube slurry bubble column. The Chemical Engineering Journal and the Biochemical Engineering Journal, 1995, 60(1–3): 155–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Koide K, Kurematsu K, Iwamoto S, Iwata Y, Horibe K. Gas holdup and volumetric liquid-phase mass transfer coefficient in bubble column with draught tube and with gas dispersion into tube. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, 1983, 16(5): 413–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Hwang S J, Fan L S. Some design considerations of a draft tube gasliquid-solid spouted bed. The Chemical Engineering Journal, 1986, 33(1): 49–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Wachi S, Jones A G, Elson T P. Flow dynamics in a draft tube bubble column using various Liquids. Chemical Engineering Science, 1991, 46(2): 657–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Hekmat A, Amooghin A E, Moraveji M K. CFD simulation of gasliquid flow behavior in an airlift reactor: determination of the optimum distance of the draft tube. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 2010, 18(7): 927–945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Romkes S J P, Dautzenberg F M, van den Bleek C M, Calis H P A. CFD modeling and experimental validation of particle-to-fluid mass and heat transfer in a packed bed at very low channel to particle diameter ratio. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2003, 96(1–3): 3–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Jafari A, Zamankhan P, Mousavi S M, Pietarinen K. Modeling and CFD simulation of flow behavior and dispersivity through randomly packed bed reactors. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2008, 144(3): 476–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar