Frontiers of Chemical Engineering in China

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 196–206 | Cite as

Techno-economic assessment of pulverized coal boilers and IGCC power plants with CO2 capture

  • Y. Huang
  • S. Rezvani
  • D. McIlveen-Wright
  • N. Hewitt
  • A. Minchener
  • J. Mondol
Review Article

Abstract

The current studies on power plant technologies suggest that Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) systems are an effective and economic CO2 capture technology pathway. In addition, the system in conventional configuration has the advantage of being more “CO2 capture ready” than other technologies. Pulverized coal boilers (PC) have, however, proven high technical performance attributes and are economically often most practical technologies. To highlight the pros and cons of both technologies in connection with an integrated CO2 capture, a comparative analysis of ultrasupercritical PC and IGCC is carried out in this paper. The technical design, the mass and energy balance and the system optimizations are implemented by using the ECLIPSE chemical plant simulation software package. Built upon these technologies, the CO2 capture facilities are incorporated within the system. The most appropriate CO2 capture systems for the PC system selected for this work are the oxy-fuel system and the postcombustion scheme using Monoethanolamine solvent scrubber column (MEA). The IGCC systems are designed in two configurations: Water gas shift reactor and Selexol-based separation. Both options generate CO2-rich and hydrogen rich-gas streams. Following the comparative analysis of the technical performance attributes of the above cycles, the economic assessment is carried out using the economic toolbox of ECLIPSE is seamlessly connected to the results of the mass and energy balance as well as the utility usages. The total cost assessment is implemented according to the step-count exponential costing method using the dominant factors and/or a combination of parameters. Subsequently, based on a set of assumptions, the net present value estimation is implemented to calculate the breakeven electricity selling prices and the CO2 avoidance cost.

Keywords

integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) Oxy-fuel combustion CO2 capture super-critical pulverized coal (SPC) amine scrubbing system techno-economic analysis break-even electricity selling price (BESP) 

References

  1. 1.
    Chiesa P, Consonni S, Kreutz T, Williams R. Co-production of hydrogen, electricity and CO2 from coal with commercially ready technology. Part A: Performance and emissions. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2005, 30: 747–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Metz B, Davidson O, de Coninck H C, Loos M and Meyer L A, eds. IPCC, 2005: IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage. Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005, 54–88Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    McMullan J T, Williams B C, Campbell P, McILveen-Wright D R, Bemtgen J M. Techno-economic assessment studies of fossil fuel and fuel wood power generation technologies, R&D in clean coal technology. JOULE II Programme, European Commission, CIEMAT, 1995, ISBN 84 7843 280 XGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Williams, B C, McMullan, J T. Techno-economic analysis of fuel conversion and power generation systems-the development of a portable chemical process simulator with capital cost and economic performance analysis capabilities. Int J Energy Research, 1996, 20: 125–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rezvani S, Bolland O, Franco F, Huang Y, Span R, Keyser J, Sander F, McIIveen-Wright D and Hewitt N. Natural gas oxy-fuel cycles—Part 3: Economic evaluation. Energy Procedia, 2009, 1(1): 565–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Huang Y, Rezvani S, McIlveen-Wright D, Minchener A, Hewitt N. Techno-economic study of CO2 capture and storage in coal fired oxygen fed entrained flow IGCC power plants. Fuel Processing Technology, 2008, 89(9): 916–925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rezvani S, Huang Y, McIlveen-Wright D, Wang Y D. Comparative assessment of sub-critical versus advanced super-critical oxy-fuel PF boilers with CO2 sequestration facilities. Fuel, 2007, 86: 2134–2143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Huang Y, McIlveen-Wright D, Rezvani S, Wang Y D, Hewitt N, Williams B C. Biomass co-firing in a pressurized fluidized bed combustion (PFBC) combined cycle power plant: A technoenvironmental assessment based on computational simulations. Fuel Processing Technology, 2006, 87: 927–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Davison J, Bressan L, Domenichim R. CO2 capture in coal based IGCC power plants. 7th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Vancouver, Canada, September, 2004, Volume 1Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Campbell P E, McMullan J T, Williams B C. Concept for a competitive coal fired integrated gasification combined cycle power plant. Fuel, 2000, 79: 1031–1040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rezvani S, Huang Y, McIlveen-Wright D, Hewitt N, Mondol J. Comparative assessment of coal fired IGCC systems with CO2 capture using physical absorption, membrane reactors and chemical looping. Fuel, 2009, 86: 2463–2472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Evans R, Huang Y, Williams B C. The influence of feedstock properties on the techno-economic performance of coal fired IGCC, IchemE. Gasification for the Future, The Netherlands, 2004, 8: 1–19Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Weishaupt R. Purification and CO conversion downstream the gasification. In: 7th European Gasification Conference. Barcelona, April 25–27, 2006Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Davison J. Performance and costs of power plants with capture and storage of CO2. Energy, 2007, 32: 1163–1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Holt N, Booras G, Todd D. A summary of recent IGCC studies of CO2 capture for sequestration. In: The Gasification Technologies Conference San Francisco, October, 2003Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ordorica-Garcia G, Douglas P, Croiset E, Zheng L G. Technoeconomic evaluation of IGCC power plants for CO2 avoidance. Energy Conversion and Management, 2006, 47, 2250–2259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sundkvist S G, Klang Å, Sjödin M, Wilhelmsen K, Åsen K, Tintinelli A, McCahey S, Huang Y. AZEP gas turbine combined cycle power plants-thermal optimisation and LCA analysis. Greenhouse gas control technologies, 2005, 7: 263–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sekkappan G, Melling P J, Anheden M, Lindgren G, Kluger F, Molinero I S, Maggauer C, Doukelis A. Oxy-fuel technology for CO2 capture from advanced supercritical pulverized fuel plants. In: 8th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies. Trondheim Norway, Proceedings of GHGT-8, June, 2006Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dillon D, Panesar R, Wall R, Allam R, White V, Gibbins J, Haines M. Oxy-combustion processes for CO2 capture from advanced supercritical PF and NGCC power plant. In: 7th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies. Vancouver, September, 2004, Volume 1Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rezvani S, Huang Y, McIlveen-Wright D, Wang Y D. Comparative assessment of sub-critical versus advanced super-critical oxy-fuel PF boilers with CO2 sequestration facilities. Fuel, 2007, 86: 2134–2143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Neville H E. Gasification and IGCC—Design issues & opportunities. The GCEP Advanced Coal Workshop, Utah, March 15–16, 2005Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    John G, John D. Transmission of CO2—safety and economic considerations, IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme. Energy, 2004, 29: 1319–1328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gerrard A M. Guide to capital cost estimating. IchemE 2000, Institution of Chemical Engineers, ISBN-13: 9780852953990Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    GTW. Gas turbine world. GTW, Victor de Biasi, 2006 Handbook, Vol 25Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Y. Huang
    • 1
  • S. Rezvani
    • 1
  • D. McIlveen-Wright
    • 1
  • N. Hewitt
    • 1
  • A. Minchener
    • 2
  • J. Mondol
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Sustainable Technologies, Co. AntrimUniversity of UlsterColeraineNorthern Ireland, UK
  2. 2.IEA EPL Gemini HouseLondonUK

Personalised recommendations