Phenolic rigid organic filler/isotactic polypropylene composites. I. Preparation
- 40 Downloads
- 3 Citations
Abstract
A novel phenolic rigid organic filler (KT) was melt-mixed with an isotactic polypropylene (iPP) to prepare a series of PP/KT composites, with or without maleic anhydride grafted polypropylene (MAPP) as compatilizer. The evolution of filler morphology during melt-mixing and melt-pressure processes was monitored by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and polarized optical microscope (POM). The influences of shear force, pressure time, filler content and MAPP concentration on the final filler dispersion were studied. We found that this rigid organic filler readily melted and dispersed homogenously into the iPP matrix through a fission-fusion process during the melt-mixing process. Thus a balanced dispersion, which was closely related to shear force and MAPP concentration, can be achieved. During the meltpressure process, parts of the filler particles combined gradually through a coalescence process. However, the incorporation of MAPP can effectively inhibit the tendency to coalesce and refine the filler particles sizes into nanoscale. Thus, a series of PP/KT composites with controllable filler particles size and narrow size distribution can be obtained just by adjusting process conditions and MAPP concentration. In addition, due to the in-situ formation mechanism, the filler phase possessed a typical solid true-spherical shape.
Keywords
rigid organic filler polypropylene dispersion in-situ formationPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Yuan Q, Jiang W, Zhang H X, Yin J H, An L J, Li R K Y. Brittle-ductile transition in high-density polyethylene/glassbead blends: effects of interparticle distance and temperature. J Polym Sci: Polym Phys, 2001, 39: 1855–1859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Liang J Z, Li R K. Brittle-ductile transition in polypropylene filled with glass beads. Polymer, 1999, 40: 3191–3195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Wilbrink M W L, Argon A S, Cohen R E, Weinberg M. Toughenability of Nylon-6 with CaCO3 filler particles: new findings and general principles. Polymer, 2001, 42: 10155–10180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Fellahi S, Chikhi N, Bakar M. Modification of epoxy resin with kaolin as a toughening agent. J Appl Polym Sci, 2001, 82: 861–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Radonjič G, Šmit I. Phase morphology and mechanical properties of iPP/SEP blends. J Polym Sci: Polym Phy 2001, 39: 566–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Tang L X, Qu B J, Shen X F. Mechanical properties, morphological structure, and thermal behavior of dynamically photocrosslinked PP/EPDM blends. J Appl Polym Sci, 2004, 92: 3371–3380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Kim J Y, Chun B C. Effect of high density polyethylene addition and testing temperature on the mechanical and morphological properties of polypropylene/ethylene-propylene diene terpolymer binary blends. J Mater Sci, 2000, 35: 4833–4840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Ha C S, Cho Y W, Go J H, Cho W J. Dynamic mechanical properties of polypropylene-g-maleic anhydride and ethylenepropylene-diene terpolymer blends: effect of blend preparation methods. J Appl Polym Sci, 2000, 77: 2777–2784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Xiao H W, Huang S Q, Jiang T. Morphology, rheology, and mechanical properties of dynamically cured EPDM/PP blend: effect of curing agent dose variation. J Appl Polym Sci, 2004, 92: 357–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Yui H, Wu GZ, Sano H, Sumita M, Kino K. Morphology and electrical conductivity of injection-molded polypropylene/carbon black composites with addition of high-density polyethylene. Polymer, 2006, 47: 3599–3608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Fekete E, Michler G H. Aggregation, fracture initiation, and strength of PP/CaCO3 composites. J Macromol Sci Phys, 1999, 38: 885–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Yang K, Yang Q, Li G X, Sun Y J, Feng D C. Mechanical properties and morphologies of polypropylene with different sizes of calcium carbonate particles. Polymer composites, 2006, 27: 443–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Ruan W H, Huang X B, Wang X H, Rong M Z, Zhang M Q. Effect of drawing induced dispersion of nano-silica on performance improvement of poly(propylene)-based nanocomposites. Macromol Rapid Commun, 2006, 27: 581–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Karger-Kocsis J. Polypropylene: structure, blends and composites. London: Chapman & Hall, 1995, Chapter 1Google Scholar
- 15.Thio Y S, Argon A S, Cohen R E, Weinberg M. Toughening of isotactic polypropylene with CaCO3 particles. Polymer, 2002, 43: 3661–3674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Thomas S, Groeninckx G. Reactive compatibilisation of heterogeneous ethylene propylene rubber (EPM)/nylon 6 blends by the addition of compatibiliser precursor EPM-g-MA. Polymer, 1999, 40: 5799–5819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Jose S, Francis B, Thomas S, Karger-Kocsis J. Morphology and mechanical properties of polyamide 12/polypropylene blends in presence and absence of reactive compatibiliser. Polymer, 2006, 47: 3874–3888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Wu S. A generalized criterion for rubber toughening: The critical matrix ligament thickness. J Appl Polym Sci, 1988, 35: 549–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Lamb H. Hydrodynamics, 6th ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1932, 598Google Scholar
- 20.White J L, Liu D, Bumm S H. Development of dispersion in rubber-particle compounds in internal and continuous mixers. J Appl Polym Sci, 2006, 102: 3940–3943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Kim H S, Lee B H, Choi S W, Kim S M, Kim H J. The effect of types of maleic anhydride-grafted polypropylene (MAPP) on the interfacial adhesion properties of bio-flour-filled polypropylene composites. Composites: Appl S, 2007, 38: 1473–1482CrossRefGoogle Scholar