Advertisement

Frontiers of Computer Science

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 170–182 | Cite as

A fast registration algorithm of rock point cloud based on spherical projection and feature extraction

  • Yaru Xian
  • Jun XiaoEmail author
  • Ying Wang
Research Article
  • 31 Downloads

Abstract

Point cloud registration is an essential step in the process of 3D reconstruction. In this paper, a fast registration algorithm of rock mass point cloud is proposed based on the improved iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm. In our proposed algorithm, the point cloud data of single station scanner is transformed into digital images by spherical polar coordinates, then image features are extracted and edge points are removed, the features used in this algorithm is scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT). By analyzing the corresponding relationship between digital images and 3D points, the 3D feature points are extracted, from which we can search for the two-way correspondence as candidates. After the false matches are eliminated by the exhaustive search method based on random sampling, the transformation is computed via the Levenberg-Marquardt-Iterative Closest Point (LM-ICP) algorithm. Experiments on real data of rock mass show that the proposed algorithm has the similar accuracy and better registration efficiency compared with the ICP algorithm and other algorithms.

Keywords

rock point cloud registration LM-ICP spherical projection feature extraction 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61471338), Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS (2015361), Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, CAS (QYZDY-SSW-SYS004), Beijing Nova Program (z171100001117048), and President Fund of UCAS.

Supplementary material

11704_2016_6191_MOESM1_ESM.ppt (298 kb)
Supplementary material, approximately 279 KB.

References

  1. 1.
    Akca D, Gruen A. A flexible mathematical model for matching of 3D surfaces and attributes. In: Proceedings of SPIE-IS&T Electronic Imaging. 2005, 184–195Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Salvi J, Matabosch C, Fofi D, Forest J. A review of recent range image registration methods with accuracy evaluation. Image and Vision Computing, 2007, 25(5): 578–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Besl P J, McKay N D. A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1992, 14(2): 239–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen Y, Medioni G. Object modelling by registration of multiple range images. Image and Vision Computing, 1992, 10(3): 145–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Farin G E, Hoschek J, Kim M S. Handbook of Computer Aided Geometric Design. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 2002zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang T S, Duan Q C, Wang R. Research on registration method and precision in terrestrial 3D laser scanning. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent Earth Observing and Applications. 2015Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jia D F, Cheng X J, Liu Y P, Cheng X L. The orientation method of terrestrial 3D laser scanner. Geotechnical Investigation & Surveying, 2014, 10: 60–65Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chua C S, Jarvis R. Point signatures: a new representation for 3D object recognition. International Journal of Computer Vision, 1997, 25(1): 63–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Johnson A E. Spin-Images: A Representation for 3-D Surface Matching. MPitsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University, 1997Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stamos I, Leordean M. Automated feature-based range registration of urban scenes of large scale. In: Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2003, 555–561Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen C, Stamos I. Semi-automatic range to range registration: a feature-based method. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling. 2005, 254–261Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dai J L, Chen Z Y, Ye X Z. The application of icp algorithm in point cloud alignment. Journal of Image and Graphics, 2007, 12(3): 517–521Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Manay S, Hong BW, Yezzi A J, Soatto S. Integral invariant signatures. In: Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Computer Vision. 2004, 87–99Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gelfand N, Mitra N J, Guibas L J, Pottmann H. Robust global registration. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Eurographics Symposium on Geometry Processing. 2005, 197–206Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Huang Q X, Flöry S, Gelfand N, Hofer M, Pottmann H. Reassembling fractured objects by geometric matching. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 2006, 26(3): 569–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang L, Ma H C, Gao G, Chen Z. Automatic registration of urban aerial images with airborne lidar points based on line-point similarity invariants. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2014, 43(4): 372–379Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Díez Y, Roure F, Lladó X, Salvi J. A qualitative review on 3D coarse registration methods. ACM Computing Surveys, 2015, 47(3): 45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chen J, Wu X J, Wang M Y, Li X F. 3D shape modeling using a self-developed hand-held 3D laser scanner and an efficient HT-ICP point cloud registration algorithm. Optics & Laser Technology, 2013, 45(1): 414–423Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhong Y, Zhang M. Automatic registration technology of point cloud based on improved ICP algorithm. Control Engineering of China, 2014, 21(1): 37–40Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhao MB, He J, Luo X B, Fu Q. Two-viewing angle ladar data registration based on improved iterative closest-point algorithm. Acta Optica Sinica, 2012, 32(11): 305–314Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhang L, Choi S I, Park S Y. Robust icp registration using biunique correspondence. In: Proceedings of International Conference on 3D Imaging, Modeling, Processing, Visualization and Transmission. 2011, 80–85Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fitzgibbon A W. Robust registration of 2D and 3D point sets. Image and Vision Computing, 2003, 21(13): 1145–1153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Biber P, Straβer W. The normal distributions transform: a new approach to laser scan matching. In: Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. 2003, 2743–2748Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Magnusson M, Lilienthal A, Duckett T. Scan registration for autonomous mining vehicles using 3D-NDT. Journal of Field Robotics, 2007, 24(10): 803–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yang M Y, Cao Y, McDonald J. Fusion of camera images and laser scans for wide baseline 3D scene alignment in urban environments. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2011, 66(6): S52–S61Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Al-Manasir K, Fraser C S. Registration of terrestrial laser scanner data using imagery. The Photogrammetric Record, 2006, 21(115): 255–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Łepicka M, Kornuta T, Stefańczyk M. Utilization of colour in ICP-based point cloud registration. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Recognition Systems. 2016, 821–830Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Syed I A, Sharma B. Hybrid 3D registration approach using RGB and depth images. In: Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Conference on Image Information Processing. 2013, 27–32Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lowe D G. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2004, 60(2): 91–110MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bay H, Ess A, Tuytelaars T, Gool L V. Speeded-up robust features (SURT). Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 2008, 110(3): 346–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rublee E, Rabaud V, Konolige K, Bradski G. ORB: an efficient alternative to SIFT or SURF. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Computer Vision. 2011, 2564–2571Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zhang Y, Zou Z. Automatic registration method for remote sensing images based on improved orb algorithm. Remote Sensing for Land & Resources, 2013, 25(3): 20–24Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yang J, Cao Z, Zhang Q. A fast and robust local descriptor for 3D point cloud registration. Information Sciences, 2016, 346–347: 163–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shi P. Study on local descriptor. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2008Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Chen C S, Hung Y P, Cheng J B. A fast automatic method for registration of partially-overlapping range images. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer Vision. 1998, 242–248Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mellado N, Aiger D, Mitra N J. Super 4PCS fast global pointcloud registration via smart indexing. Computer Graphics Forum, 2014, 33(5): 205–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Perumal L. Quaternion and its application in rotation using sets of regions. International Journal of Engineering and Technology Innovation, 2011, 1(1): 35–52Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lato M, Kemeny J, Harrap R M, Bevan G. Rock bench: establishing a common repository and standards for assessing rockmass characteristics using lidar and photogrammetry. Computers & Geosciences, 2013, 50(1): 106–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bouaziz S, Tagliasacchi A, Pauly M. Sparse iterative closest point. Computer Graphics Forum, 2013, 32(5): 113–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Artificial IntelligenceUniversity of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations