Relative manifold based semi-supervised dimensionality reduction
- 52 Downloads
- 4 Citations
Abstract
A well-designed graph plays a fundamental role in graph-based semi-supervised learning; however, the topological structure of a constructed neighborhood is unstable in most current approaches, since they are very sensitive to the high dimensional, sparse and noisy data. This generally leads to dramatic performance degradation. To deal with this issue, we developed a relative manifold based semi-supervised dimensionality reduction (RMSSDR) approach by utilizing the relative manifold to construct a better neighborhood graph with fewer short-circuit edges. Based on the relative cognitive law and manifold distance, a relative transformation is used to construct the relative space and the relative manifold. A relative transformation can improve the ability to distinguish between data points and reduce the impact of noise such that it may be more intuitive, and the relative manifold can more truly reflect the manifold structure since data sets commonly exist in a nonlinear structure. Specifically, RMSSDR makes full use of pairwise constraints that can define the edge weights of the neighborhood graph by minimizing the local reconstruction error and can preserve the global and local geometric structures of the data set. The experimental results on face data sets demonstrate that RMSSDR is better than the current state of the art comparing methods in both performance of classification and robustness.
Keywords
cognitive law relative transformation relative manifold local reconstruction semi-supervised learningPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Duda R O, Hart P E, Stork D G. Pattern Classification. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2001, 566–581MATHGoogle Scholar
- 2.Jolliffe I T. Principal Component Analysis (Springer Series in Statistics). 2nd ed. Springer, 2002Google Scholar
- 3.Martinez A M, Kak A C. PCA versus LDA. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2001, 23(2): 228–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Roweis S, Saul L. Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. Science, 2000, 290: 2323–2326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Belkin M, Niyogi P. Laplacian eigenmaps for dimensionality reduction and data representation. Neural Computation, 2003, 15(6): 1373–1396MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.He X F, Niyogi P. Locality preserving projections. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2004, 16: 153–160Google Scholar
- 7.Tenenbaum J B, Silva V D, Langford J C. A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Science, 2000, 290(5500): 2319–2323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Zhang Z Y, Zha H Y. Principal manifolds and nonlinear dimensionality reduction via tangent space alignment. SIAM Journal of Scientific Computing, 2004, 26(1): 313–338MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Zhu X. Semi-Supervised Learning Literature. Technique Report 1530, Department of Computer Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison. 2008Google Scholar
- 10.Klein D, Kamvar S D, Manning C D. From instance-level constraints to space-level constraints: making the most of prior knowledge in data clustering. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Machine Learning. 2002, 307–314Google Scholar
- 11.Zhang D Q, Zhou Z H, Chen S C. Semi-supervised dimensionality reduction. In: Proceedings of the 7th SIAM International Conference on Data Mining. 2007, 629–634Google Scholar
- 12.Cevikalp H, Verbeek J, Jurie F, Klaser A. Semi-supervised dimensionality reduction using pairwise equivalence constraints. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computer Vision Theory and Applications. 2008Google Scholar
- 13.Wei J, Peng H. Neighbourhood preserving based semi-supervised dimensionality reduction. Electronics Letters, 2008, 44(20): 1190–1192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Yan S C, Xu D, Zhang B Y, Zhang H J, Yang Q, Lin S. Graph embedding and extensions: a general framework for dimensionality reduction. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligent, 2007, 28(1): 40–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Cai D, He X F, Han J W. Semi-supervised discriminate analysis. In: Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 2007Google Scholar
- 16.Belkin M, Niyogi P. Semi-supervised learning on riemannian manifolds. Machine Learning, 2004, 56(1): 209–239MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Zhang Z Y, Zha H Y, Zhang M. Spectral methods for semi-supervised manifold learning. In: Proceedings of the 26th IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2008Google Scholar
- 18.Wen G, Lu T, Jiang L, Wen J. Locally linear embedding based on relative manifold. Journal of Software, 2009, 20(9): 2376–2386MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Georghiades A S, Belhumeur P N, Kriegman D J. From few to many: illumination cone models for face recognition under variable lighting and rose. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2001, 23(6): 643–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Sim T, Barker S, Bsat M. The CMU pose, illumination, and expression database. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2003, 25(12): 1615–1618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Wen G H, Jiang L J, Wen J, Shadbolt N R. Performing locally linear embedding with adaptable neighborhood size on manifold. In: Proceedings of the 9th Pacific Rim International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2006, 985–989Google Scholar
- 22.Zhang H, Berg A C, Maire M, Malik J. SVM-KNN: discriminative nearest neighbor classification for visual category recognition. In: Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2006, 2: 2126–2136Google Scholar
- 23.Bergman T J, Beehner J C, Cheney D L, Seyfarth R M. Hierarchical classification by rank and kinship in baboons. Science, 2003, 302(5648): 1234–1236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Li DY, Liu C Y, Du Y, Han X. Artificial intelligence with uncertainty. Journal of Software, 2004, 15(11): 1583–1594 (in Chinese)MATHGoogle Scholar
- 25.Wen G H, Jiang L J, Wen J, Wen J, Yu ZW. Perceptual relativity-based local hyperplane classification. Neurocomputing, 2012, 97: 155–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Wen G H, Pan X J, Jiang L J, Wen J. Modeling Gestalt laws for classification. In: Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics. 2010, 914–918Google Scholar
- 27.Guihua W, Jun W, Li J. Perceptual nearest neighbors for classification. In: Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on Computing, Theories and Applications. 2010, 118–122Google Scholar
- 28.Wen G, Jiang L, Wen J. Local relative transformation with application to isometric embedding. Pattern Recognition Letters, 2009, 30(3): 203–211MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.WEI Lai, WANG S J. Semi-supervised discriminant analysis based on manifold distance. Journal of Software, 2010, 21(10): 2445–2453Google Scholar
- 30.Guo G, Dyer, C R, Learning from examples in the small sample case: face expression recognition. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2005, 35: 477–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Wen G H, Wei J, Wang J B, Zhou T G, Chen L. Cognitive gravitation model for classification on small noisy data. Neurocomputing, 2013, 118: 245–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar